#aaronpkit's misleading to show RSVPs on events.indieweb.org when there's also a ticket link elsewhere, since people may think that posting the RSVP is enough
[jgmac1106] joined the channel
#[tantek]do we have instructions for how to create/clone a page on 2020.indieweb.org for this? I feel it's still something that is non-obvious (there are multiple folders/files to create etc.)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "Foocamp" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "Foocamp is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#[tantek]foo is jargon that is sometimes used in computer language programming examples to express the name of a variable, usually with another variable βbarβ, to illustrate a concept or algorithm; FOO is also an acronym for βFriends Of O'Reillyβ typically seen in the phrase βFoo Campβ, the predecessor of [[BarCamp]], which the IndieWeb community uses as a model for [[IndieWebCamps]].
#[tantek][schmarty] would you consider a re-imagined TWITIW podcast that was live interview-based rather than script based? E.g. start with your usual pre-recorded intro, then do a live interview with whichever community volunteers you've gotten to commit to your Friday afternoon/evening timeslot that week (perhaps 1-2 minimum, max 3?) and prompt *them* to pick out something from the newsletter to share / expand on, then close the podcast with your
#[tantek]usual pre-recorded closer (maybe updated to how to organize a HWC in your own timezone π )
nekr0z[m] joined the channel
#[tantek]That would eliminate the (your) time spent researching everything mentioned in the newsletter, and hopefully minimize subsequent editing as well to "mostly" prepending intro/outro. They might be a bit longer (like 15 minutes instead of 5) but I think that's ok? Anyway, just a thought if you ever feel a draw to attempting a re-imagined weekly indieweb podcast.
#[tantek]And yes I volunteer as tribute / interviewee to help for at least the first month's worth π
[schmarty] joined the channel
#[schmarty]tantek: that is a cool idea! i have been playing with some of the tech to do livestreams where the audio can be extracted into a final podcast.
#[schmarty]i like the idea of having guests choose an item to summarize (along w/ some discussion)
#aaronpki like it! no need to cover _everything_ in the newsletter!
#[tantek][schmarty] to be clear this is mere ideating, not voluntelling or shaming or pressuring in anyway. If it's not something that inspires you like YEAH! then it's totally ok to ignore. π
#[schmarty]haha, thanks. i like the pitch! your proposal really helps knock down some of the major challenges by timeboxing it and spreading out the effort of choosing what to report on and how to summarize it.
#[tantek]distributing burdens/responsibilities is how we construct sustainable community habits
#[schmarty]one hang-up i have about taking it on myself is coordinating with volunteers each week. i don't want to lean too heavily on the same people, for example, so there's work to be done with outreach. particularly important would be working to make sure e.g. white cis male voices are not over-represented. π€
#aaronpkanother thought, i know jean was just talking about restarting micro monday...
RohitKhare1 joined the channel
#aaronpkmaybe there's an opportunity for some collaboration there
#[schmarty](all that to say: i have skills i need to work on before i'd trust myself to commit and do a good job!)
#[schmarty]aaronpk: good idea! jean is a podcasting pro.
#aaronpkyep! and had been doing a weekly podcast pretty consistently!
#[tantek][schmarty] I'm willing to help with coordinating with volunteers each week to help with sharing that part of the responsibility. I am sensitive to and agree with your concerns about overrepresenting white cis male voices.
#[tantek][schmarty] I do think we'd want to pick from folks who are semi-active in chat so they have a context for what is already in the newsletter and speak to it meaningfully (with zero prep time), rather than burdening someone inactive with doing research (and thus adding work for someone that may already be burdened).
#[tantek]snarfed we need a 2020.indieweb.org/west first to point to
#[snarfed]do we? can't point to the events.indieweb.org page?
#[schmarty]tantek: thank you for the offer, which helps a lot! i agree there is a balance to strike there!
#[tantek][schmarty] I think we can also get volunteers from the weekly HWC meetups too
#[tantek](in addition to those active in chat, they're not the same sets of people though there is some overlap)
#[tantek]snarfed, nope, see earlier chat about creating the 2020.indieweb.org subpage where aaronpk pointed to the README
#[schmarty]tantek: very true! and reminds me of the timezone issue when doing a live show, haha. i could see pre-recording a segment or two just before or after an online HWC.
#[tantek][schmarty] that's fine, I want to prioritize a regular timeslot (or slots) that works for you as host.
#[snarfed]ok! as long as that can happen fast at least. if not, pointing to the existing page might be a worthwhile stopgap to make sure we don't lose any possible attendees who see the other pages first