#@binyamingreenI'm going crazy over my #CSS.
I'm building a sort of card component. The #HTML is semantic, #IndieWeb-compatible, gluten-free, etc. I know exactly how I want to style it. But... I can't decide on BEM-compatible class-names. Help? (twitter.com/_/status/1473442499167502336)
#edgeduchess[d][schmarty]: this is not exactly what I have now, but it's part of what I aim to build
#edgeduchess[d]and a lot of the philosophy is based on darius' post
#edgeduchess[d]my theory is that better community spaces that support open standards beyond activitypub are a good building block towards allowing people to run their own blogs etc. with success
#edgeduchess[d]asking around, for example, I was told the UX mastodon has implemented for RSS is pretty poor
#edgeduchess[d]but generally a lot of people online these days are looking above all for community
#edgeduchess[d]they aren't going to make their own personal spaces unless they know that someone will interact with them
#[tantek]it's a range of people with different objectives and requirements. yes, some folks are looking for community, some are looking to escape the silos
#[tantek]some want interaction from others, others don't.
#tantek.comedited /timeline (+630) "add 1997 indie web manifest term & basic concept, link from 2010 use of term to 1997 publication" (view diff)
#[tantek]re: RSS, nearly any UX around RSS has historically been poor, that's not Mastodon-specific
#edgeduchess[d]Ah, yes, definitely there's a range. I'm talking about my own corner of the web 🙂
#edgeduchess[d]for RSS, what do you think of the modern offerings like Feedly?
#[tantek]I think there's been some experience here with Feedly
#edgeduchess[d]I think it's generally possible to package stuff for different crowds differently, based on similar standards
#[chrisaldrich]I moved to Feedly when Google Reader shut down for a long while. It's relatively easy to use and fairly pretty. I much prefer to use Inoreader (and actually have a pro/paid subscription to it) for more functionality and the ability to dovetail with my own website.
#tracydurnell[d]it really wants you to put all your feeds into channels
#tracydurnell[d]I set up the channels when I joined feedly whenever Google Reader died, and they're not super useful now, but I don't think to change them until I go to subscribe to something new and go uhhhhh what channel uh I guess "lifestyle"
#tracydurnell[d]I'm also vaguely irritated by their attempts at classifying whatever I'm reading, it has a popup at the top of I swear half the articles asking "was this article about business?" and literally none are
#tracydurnell[d]I also am irritated by having to click an article twice to actually get to the website if I don't want to read it in the reader
#Ruxtonand most sites wont publish a full feed because ads
#tracydurnell[d]which I do because I like to open links in my browser to read later, and in the feed doesn't let you ctrl-click to open in new tab
#tracydurnell[d]you just have to go through and read the link and come back
#tracydurnell[d](that last is on their mobile app, it works in browser)
#RuxtonGoogle's google+ mandate killed a lot of blogs for me too, as people got google employed they had to stop blogging and use Google+ and when G+ most of them just vanished
#tracydurnell[d]a lot of who I want to follow are artists and I'm bummed they're on Insta or Twitter instead of RSS
#edgeduchess[d]It's interesting because you have a bit of a chicken and egg problem, with not enough "good content" for most people's RSS readers but also not enough engagement outside of social networks
#Ruxtonyeah similar, the gardens stole a lot of creative folk
#tracydurnell[d]I wandered into a fountain pen forum the other day and they were all linking to images that are now dead links
#edgeduchess[d]as part of that though a big question is how to let people have their own blogs and still plug them into the "ecosystem" with a UX that works for people
#edgeduchess[d]that's the second part of my project, but I believe that without community spaces getting people their own blogs is hard because they're just going to end up having to "market" them on social networks anyway
#edgeduchess[d]I mean a big problem with modern social networks is that moderation is most often outsourced to the platform
#edgeduchess[d]it's only at the individual or platform level
#edgeduchess[d]mastodon solves this a little bit with the person administering the instance having a lot of power to ban other ones
#edgeduchess[d]but OTOH this is also the wrong model cause people don't want to join an instance just to find they can't access other ones that they personally want to be able to see
#tracydurnell[d]do you have a thought for a different model? or still thinking on that part?
#edgeduchess[d]I have various thoughts, some more abstract than others
#edgeduchess[d]I generally think who can post in a community and who a person can follow from their own "dashboard" should be separate
#edgeduchess[d]mastodon very much flattens from all i've seen the idea of individual and community
#edgeduchess[d]you exist as part of an instance, and that's your community of people
#edgeduchess[d]with Boba, I'm taking a slightly different approach which is moving everything one level up
#edgeduchess[d]so I control the instance, but the instance can have sub-communities in it
#edgeduchess[d]so each community can self-moderate at a more fine-grained level and what I allow on the platform can be broader than what I would allow in a community
#edgeduchess[d]how well that works in practice is what we'll see in 2022, cause first quarter of it is going to be finding the right people to lead more communities
#edgeduchess[d]> My general obsession recently (and I know I’m not alone in this) has been more about getting audience members to connect with one another rather than singularly with me.
#edgeduchess[d]that's part of why I'm not working on decentralized blogging, though I'm chomping at the bit to do stuff in that space
#edgeduchess[d]I keep coming back to the fact that I think for a lot of people the joy of the web is the connection between people
#edgeduchess[d]so like a Tumblr without reblogging and whispertags (we talked about them) would have been a much different space
#[tantek]that's a fascinating phrase & description (Transformational Fandom). got strong classic "this is what the internet is for" positive vibes from that. thanks edgeduchess[d]++
#Loqiedgeduchess[d] has 6 karma in this channel over the last year (9 in all channels)
#edgeduchess[d]thank you! I love transformational fandom, it's where I grew up online
#[tantek]that sounds so much more hopeful than social media
#[tantek]tbh I'm both surprised and relieved that at least some folks are able to grow up with a positive creative expression view/lens of "online"
#edgeduchess[d]I have to say, I grew up in the internet of the 00s, so it was a different time
#edgeduchess[d]but my Peak "the Internet is Great" time was 2010-1015 tumblr
#edgeduchess[d]around 2015 is when harassment and internal wars in fandom spaces started getting out of control
#tracydurnell[d]what do you think pushed it out of control? changes in culture, scale?
