#dev 2022-01-16
2022-01-16 UTC
typ1cal_c0ffxe3 and aspenmayer[d] joined the channel
# lagash [KevinMarks]1: has this little SEO "hack" been corrected since?
# capjamesg[d] edgeduchess[d] I saw this and thought you might like it: https://css-tricks.com/jumping-into-webmentions-with-nextjs-or-not/
# capjamesg[d] I would still love to make something with Next.js for the IndieWeb but I'm out of ideas right now 🙂
# capjamesg[d] [James_Van_Dyne]++ for all of the indieweb-utils contributions!
# capjamesg[d] [James_Van_Dyne] Good question. I am not sure.
# capjamesg[d] I wonder how feed readers usually treat sites with multiple alternative feeds.
# capjamesg[d] I could add the autodiscovery tag to my posts. And another one to my likes page, etc.
# [James_Van_Dyne] capjamesg: For sure. Happy to lend a hand. Thank you for taking the initiative to make a repo and get the project rolling 🙂
# [James_Van_Dyne] also a nice change of pace from Tanzawa
omz13 and KartikPrabhu joined the channel
# capjamesg[d] No worries! I am learning a lot from your contributions 🙂
# capjamesg[d] How is Tanzawa going?
# capjamesg[d] So I could add my alternate links on all pages?
tetov-irc, nertzy and sayanarijit[d] joined the channel
# capjamesg[d] That is an excellent point tantek.
# capjamesg[d] How would you balance this?
# capjamesg[d] I have a feed for likes, bookmarks, notes, and posts.
# capjamesg[d] I actually think I'm going to aggregate notes and posts, leaving three different types of feeds.
# capjamesg[d] I agree that people want to follow people. Ultimately, I wouldn't offer a likes / bookmarks feed if it meant people found it much harder to subscribe to my notes and articles. But that is just me. I personally like being able to follow certain types of content.
# capjamesg[d] Arguably, this is the sort of thing a feed reader is best positioned to address. But I am not sure most feed readers have a rich ecosystem around blocking keywords / muting certain content types in a feed.
# capjamesg[d] For instance, if I could publish everything in one feed ("follow me online") and know that feed readers would enable people to discard likes, I'd love that.
# capjamesg[d] My ideal feed reader might say "Follow James'... [] Likes [] Bookmarks [] Notes and Articles" rather than asking people to follow separate "feeds" and make a choice between them.
# sknebel also the assumption that because we've made up a definition for a modern social reader everyone now uses one of those and other users arent worth considering is kind of annoying. it's a good goal, and if you design a new or improve an existing reader for sure take it into account, but today not everybody uses them
hi-its-me joined the channel
# capjamesg[d] This is an interesting discussion.
# capjamesg[d] I don’t want to provide a lower quality experience to those using RSS just because I myself use a social reader built on Microsub.
# capjamesg[d] An aggregate feed would not deliver a positive experience to most readers.
# capjamesg[d] The ratio of likes and bookmarks to articles could be 7-10:1.
# capjamesg[d] Whereas if I mainly advertise my articles feed, I’m happier.
# capjamesg[d] I offer likes and bookmarks feeds but I wouldn’t expect most people to subscribe to them:
# capjamesg[d] And don’t consider them primary content.
# capjamesg[d] I love the idea of likes / bookmarks as a discovery mechanism though:
# capjamesg[d] I have been thinking about this a lot and I think what would really drive the IndieWeb social reader idea is a world-class UX that completely abstracts from most of the standard language.
# capjamesg[d] Something that feels as easy to use as Instagram but without all of the rubbish / “algorithm” / etc.
# capjamesg[d] Because that is the sort of experience people are used to, it is likely that one would need a great product to get lots of people in the ecosystem. But that is a long term view, not what I think is needed right this very moment.
# capjamesg[d] Here is my reader on mobile:
# capjamesg[d] I have been trying to build something that abstracts from standards. I have best achieved that in the feed. The rest of the application has a lot of work to do.
# capjamesg[d] But I still have a lot of work to do haha.
# capjamesg[d] I love the idea of following people and then having a smart default.
# capjamesg[d] That smart default can look for signs of a reaction (I.e. a certain property) and mute accordingly.
# capjamesg[d] Visitors could overwrite the default behavior. And indeed completely reimplement it in a fully interoperable ecosystem.
# capjamesg[d] I love being able to just scroll in my reader.
# capjamesg[d] All my posts appear in one channel. They are tagged in multiple channels but there is a single one that aggregates them.
# capjamesg[d] Thus, I can get the latest on everything without having to go to another page. And I can react, and leave comments to all the posts I see.
# capjamesg[d] tantek I might write about social readers on my blog to solidify some of my thoughts.
# capjamesg[d] Good point re: romanticizing RSS.
# capjamesg[d] Technologies should be talked about because they enable you to do something you want to do.
jamietanna joined the channel
# jamietanna GWG I've looked at the Web Share API before, but Firefox didn't support it at the time i looked so I didn't do anything about it
KartikPrabhu, typ1cal_c0ffxe3, Seirdy, jjuran and tetov-irc joined the channel