#prologicRemember when I invited y'all (or anyone) to help me design some kind of Indie-style IM/Chat/PM thingy
#prologicWell I've been highly motivated lately by the fact my young children are gaining interest in this space (messaging Mum/Dad, which will eventually be messaging their friends), so I decided to do something about it
tracydurnell[d], mro, gRegor, jacky and angelo joined the channel
#[aciccarello]One thing I was thinking about yesterday with expiring content. Do people tend to completely hide the content or just unlist it so it doesn't show up in feeds?
gRegor joined the channel
#[tantek]I believe the intent of expiring content is removal, not just unlisting
#[tantek]e.g. so that if someone reloads the page, had it in a tab etc., then the expiring content would be removed (which could be only *part* of a post)
#jackyI haven't implemented it yet but I do have ideas for this in the context of a feed and removing items that are 'expired'
#[tantek]in other news, how's everyone's NPM dependencies today? especially if you happen to have a server running at certain GeoIPs?
#LoqiExpiring content is content that is only temporarily (ephemerally) relevant, and also part of a larger post, that can and should be (preferably automatically) removed once a particular datetime has passed (the expiration date) https://indieweb.org/expiring_post
#[tantek]the latter part makes sense to me (making expired posts private) and thus by implication not listing them (for others)
#[aciccarello]I'm wondering if anyone supports both kinds of expiration. One where you don't want to highlight the content in the feed. The other where you want it to be in-accessible.
#[tantek]there's three levels so far: unlisted, private, removed
#jackymy eventual implementation is going to be only the former, the latter requires some unguessable URL stuff (the way I'd want to do it) and I don't want to do that just yet
angelo joined the channel
#[tantek]there's potentially four actually, if you count the possibility of content with revisions
#[tantek]n.m. not four, but rather still 3 for the ephemeral partial content case
#[tantek]public previous revision with ephemeral content, private previous revision with ephemeral content, removed ephemeral content
#[tantek][KevinMarks] you probably have some opinions here
balupton[d] and kimberlyhirsh[d] joined the channel
#[snarfed]nice! ...sadly not sure what Google's announcement amounts to though. $3M over 5y equates to...a few employees' headcount or so, ongoing, and the policy principles seem very vague and high level. π€·
#[snarfed]maybe it's just, "hey, remember we do these things? we're still doing them!"
#[tantek][snarfed] that was my impression also. perhaps one of those blog posts that's focused on nudging stuff internally by making a public statement.
Seirdy joined the channel
#[KevinMarks]Wasn't there a tweet series on what manager level you needed to be at Google to launch a project by writing a blog post
tracydurnell[d], eqirax[d], P1000[d], shaunix[d], corenominal[d], wackycity[d], MarkJR84[d], indieweb-irc-bri, hoenir, YimingWu[d], kimberlyhirsh[d], laker[d], Murray[d], balupton[d], edburns[d], capjamesg[d], Nan[d], hans63us[d], farrisswisher and jacky joined the channel
#angelohmm.. i just posted something to discord but it didn't make it to irc