#[tantek]there was a lot more optimism in the internet of the 00s, especially 2002-2008
#edgeduchess[d]I think TBH that getting a "good web" back is very much at least partly about realizing we were always the minority, and that most people like affirmational
#edgeduchess[d]but the transformational niche can still thrive in its spaces, if we can build them
#[tantek]indeed, and even the majority (nearly all?) "arguments" or fights on social media are between different affirmational factions
#[tantek]lots to think about here. thanks again for the cognitive stretching 🙂
#edgeduchess[d]I think the good part of the fights between transformational people is that they didn't use to be connected to your own identity, so you could step out more easily
#edgeduchess[d]but from what I hear from people that have been doing this longer than me, people have always been vicious
#edgeduchess[d]happy to chat about this whenever, i'm glad to have a space to talk about a better web
#[tantek]that's an important feature of pseudonyms for sure, that ability to step in/out at will, disconnected from any persistent or "physical" / "hard" identity
#[tantek]I'd say this kind of stuff is very on topic for the main #indieweb channel
#[tantek]since it's directly about how do we use/ build / connect the web to help people find safe(r), more joyful, and connecting experiences under their own agency
#[tantek](#indieweb-meta is more specifically about the IndieWeb community site / chat / infrastructure itself)
#[tantek]Not sure I'd agree with the level of absolutism/fatalism of "people have always been vicious"
#edgeduchess[d]oh good to know, i'll move it to that channel next time
#edgeduchess[d]from what I heard people were trying to doxx each other even on LiveJournal, it just was harder
#[tantek]I'm a big believer in the ability of good/bad UX to amplify people's different natures, whether argumentative, or cooperative
#edgeduchess[d]but there were *less* vicious people
#[tantek]this is the irony of Mastodon IMO, that despite being "decentralized" and supporting open protocols, by copying Twitter's UX nearly 100%, it has recreated "argument machines", smeared across multiple servers
#edgeduchess[d]> Nothing creates a fight faster than in-group language overheard by the out-group.
#edgeduchess[d]i guess we can move directly to #indieweb if you want since we're going in another discussion (though I might soon have to be back tomorrow)
[aciccarello] joined the channel
#[tantek]happy to call it a night and pick it back up in the morning in #indieweb web.
#Ruxton"Our online personas are not separate facets of ourselves anymore, but who we exist as.
#Ruxton" ooo that was never the case here, I've always tried to project reality into my online self
#tracydurnell[d]@tantek for the "who" page, mocked up a hex-based 2021 US organizers map and wanted to see if it was what you were thinking of or too abstract - if this is the right direction I can do something similar for Europe
#tracydurnell[d]couldn't find a picture for Maxwell, think I got everyone else though based on event listings
#tracydurnell[d]would be nice to get a better picture for GWG 😉 and would need to get thumbs up to use pic from Jacky because I pulled it from his site vs indieweb profile
#@voxpelli↩️ Also: Metcalfe’s law and the network effect it describes makes any creation of a new network very challenging and will likely only be successfully achieved if it can be built by leveraging the existing web rather than discarding what we already have and starting from scratch. (twitter.com/_/status/1473600028233056256)
#@acute_aura↩️ it's kinda funny that even people like jack doresey and him see how web3 is fundamentally broken as a concept
i mean it's the decentralized/indieweb stuff we already have, with blockchain tacked on, and then assumes there will be commercial adoption. (twitter.com/_/status/1473639160653258757)
Brin[d] joined the channel
#petermolnar.netedited /why (+4102) "cleaned, formatted, and moved links from "See Also" to "Articles and Related Links"" (view diff)
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "identity loss" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "identity loss is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#petermolnaridentity loss means losing one's accounts for any reason (this page is a work in progress)
#petermolnaridentity loss is losing one's accounts for any reason (this page is a work in progress)
#petermolnar!tell [tantek] I made /identity_loss , copied the block over from /why and converted them to cite templates. Should I redirect the block in /why ?
#[tantek]voxpelli, indiewebcamp.com was the old domain, indieweb.org is the new domain, indieweb(.)com is someone else entirely! might want to delete and repost that tweet 🙂
#[tantek]which reads a bit odd though, like indie WE borg, resistance is futile, you will be decentralized, 😛
#[tantek]petermolnar, re: what to leave in place in /why#Identity_loss, I'd say a {{main|identity loss}} link and then curate the top 3 links and summarize in place there
RISHI_RAJ[d] and kimberlyhirsh[d] joined the channel
#petermolnar[tantek]: i disagree with that dfn; domains can be lost, taken away, etc as well.
#[tantek]petermolnar, if you want to be pedantic about it, read the definition closely, specifically "it’s better" not "it's absolutely foolproof and can't be lost, taken away, etc"
#petermolnarputting that get a domain in there feels like bad marketing pitch to be honest.
#petermolnarThere is no need for it to be there at all.
#Loqiidentity loss on the web is when someone loses their account(s), domains, and/or usernames for any reason, and one of the reasons why it’s better to focus on an IndieWeb presence first, and treat social media only as an ephemeral distribution mechanism https://indieweb.org/identity_loss