Loqiidentity loss on the web is when someone loses their account(s), domains, and/or usernames for any reason, and one of the notions why it's better to focus on a presence where you are in control while treating social media only as an ephemeral distribution mechanism https://indieweb.org/identity_loss
[tantek]for DVDs, I bet Apple's DVD player app triggers various AppleScript events that could possibly be used for an AppleScript -> MicroPub posting client
aaronpkmy general approach to these things is to rely on all the work done by other people to push that data to places like last.fm and trakt.tv and pull it back from there
[tantek]I was going to use the #Bridgy hashtag but it's both filled with nothing to do with our Bridgy, and I have no idea what it's supposed to represent
[tantek]Yes I feel we should all be directly replying peer-to-peer to snarfed's blog post, making it an exemplar of sorts. Of course while POSSEing our replies to Twitter and tweet-threading them with his POSSE tweet to perhaps motivate de-duplication of Bridgy backfeeds of POSSE replies 🙂
prologicQ: Are there any known good instant messaging protocols that are more web friendly? I'm not talking about older/outdated (some barely used nowadays) protocols like XMPP, IRC, etc (these sadly whilst serve or did a useful purpose at some point, require fucking around with your network, opening up ports, etc)
[tantek]the communities around each approach tend to be fairly disjoint, so it's hard to build a community that bridges the two. though you might find that here
[tw2113_Slack_]when i first started with my current employer over 9 years ago, our internal chat was IRC, then we moved to Hipchat for awhile, and now slack
[tantek]"Have fun" as the 11th principle is not a diminishing of its importance, quite the opposite. By being important enough to be added to an existing list of 10, instead of rigidly sticking with 10, "Have fun" to some degree is a strong modifier on all the above. If you're not having fun, why does the rest of any of it matter and why are you spending your time on it?
[chrisaldrich]It reminds me of some of the old video (VHS) review guides (Siskel & Ebert had one back in the day) that would be useful for browsing and then hunting things down. (Similar to some of the /watch UI and movie lists that have been brewing here the last week or two.) I'm sort of tempted now to print out the 4000 or so titles I've got in my digital library to have a physical book (maybe coffeetable format) for browsing.
[chrisaldrich]I'm reminded of the lost serendipity of browsing book shelves in libraries that we've lost in the shift to digital. How can we bring some of that back in digital libraries?
Loqifun is one of the IndieWeb principles and a key motivation for the IndieWeb — making and using your own website should be fun, otherwise what’s the point? https://indieweb.org/fun
Zegnatfun << Fits as the 11th [[principle]] as it is the jester’s number (German: <i>Narrenzahl</i>) celebrated in Mainz by a read of the jester’s constitution (German: <i>närrischen Grundgesetzes</i>) on November 11 (aka <i>Elfter im Elften</i>).
Loqiok, I added "Fits as the 11th [[principle]] as it is the jester’s number (German: <i>Narrenzahl</i>) celebrated in Mainz by a read of the jester’s constitution (German: <i>närrischen Grundgesetzes</i>) on November 11 (aka <i>Elfter im Elften</i>)." to the "See Also" section of /funhttps://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=79045&oldid=76882