@MikeWMerrittFor those using the #ActivityPub plugin on their #WordPress blogs for #webmention: Replies from Mastodon are coming in with the correct link but as "Anonymous" for a name. I can't seem to find a solution. Any suggestions? I have both AP and webmention plugins installed. (twitter.com/_/status/1593412123123716098)
barnabyugh and trying to do some browser console stuff to extract anything useful from the twitter follow list page is an exercise in futility due to their bizarre CSS and markup
barnaby[snarfed]: is 1s a reasonable sleep time between granary.io requests? I’ll be making ~3000 of them, and happy to spread it out over however long is suitable
@samuelgoto↩️ If you put a rel="me" attribute in your links you can make that machine readable, which should help with things like indieauth (small win, but also small price).
e.g. <a rel="me" href="https://mastodon.social/@erynofwales">@erynofwales</a>
e.g. view-source:https://code.sgo.to/ (twitter.com/_/status/1593494995478097922)
aaronpkbut i suspect single-user instances of mastodon and others are going to become a lot more popular now compared to when mastodon was originally starting
[manton]By the way, does anyone know how to set a post in ActivityPub to be un-boostable? I’ve heard this is possible but can’t find any documentation for it.
sknebel(i.e. if its just convention that "audience != everyone -> no boost" or if it explicitly signals that somewhere in AP and just sets that by default on such posts
[jacky]The hope is that as people "follow" people on their own site, that slowly builds a passive ACL of people to send tokens too. The only thing that's tricky that'd be the "last" thing I need is to have a way to build a 'list' of people to post to. I think I have an idea for it but it's a bit janky
[tantek]Saphire, barnaby, following re: xrate etc., the fundamental problem is, all such ratings are country & culture specific. There is no global way to evaluate such things, so there is no way a "standard" could claim to represent whether something is e.g. NSFW or not. But apparently Google decided a binary flag was good enough for them for some sort of global "average"
[tantek]My guess is they are able to do that only because they *also* have tons of algorithms doing semantic analysis and image/video analysis to determine whether something is "adult" or not or "safe" or not
[tantek]such that adding in an opt-in adult flag doesn't harm their results, and if they already have decent algorithmic results, such opt-ins may marginally help them not have to write more code
[tantek]unfortunately what maybe happening is erring on the side of social conservatism, and in particular since both companies are US-based, US-notions of social conservatism, which, if anyone has watched the news in the past say 5 years or so, is kinda going poorly
[tantek]and then applying that to the rest of the world. it's a weird form of cultural export / borderline imperialism because say, folks in Europe presumably don't see any *more* content than folks in the US. in some cases, due to local regulations, they may see less of some kinds
[tantek]and speaking of which, there are different laws in different countries about this kind of stuff, so just wait til every admin of a popular Mastodon instance finds out when they get randos posting all sorts of "interesting" content
[aciccarello]Social standards for what's inappropriate vary so widely I don't know how you'd encode that in a global rating system. I imagine it is possible if an organization had enough of an interest but seems unlikely.
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "640 ratings" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "640 ratings is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[keithjgrant][aciccarello] The Omnibear popup window has a little webmention icon in the top right if you’re on the reply, like, bookmark, or repost screen
[keithjgrant]i seem to recall it being a little buggy at times and not always showing. If you find that, feel free to report a bug. I’m actively working on updating pretty much all the tooling and core dependencies right now
[Murray]it's all interlinked. 960px happens to fit nicely within a 1024px viewport (fullscreen HD) with a little spacing for browser chrome, whilst offering lots of layout possibilities (2,3,4,5,6,8, and 12 column grids), so it was a good tradeoff.