[tantek]^ tracydurnell[d] curious if you've read that article/paper https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm — in particular interested in your opinion of it in the context of your blog post (about getting a broader diversity of folks involved in the indieweb community)
[tantek]organizers << Consideration for discussion at a future Organizers Meetup: 2021-01-08 [https://mediarxiv.org/sf432/ Admins, Mods, and Benevolent Dictators for Life: The Implicit Feudalism of Online Communities] (js;dr unfortunately)
[tantek]organizers << 2017-09-17 [https://medium.com/the-tuning-fork/minimum-viable-structure-92e91048ff66 Minimum Viable Structure: Organisational Scaffolding to Get Out of Emergency Mode] / 8 lightweight interventions to get a working team to shift from sprint to marathon. <blockquote>There’s a lot of goodwill in the group, but right now they’re feeling the pain of doing consensus decision-making using chat + long meetings + a little
tracydurnell[d]Unstructured groups can make it hard to make progress on things because no one's "in charge" so no one wants to make a decision or speak for the group - I think especially there's a sensitivity for women there about how they'll be perceived if they take charge, if they'll be seen as pushy
tracydurnell[d]I could see "elites" like she describes in an established unstructured group being somewhat of a deterrent to women joining, especially if most of the visible people are men so there could be a perception of an old boys club even where it doesn't exist? Without knowing the history of a group I could see drawing the wrong conclusion about the most visible people in a group all being men 🤷♀️ I feel like it's hard to speak for al
[jacky], [chrisaldrich], ben_thatmustbeme, grantcodes[d] and Ramon[d] joined the channel
[tantek]Just as important as it is to be kind and welcoming, it’s also important to speak up when someone is unkind (or other things even bordering on code of conduct “violations” before they happen)
tracydurnell[d]is there a place to make suggestions about meta activities and being more inclusive / welcoming? or better to throw things out in chat to make sure they haven't been done before, and get feedback there before dumping in the wiki? had a few sparked from the comments in the indieweb channel this morning
tracydurnell[d]I also felt a little overwhelmed by chat at first (and honestly am still picking things up), I'm wondering if adding some more details or context at the top of the discussion page on the wiki would help at all -- like still not sure how the karma works, how RTing stuff works (can anyone propose something to RT?), or how to @ people across platforms -- or it's just the conversations themselves that are hard to jump into
tracydurnell[d]I'm also thinking back to a recent discussion about mentorship (GWG I think you were talking about it?) -- I wonder if there could be a slightly more structured "welcoming" / "onboarding" process available for people who want to join -- even to the point of having a few specific friendly people who are open to being contacted with questions listed (I'm thinking of when I worked at the writing center at college, the tutors would put down
tracydurnell[d]or to the event point, if you've ever tried like "New to the IndieWeb" standalone events that could be either mixers to meet other people who are new, or Q&A with knowledgeable folks in a welcoming setting
LoqiDiversity is the extent to which a group's participants are representative of a wide range of human attributes including, but not limited to, race, gender, religion, age, sexual orientation, able-bodiedness, education, socioeconomic status, political leaning, national origin, etc https://indieweb.org/diversity
[tantek]also that definition needs IndieWeb relevance added to it (the contents are obviously IndieWeb relevant / focused, they "just" need to be summarized in a clause in the dfn)
LoqiAnything directly related to people with their own websites, such as technologies and services used, design and UX, formats and protocols, as well as events or podcasts are relevant to the IndieWeb wiki https://indieweb.org/indieweb_relevance
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "definition" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "definition is ____", a sentence describing the term)
tracydurnell[d]I also was wondering about the Twitter page, it looks like it's mostly RTs and auto-posts of the weekly newslettter (and I think going forward Aaron(?) was going to set up auto reminders about events -- I'm guessing that's an intentional choice to minimize workload (and also the practicalities of posting from an org account)?
tracydurnell[d]I was wondering if it could be a tool to test out different messaging to see what resonates, but also that's a lot of work to set up and manage 😆