HarryCoburn[m]If you're not handling sensitive data and you don't care about ranking on Google, do you think it's worth the hassle to add encryption to your site?
[chrisbergr]In our day-to-day business at the agency, we constantly have to consult a law firm on the subject of GDPR. Among other things, Article 32 is always referred to when it comes to https.
petermolnarI won't argue that is what the lawyers say, but GDPR only applies to PII. If there's nothing, but a comment field - no user, no email, etc - GDPR doesn't even apply, for example.
[chrisbergr]A comment field without name and email adress? I think that's unusual, but okay. But it is also regulated that even the IP address is personal data.
Murray[d]Seb[d] I don't make my check-ins public (yet), but I post check-ins fairly frequently and have never used Swarm or OYS, so some of us do exist 🙂 I use my CMS pretty universally, including for check-ins. Actual location data is pulled from OpenStreetMap via a plugin.
Murray[d]I do not, no 😅 I'm not really sure what the use case would be for microformats on a check-in? If I ever do make them live I'll likely provide a minimum level of information (lat/long, datetime, and my h-card) just in case I tag anyone else, but haven't given it too much though
Murray[d]Yes, but I'm not sure that I would really want either of those things to happen. A check-in will never be a reply (for my purposes); it may be a mention, so providing the info that people tend to like for webmentions could be useful. And I don't think I'd ever want anyone to subscribe to my check-ins, nor do I want to effectively provide an immediate API to that data.
Murray[d]I do intend to make them public, just haven't spent much time thinking about what that would look like 🙂 Reply context is a valid reason; I guess I "reply" in a slightly less social-media like way, so I forget about microformats as a sort of "preview", but fair point
Seb[d]But yea, if they are not public then the markup is less important. Just asking because my first point was about the markup of checkins specificly :)
[manton]Anyone have tips for debugging ActivityPub? I’ve noticed that follow requests from Mastodon → my server seem to be getting 500 errors. No obvious errors on my side, though, and checking WebFinger and whatnot manually look fine. The test suite also looks offline now.
aaronpkonly way i've found to successfully debug stuff like that is either setting up your own mastodon server to look at the logs or find someone who's running one who can look at their logs
[manton]Not totally sure… I think it was mostly my bug. I noticed there were some WebFinger requests that didn’t have an “Accept” header, and I had a bug that would throw an error in that case… When I fixed that, I accidentally introduced _another_ bug in my code where the “acct” URI wasn’t correct. All working well now.
[manton]I think Mastodon’s “503 SSL” error is a red herring. Probably just happens whenever the hostname or account URL doesn’t match up with what it expects.
schmudde, ranuzz, digivonity and [snarfed] joined the channel
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "Shortcut" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "Shortcut is ____", a sentence describing the term)