2022-03-03 UTC
tetov-irc, Darius_Dunlap[d], jacky, jzeneto, [jgmac1106], justAstache, Seirdy, tbbrown, Fe, jamietanna1, superkuh, gerben, strugee, mro, [Francesco_Impr], polezaivsani, [tw2113_Slack_], [tantek], sayanarijit[d], rrix, Silicon[d], Eddy04[d] and Saphire joined the channel
kinduff_, kinduff__, jacky, tbbrown, sp1ff and mro_ joined the channel
# 15:07 sp1ff aaronpk: ah, I think I see-- the template author includes them?
# 15:08 aaronpk Yea, it's meant to be built in to the site rather than something a user would ever see
# 15:09 aaronpk the docs and tutorials and such of course mention how to add them to HTML because they're written for the people who are writing the HTML
mro joined the channel
# 15:12 sp1ff Got it. I just use Emacs org-mode to publish my site, so shouldn't be too hard to add 'em. Thanks.
mro and tbbrown joined the channel
# 16:18 [schmarty] 🤔 can it really be offline _first_ if you have to visit the site at least once while online to get the serviceworker installed? 😂
mro joined the channel
# 17:10 [tantek] [schmarty] worth adding to the FAQ. "visiting the site at least once" is a web equivalent of "install the app", so yes, in as much as people treat any piece of software as "offline first", you can't use it offline without first installing it 🙂
# 17:11 [schmarty] glances towards the few pieces of physical software install media in his home
# 17:13 [tantek] hah. whether you install from physical media or the network, you still have to take that install step. even that "physical software install media" had to traverse the slow network known as the "global supply chain" 🙂
jacky, justAstache and barnaby joined the channel
antrdnv[d], mro, angelo and tbbrown joined the channel
# 20:46 jacky indieweb amongst the people in front of you
mro joined the channel
# 21:13 [KevinMarks] Thats what scuttlebutt was like for me - it didn't work until I was in the same room as people using it
kimberlyhirsh[d] joined the channel
# 21:15 [KevinMarks] Though that can be harder now with devices having other networks than the shared WiFi
# 22:08 jacky I'm looking at things I'd want to incorporate into my Webmention submission form to prevent bad links (already restricting it to URLs known to my site for inbound)
# 22:14 sknebel hm, I feel like rate-limiting that feature would be enough and non-intrusive?
# 22:17 [tantek] I think the thread model is drive-by manual spamming and other opportunistic attacks, not automated (at least at first)
# 22:45 jacky yeah actually that's what I'm thinking about (drive-by attacks_
# 22:45 jacky but I should also make a very clearly defined threat model
[chrisaldrich] joined the channel
# 22:46 sknebel yeah. i.e. someone plugging in random URLs for fun isnt stopped by doing it in a browser
# 22:49 sknebel but also whats the damage. a) resource use b) fetching other stuff b.1) resource use on other sites b.2) your server talks to sites you wouldnt let it talk to?
Saphire joined the channel
# 22:50 sknebel a) and b.1) are not too bad if slowed down enough, b.2) you can't prevent with captcha either
# 22:51 sknebel (if I'm scripting an attack I also can just use your WM endpoint directly, so the captcha there I can easily circumvent)
# 22:51 sknebel so you primarily stop dumb pots putting urls in random fields?
tetov-irc, marksuth[d] and P1000[d] joined the channel