@brianwistiI see folks using web3 to describe a sort of IndieWeb with math, and other folks using it to describe a pyramid scheme they imagine themselves near the top of, and the first batch may want another term because it reeks of grift. (twitter.com/_/status/1458224644213854212)
@_julianoe↩️ @nhoizey tu as lu ? C'est toi mon lien francophone avec le monde #indieweb (je suis preneur d'autres camarades à découvrir). Ce concept de jardin numérique, formulé comme ça est fantastique. (twitter.com/_/status/1458279651655233536)
@nhoizey↩️ Je l'avais parcouru vite fait lors de sa publication, il faudrait que je prenne le temps de lire plus complètement.
Les copains francophones #indieweb sont de plus en plus sur Mastodon plutôt que Twitter… (twitter.com/_/status/1458389334793539584)
tantek.comedited /2021/Düsseldorf (+514) "contact organizers if questions/problems with codes of conduct; multiple gmaps direction links for discovery" (view diff)
petermolnarwhereas "dead man's switch" is a rather large topic, including, but not limited to, cases when you literally want something to happen in case of your death
petermolnar> This concept has been employed with computer data, where sensitive information has been previously encrypted and released to the public, and the "switch" is the release of the decryption key
[tantek]1petermolnar, given that the switches are for the unexpected failures of people, it seems fairly obvious (implicit in the design/phrasing) that expecting someone (else) to do something is not reliable / automation
petermolnarrelying on a physical switch, yes, I get that, relying on my phone to automate stuff that needs GPS, internet, power, data connectivity, etc, is becoming nearly as unreliable as humans, imo.
[schmarty]'[Raven] rides around in a “big chortling Harley” motorcycle with a sidecar that contains a stolen nuclear bomb rigged to explode if his heart ever stops beating...'
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "watchdog" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "watchdog is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[tantek]1What do folks think of the visual elements of a "summary diagram" and perhaps a clickable "1min intro video" for wiki pages to provide additional learning modalities beyond "prose text description"? E.g. top right of https://indieweb.org/POSSE
[tantek]1If that seems like a helpful pattern (especially for high traffic "first-stop" pages where people link to them from outside), I can try to abstract something into /wikify
[tantek]1[schmarty] I'm thinking of doing it selectively and opportunistically. E.g. that "1min* video intro" on POSSE is from the middle of a much longer talk
[tantek]1Hoping to at least start with some "simple" sketches that make it creating that kind of content more "accessible", as well as an encouragement to re-use this kind of content that was created elsewhere (like the link to the existing video)
[tantek]1anyway, thanks [schmarty]. I wanted to see if this kind of multi-modal intro to pages resonated with anyone else, and if so, whether this "example" on the /POSSE page was "good enough" to encourage similar work on other "popular" pages.
[tantek]1I'm expecting that different people will be drawn to the text description vs the diagram vs clicking on a video they can "just" sit back and watch for a bit
[schmarty]tantek: i definitely support having multiple representations available, as that makes it easier for folks to learn and share in different contexts
[tantek]1I'm also wondering if such a "featured diagram" for a wiki page could/would "automatically" show up in previews in various places people share links
[tantek]1wondering if we need to use a "feature image" template perhaps that could add u-featured to the markup automatically for the h-entry of the page, and somehow have that u-featured image src show up in the Twitter card?