GWGI was thinking about your use case yesterday. If you added private feeds to your system, then wouldn't other people in Aperture get them if you use the same store?
aaronpkit knows which users are subscribed to which feed, so i would have to treat feeds fetched with authentication as a completely separate feed per user
jeremycherfasCan anyone explain what would make a file readable on one machine (iMac) and not on another (MBA)? (Asking here because it is so much friendlier) Background: I save log files to Dropbox for later analysis. On my laptop, when I open the file in BBEDIT, the whole thing is upside down red question marks. On the iMac, perfectly legible.
[snarfed]jeremycherfas: probably character encoding. run `file [filename]` and see which encoding it’s in. if it’s not ascii or utf-*, you’re going to have a bad time
rockoragerre: ticketauth and the client_id issue....if the ticket/access_token is given to a site and not a client, then a client would need to request existing access_tokens on behalf of the site to be able to e.g. retrieve a private feed? Am I understanding that right?
[jacky]okay so I'm like at the point with https://git.jacky.wtf/indieweb/sele where if someone ran it themselves, they'd be able to get a IndieAuth server for like multiple sites (or just one, that's how I use it), see which apps they've authorized and see when tokens will expire. I'm thinking more now about how to add something for TicketAuth (after I clean up some tests) and how to potentially add logic to help build something for audience
[jacky]I saw/view "audience lists" as a only-visible-to-you list of h-cards or URLs (guess it could be a 'stubbed h-card') of people who can view a particular post but I was kinda wondering if such a list could be extrapolated from one's Microsub server instead (by pulling the authors of the feeds in a channel)
[jacky]Does anyone have something similar to this or thoughts around this approach? Would like to pool some thoughts on it. I feel like [fluffy], you have something similar in Authl?
[fluffy]Authl only handles login, the actual access control is a function of Publ. And in Publ there’s a config file which declares access control lists and then individual entries can reference those lists.
sknebel[jacky]: not sure how that'd link to a microsub server. I guess you could take feeds from there as suggestions? but generally, "I follow this feed" does not mean any meaningful trust level for me
[fluffy]Having an integration point between microsub and publish ACLs would be interesting. I don’t think it’d fit Publ’s overall model especially since Publ itself tries to be pretty IndieWeb-agnostic (ticket auth is technically the only indieweb-specific thing it has in the code directly but it’d make a lot of sense for a more indieweb-specific social stack.
[jgmac1106], [aciccarello], doosboox and [tantek] joined the channel