#aaronpk[rose] since I see you on the volunteer list for Düsseldorf, would you be willing to help me try out a Zoom-based remote participation setup? I am considering subscribing to three accounts for this month so we can try it out at both Düsseldorf and Utrecht. if it works well at DUS, then you can help people get set up in Utrecht since you'll be there too.
#aaronpkif *that* goes well, then we should probably actually use that instead of Vidyo at Summit
#@tDuring #IndieWebCamp #Berlin I built a simple theme switcher for my site!
hyperlinks -> URL query param -> PHP to add class to <body> & query param to local links -> CSS class selectors -> CSS variables -> colors & font. No cookies, no JS. #indieweb
https://tantek.com/t50P1 (twitter.com/_/status/1125927388833931264)
#[Rose]The organiser can record on their machine with Zoom, but if we want higher fidelity recordings then recording your screen separately is a good idea.
#[frank]Pretty cool to see IWC Utrecht featured this morning in Handpicked, in a good Dutch newsletter for entrepeneurs, developers and makers! See Loqi's bot-URL-thingie above.
#[frank]Can someone explain to me what the difference in focus is in channels Meta, Chat and Indieweb? If I want to discuss some ideas and thoughts on IWC, what's the proper channel? /me thinks Indieweb?
#[Rose]Chat is unlogged, so off topic. Meta is event and wiki related stuff, and indieweb is everything else. This is what I _think_, I might be wrong.
#LoqiJoin the #indieweb discussions via the web, Slack, IRC, or Matrix interfaces now with additional channels for dev, wordpress, and meta specific chat! https://indieweb.org/discuss
#ZegnatIf anything is unclear there, [frank], keep poking people until it is fixed ;)
#[Rose]Aha, That tallied with my brain! (Though not necessarily what I said)
#[frank]Story of my life [Zegnat], poking people because stuff is unclear... 🙂
#ZegnatJust need to be clear about the fact that most of us are fine with (digital) poking ;)
#ZegnatAnd you’ll have a couple of people with multiple IWC experiences in Utrecht who will probably happily volunteer to help IRL as well (poking optional)
#[frank]needs a new wiki entry about "indie-poking" 😉
#[Rose]If they don't have Wi-fi, are they ok with us bringing our own router for the weekend? (Yes, I own a travel router.)
#[Rose]And arranging tables, do they mind if we move things around? (Assuming we put it back afterwards of course)
#[frank]I know they have WiFi, even fiber I think. Generally, connectivity is not a big issue in the Netherlands. As long as you don't live in rural areas on the edges of the country...
#[Rose]It's just WiFi was on the list, that's all 😛
#[Rose]I vote for Yay on the Eurovision party, because people who don't care about Eurovision can still sit with those who do and talk about other things.
#ZegnatThing is venue availability there. As Eurovision tends to run late.
#ZegnatI think sebsel said he knew of some places (though those may not have been in Utrecht). It is just nice to know if we want to do a viewing with people we know, haha
#[Rose]I approve of the Stroopwaffel entry on the list.
#[frank]There is one thing I'd like to check with IWC-veterans that has come up, especially with the photography policy. I have a long-standing friendship with HJ Winkeldermaat (https://punkmedia.nl) a good photographer from Arnhem. He has always done some amazing photo-work at events, (tries to) blog, has sympathy for what we do. He offered to come over on Saturday to shoot pics from the event and share those with us. Most of the time he puts them on
#[frank]sometimes he posts some of them on social media, but only after approval (I hope).
#[frank]How do you feel about a photographer coming over to make some great shots of the event? It can help to use them on the wiki for future events, maybe for your own site, maybe a new avatar pic?
#[Rose]I personally have no objection. In Berlin last weekend we added stickers to people's name tags - yellow meaning "please ask before you take my picture" and red being "please don't take my picture", as I have them in the organisers box I would propose we use them again, and that the photographer be made aware of their meaning. (No sticker means photographs are good!)
#[frank]Yes, I agree with the policy. I want to send him some more info later today on the how, why and what and thought I first check it here as well. I think the policy gives good boundaries and I will def share this with him.
#[Rose]This also means we won't have to find a way to prop up my iPhone to take pictures which sounds smart!
#LoqiFrank has 13 karma in this channel over the last year (19 in all channels)
jeremych_ and [stefp] joined the channel
#jeremycherfas!tell [frank] Getting in to the building and rooms has been difficult at some places and for some people in the past. Good to check what access wil be like on both days.
