@binyamingreenI'm going crazy over my #CSS.
I'm building a sort of card component. The #HTML is semantic, #IndieWeb-compatible, gluten-free, etc. I know exactly how I want to style it. But... I can't decide on BEM-compatible class-names. Help? (twitter.com/_/status/1473442499167502336)
edgeduchess[d]my theory is that better community spaces that support open standards beyond activitypub are a good building block towards allowing people to run their own blogs etc. with success
[tantek]it's a range of people with different objectives and requirements. yes, some folks are looking for community, some are looking to escape the silos
[chrisaldrich]I moved to Feedly when Google Reader shut down for a long while. It's relatively easy to use and fairly pretty. I much prefer to use Inoreader (and actually have a pro/paid subscription to it) for more functionality and the ability to dovetail with my own website.
tracydurnell[d]I set up the channels when I joined feedly whenever Google Reader died, and they're not super useful now, but I don't think to change them until I go to subscribe to something new and go uhhhhh what channel uh I guess "lifestyle"
tracydurnell[d]I'm also vaguely irritated by their attempts at classifying whatever I'm reading, it has a popup at the top of I swear half the articles asking "was this article about business?" and literally none are
RuxtonGoogle's google+ mandate killed a lot of blogs for me too, as people got google employed they had to stop blogging and use Google+ and when G+ most of them just vanished
edgeduchess[d]It's interesting because you have a bit of a chicken and egg problem, with not enough "good content" for most people's RSS readers but also not enough engagement outside of social networks
edgeduchess[d]as part of that though a big question is how to let people have their own blogs and still plug them into the "ecosystem" with a UX that works for people
edgeduchess[d]that's the second part of my project, but I believe that without community spaces getting people their own blogs is hard because they're just going to end up having to "market" them on social networks anyway
edgeduchess[d]but OTOH this is also the wrong model cause people don't want to join an instance just to find they can't access other ones that they personally want to be able to see
edgeduchess[d]so each community can self-moderate at a more fine-grained level and what I allow on the platform can be broader than what I would allow in a community
edgeduchess[d]how well that works in practice is what we'll see in 2022, cause first quarter of it is going to be finding the right people to lead more communities
edgeduchess[d]> My general obsession recently (and I know I’m not alone in this) has been more about getting audience members to connect with one another rather than singularly with me.
[tantek]that's a fascinating phrase & description (Transformational Fandom). got strong classic "this is what the internet is for" positive vibes from that. thanks edgeduchess[d]++
edgeduchess[d]I think TBH that getting a "good web" back is very much at least partly about realizing we were always the minority, and that most people like affirmational
edgeduchess[d]I think the good part of the fights between transformational people is that they didn't use to be connected to your own identity, so you could step out more easily
[tantek]that's an important feature of pseudonyms for sure, that ability to step in/out at will, disconnected from any persistent or "physical" / "hard" identity
[tantek]since it's directly about how do we use/ build / connect the web to help people find safe(r), more joyful, and connecting experiences under their own agency
[tantek]this is the irony of Mastodon IMO, that despite being "decentralized" and supporting open protocols, by copying Twitter's UX nearly 100%, it has recreated "argument machines", smeared across multiple servers
edgeduchess[d]i guess we can move directly to #indieweb if you want since we're going in another discussion (though I might soon have to be back tomorrow)
tracydurnell[d]@tantek for the "who" page, mocked up a hex-based 2021 US organizers map and wanted to see if it was what you were thinking of or too abstract - if this is the right direction I can do something similar for Europe
tracydurnell[d]would be nice to get a better picture for GWG 😉 and would need to get thumbs up to use pic from Jacky because I pulled it from his site vs indieweb profile
@voxpelli↩️ Also: Metcalfe’s law and the network effect it describes makes any creation of a new network very challenging and will likely only be successfully achieved if it can be built by leveraging the existing web rather than discarding what we already have and starting from scratch. (twitter.com/_/status/1473600028233056256)
@acute_aura↩️ it's kinda funny that even people like jack doresey and him see how web3 is fundamentally broken as a concept
i mean it's the decentralized/indieweb stuff we already have, with blockchain tacked on, and then assumes there will be commercial adoption. (twitter.com/_/status/1473639160653258757)
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "identity loss" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "identity loss is ____", a sentence describing the term)
petermolnar!tell [tantek] I made /identity_loss , copied the block over from /why and converted them to cite templates. Should I redirect the block in /why ?
[tantek]voxpelli, indiewebcamp.com was the old domain, indieweb.org is the new domain, indieweb(.)com is someone else entirely! might want to delete and repost that tweet 🙂
[tantek]petermolnar, re: what to leave in place in /why#Identity_loss, I'd say a {{main|identity loss}} link and then curate the top 3 links and summarize in place there
[tantek]petermolnar, if you want to be pedantic about it, read the definition closely, specifically "it’s better" not "it's absolutely foolproof and can't be lost, taken away, etc"
Loqiidentity loss on the web is when someone loses their account(s), domains, and/or usernames for any reason, and one of the reasons why it’s better to focus on an IndieWeb presence first, and treat social media only as an ephemeral distribution mechanism https://indieweb.org/identity_loss