[snarfed]doesn't really matter for Bridgy yet though. it averages 30-60qpm to the Twitter API, and both the v2 tiers are way lower than that, 1.7qpm and 3.3qpm
[snarfed]soo....what happens when I sign up for the Essential tier? does my account and all of its apps immediately _lose_ access to the v1.1 API? that would be...bad
[snarfed]they do say "If you were approved for a developer account before November 15th, 2021, you were automatically converted to Elevated access. This means that your existing Apps can continue to be used to make requests to standard v1.1, premium v1.1, and enterprise endpoints, and that all of your user Access Tokens are still valid."
[fluffy]I’m really happy to see work moving forward on indieweb-tumblr. I’ve been on a kick of evangelizing this a lot lately, and I have a bunch of other things I’d love to see tumblr add beyond removing href.li and adding mf2.
@fluffy↩️ For a while I've been posting to tumblr some ideas for how tumblr can become a better indieweb player, and have submitted some of them to wip but I'm not sure if they saw them.
I'd love to see full bidirectional webmention support and the ability to subscribe to external feeds. (twitter.com/_/status/1522075034763755521)
[snarfed]on the plus side, re the Twitter v2 API: "We are removing language in our Developer Policy that restricted how you build with Twitter’s core features, and limited the number of users you can support through your app...Specifically, we’ve removed terms that restricted replication of the Twitter experience, including Twitter’s core features"
callym[m]> If a client wishes to use a redirect URL that has a different host than their client_id, or if the redirect URL uses a custom scheme (such as when the client is a native application), then the client will need to explicitly list those redirect URLs so that authorization endpoints can be sure it is safe to redirect users there.
callym[m]> If a client wishes to use a redirect URL that has a different host than their client\_id, or if the redirect URL uses a custom scheme (such as when the client is a native application), then the client will need to explicitly list those redirect URLs so that authorization endpoints can be sure it is safe to redirect users there.
[KevinMarks]For the 'what should Tumblr inc do' list, should that go on /Tumblr or in the github repo I made? Issues seem like a possible approach, but a narrative of the different things we'd liek them to do and the benefits might suit the wiki page.
[manton][snarfed] That Twitter policy change is so welcome. I still might not do much with the API because I don’t want to get burned again, but… _finally_.
IWDiscordGateway<capjamesg> sknebel I spun up a new server, installed apache and php8.1, then used the composer installer to get everything going. I moved the files into the /var/www/known/ directory, made the requisite apache2.conf changes as per the installation process, and then I had a new blog. The key is that I spun up a new server. nginx and apache2 were conflicting on my main server and causing a lot of issues.
[tantek][KevinMarks] looks like we have been using a section named "IndieWeb Friendly" to document existing IndieWeb support, pending/submitted IndieWeb support, and requests/proposals for more
Loqi[James' Coffee Blog] I have just backfilled all of my likes, bookmarks, and notes into Known. I haven’t made a decision yet but I am most likely going to use my Known instance here at jamesg.coffee from now on. #indieweb
@edheil↩️ Apparently not. I was hoping http://brid.gy would autopost but it didn't seem to, so I did it manually. Which.... was kinda silly... cause the wp post in question was redundant with an existing tweet (twitter.com/_/status/1522259842815209475)
[snarfed]hs0ucy the indieweb community is generally focused on indie _web_, not indie hosting. the key parts of indieweb to us are 1) own and use your own domain, and 2) use tools that let you easily export and migrate your data
[fluffy]There’s a bunch of “public good” services that members of the community run, such as webmention.io and so on, which are helpful transitional tools which make it easier to take the next step later without having to invest a huge amount of resources into getting started.
[fluffy]Ideally by the time that brid.gy is running into scaling issues that make using it a concern, it’s because the indieweb is so well-established that we don’t really even need it anymore. 🙂
[snarfed]hs0ucy, your point is definitely well taken! lots of people here like and prefer self/indie hosting. that's great! we just don't make it a top priority or requirement for everyone's site and all of our tools. our priority is indie _web_, more than hosting
[fluffy]For what it’s worth, with brid.gy you’re not “depositing your data” elsewhere, it’s just acting as an adapter to convert mentions from a silo service (which you don’t own) to mentions on your webmention endpoint (which you very well could own). The only data that’s being “owned” externally is stuff that isn’t indie to begin with.
[fluffy]Like you’re not relying on brid.gy to host your data, you’re still hosting your own site, and if you’re running your own webmention endpoint, you’re still in control of the data that brid.gy generates.
@BekoPharm↩️ What's this? #Cloudfare breaking the web again? Good job. "Oooh, Linux, Hacker, Bad." Just like breaking #Webmentions eh? "Your request appears to be automated" No shit! (twitter.com/_/status/1522302305172865025)
@BekoPharm↩️ What's this? #CloudFlare breaking the web again? Good job. "Oooh, Linux, Hacker, Bad." Just like breaking #Webmention|s eh? "Your request appears to be automated" No shit!
(Repost to fix rage typo in hashtag) (twitter.com/_/status/1522303229073276930)
JSQso if I have an ID set for a div, and I make a class that will be for 3x3x3 pictures. Can I set the box to be width:30%; height: 30% and that'll be the size of the boxes within that main div?