#ZegnatSo there is no reason why we couldn’t have that in Utrecht
#ZegnatWe do always try and give people the option to chose not to be photographed. Berlin used red stickers for it. As long as the photographer is OK working with that, all seems good!
#Zegnat[frank]: I believe the organiser kit in [Rose]’s possession has yellow and red stickers that can be put on badges to signify ask about photos and no photos respectively. But if you have a better way for people to show their photo preferences, make use of whatever you have :D
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "photo preferences" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "photo preferences is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#LoqiA photography policy or recording policy is an event policy to make it clear when photographing/recording is acceptable, and how attendees can communicate their preferences; IndieWebCamps are often livestreamed, and have photographers or organizers who take both informal session photos and group photos that are often published publicly https://indieweb.org/photography_policy
#GWG!tell [Yulia] I'm not sure the best place to send them. We usually upload them to the Indiewebcamp Youtube account at the least. But due to the size, I'm not sure where you could put them that we could access them. There's that new Mozilla file sharing thing...can you get us a link using that?
#GWGRegardless of where we upload them, we need to be able to get at them
#GWGI've never done the uploading before, so I'll volunteer
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106][frank] also important for your photographer to know all IWc related photos on the wiki get a public domain license. They need to be willing to give up rights
#[jgmac1106]well give up rigths sounds bad, share the rights with the world
#Zegnat[jgmac1106]: that is only when uploaded to the wiki. E.g. the photos on the Tollwerk Flickr are not public domain
#[jgmac1106]yeah meant on the wiki...good to know about the Tollwerk photos, good model, and technically the wiki can use a CC-BY-SA photo just needs to attribute and note licesnse
[Rose] joined the channel
#[Rose]Zegnat: I did, I'll try and photograph that soon.
#[frank][Zegnat] I proposed the green photobadge this weekend. But your remark earlier “no badge = OK to photograph” is one less barrier to entry. Which is better.
#ZegnatIt is an opt-out vs opt-in thing. We would like to solve it through coloured lanyards in the future, everyone has one so everyone will have made a conscious choice
#[frank][jgmac1106] thanks for the reminder on licenses. I believe he already does a lot of CC photography.
#[tantek]with reference to existing examples as well
#[tantek]moving green border proposal to separate Brainstorming section
#[tantek]since it's not part of the past and has never been done
#tantek.comedited /friendly (-422) "/* Previously */ move app.net details to its own page since it's now historical, web archive link for their blog post" (view diff)
#tantek.comedited /App.net (+724) "/* IndieWeb Friendly Components */ move indieweb /friendly details here since now historical, fix inaccessible [] numerical links" (view diff)
#tantek.comedited /photography_policy (+2171) "add Mozilla, XOXO, OSBridge, examples - all of which are default ok to photo, move explicit green border to brainstorming (theoretical, no one has done before), mildly against it for reasons of complexity and violation of common conference conventions" (view diff)
#hans.gerwitz.comcreated /Sitewriter (+732) "Created page with "Sitewriter is a simple, configurable service for adding Micropub to static web sites. It is an open source Sinatra application (MIT license), feel free to [https://github.com..."" (view diff)
[eddie], [frank], [xavierroy], [kimberlyhirsh], [schmarty], [pfefferle], dougbeal|iOS, jackjamieson, [Chris_Adams], [Rose] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[jgmac1106]As an FYI IWC Brighton is just before Mozfest...if you can swing both try
#@t↩️ Under the hood I wanted theming that is simple & maintainble. Perhaps implicit #indieweb pragmatic design principles, since we are creating features & systems that individuals can understand & maintain, likely those with less time (e.g. future selves).
https://tantek.com/t50Q2 (twitter.com/_/status/1126202372961722368)
[frank] joined the channel
#@t↩️ Prioritizing simple & maintainable is perhaps most in contrast to enterprise systems, or any system that requires a separate IT person. Minimum viable ops.
#indieweb features & systems should be as easy (easier!) to setup & maintain than smartphones (...
https://tantek.com/t50Q4 (twitter.com/_/status/1126210126212255744)
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
#@ChangelingMxOne thing I’m figuring out as I become more and more #IndieWeb involved: I really don’t care about my following to follower ratio. I only need to do what pleases me, and everyone justs thinks I’m doing what pleases them. It’s the perfect relationship. (twitter.com/_/status/1126212464994062338)