#meta 2022-01-03

2022-01-03 UTC
eviestears joined the channel
#
@t
Posting notes on your site is the “Hello World” of the independent web. If you speak to the ideals of the #openWeb #decentralizedWeb #distributedWeb #federatedWeb #indieWeb or even #smallWeb, walk your talk: post your notes somewhere you control. ... https://tantek.com/t5G_1
(twitter.com/_/status/1477799190382055425)
cygnoir[d] joined the channel
#
[KevinMarks]
Cluetrain manifesto was early on and a useful rallying one. Different audience than the declaration of independence of cyberspace
#
[KevinMarks]
There were a bunch of bills of rights too.
#
[tantek]
Kevinmarks indeed. I can't seem to find them now because now there are *actual* bills of rights re: social media etc. in various legislatures and they are dominating web search results
#
[tantek]
as opposed to the handwavy stuff from the mid-2000s
#
[tantek]
that's the one
#
[KevinMarks]
Joe being the only one of the signatories not called out for being an abuser
#
@clavinjune
I have enabled WebMention on my blog! Link at my profile. #webmention #indieweb
(twitter.com/_/status/1477829563031834627)
#
[tantek]
[KevinMarks] ugh yeah 😕
#
[tantek]
clavinjune++
#
Loqi
clavinjune has 1 karma over the last year
hepphepp[d] and Tommy1 joined the channel
#
@justagwailo
Life Happens: Towards Community Support For Prioritizing Life Events And Mutual Care, Starting With The #IndieWeb https://tantek.com/2021/051/b1/life-happens
(twitter.com/_/status/1477882542028206081)
[jeremycherfas] joined the channel
#
@alienlebarge
↩️ @Meta is killing the internet. Take a look at #indieweb and medium like @joinmastodon and @microdotblog
(twitter.com/_/status/1477901498814242816)
[James_Van_Dyne] and jamietanna[m] joined the channel
#
jamietanna[m]
Snarfed not sure if you're aware but a couple of times recently my feed reader shows a dozen or so posts of yours appear as new, despite showing their publish date as any time over the last week?
#
petermolnar.net
edited /webring (-43) "removed dead ones, added a new one"
(view diff)
doubleloop[m], mambang[m], diegov, astralbijection[ and binyamin[m] joined the channel
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Now (+42) "nownownow to be possible to link"
(view diff)
#
petermolnar.net
edited /webring (+111) "cleaned, formatted, extended"
(view diff)
#
petermolnar.net
edited /blogroll (+377) "cleanup and formatting"
(view diff)
jjuran, Eclipse[d] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Facebook (+674) "formatted Articles"
(view diff)
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Facebook (+4147) "cleaned, formatted, and moved some links from "See Also" to "Articles and Related Links" (tbc)"
(view diff)
Ramon[d], Eddy04[d] and [Joe_Crawford] joined the channel
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Facebook (+2508) "more articles moved"
(view diff)
#
petermolnar
the Facebook "See Also" is a godforsaken place
#
petermolnar
we can't allow the wiki to be like this
#
aaronpk
haha wow that looks like about 3 years of unsorted citations of tweets and such
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Facebook (+4258) "more articles moved"
(view diff)
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Facebook (+5442) "more articles moved"
(view diff)
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Facebook () "(-7028) articles moved across sections"
(view diff)
#
petermolnar
I think I've had enough for now
#
loqi.me
created /Long_Now (+60) "prompted by petermolnar and dfn added by petermolnar"
(view diff)
#
loqi.me
created /longnow (+48) "prompted by petermolnar and dfn added by petermolnar"
(view diff)
[aciccarello] joined the channel
#
[aciccarello]
I'm seeing a `{{{2}}}` on the top of https://indieweb.org/Facebook is that b/c the TOC is too big?
#
aaronpk
i think it's because the hotlinked image was deleted
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /Facebook (+46) "replace with archive.org logo"
(view diff)
#
[aciccarello]
Ah, that's better
#
[tantek]
petermolnar, as you expressed about the need to be better about the wiki (less of a mess), unless you're in the middle of editing a dfn for "Long Now" that includes direct IndieWeb relevance, going to delete the page.
#
petermolnar
You know that it's a community wiki and nit your personal one, right?
#
tantek.com
edited /wikifying (+25) "/* New pages */ directly indieweb-related"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /wikifying (+93) "/* New pages */ lack of relevance = deleted"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
petermolnar, right, take your own advice there, that's why creating a new page has the burden of proof of indieweb relevance, not "draw my own conclusions on relevance"
#
petermolnar
It is indieweb related in my resd I just ran out of capacity for today. Why does this bother you so much?
#
[tantek]
same reason it bothers you that the FB page was a mess
#
[tantek]
and we should adopt a practice of immediate direct relevance, otherwise deleting pages. if they're indieweb-relevant later, they can be recreated when there's a citation to provide
#
petermolnar
I'm going to walk away from this for now before I write rather angry words.
#
[tantek]
it's a triage problem, first, don't make the problem worse
#
tantek.com
deleted /Long_Now "content was just link to org website, no indieweb relevance. can be recreated with an indieweb relevant dfn when there's an explicit connection/citation"
#
tantek.com
deleted /longnow "content was broken redirect because the " is " shorthand in IRC still doesn't create redirects"
#
tantek.com
edited /whisper_tag (+207) "this article should be deleted unless someone wants to add IndieWeb relevance"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /yunohost (+35) "link self-hosting, no known IndieWeb examples"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /domain_squatting (+207) "this article should be deleted unless someone wants to add IndieWeb relevance"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
what is BookWyrm?
#
Loqi
BookWyrm is a social library platform and open source software built on ActivityPub https://indieweb.org/BookWyrm
#
[tantek]
that seems like a problematic definition
#
[tantek]
what is a social library platform?
#
Loqi
It looks like we don't have a page for "social library platform" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "social library platform is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#
[tantek]
right, that sounds like jargon
#
[tantek]
"built on ActivityPub" is misleading at best, nothing is "built on ActivityPub" because it's not a platform/framework, it's a protocol. something can *support* ActivityPub
#
[tantek]
gRegor, any chance you could take a look at making that definition less jargony (like why is it relevant to users) ?
Seb[d] joined the channel
#
@capjamesg
↩️ Congratulations! Keep us posted on what you build :) P.S. if you want to chat about blogging or building a personal website, check out the http://indieweb.org community :)
(twitter.com/_/status/1478120656042696713)
#
zerojames[d]
[tantek] a quick Loqi message that says “A quick heads up that the see also section of web3 is getting a bit long. It may be time for a cleanup” or something with that sentiment would be useful.
#
zerojames[d]
So we can keep on top of any pages with excessively long See Also sections whose content can be merged into the main page body.
#
zerojames[d]
Or broken out, etc.
#
[tantek]
that's a good suggestion, would be even better if Loqi could point to a subsection of /wikify that provided guidance for how to "clean up" / merge-in See Also additions into the core of the article
#
petermolnar.net
edited /Facebook (+1375) "more articles moved"
(view diff)
#
zerojames[d]
+1
#
zerojames[d]
How do we make this happen?
gRegor joined the channel
#
[tantek]
what is manual until it hurts?
#
Loqi
manual until it hurts is an indieweb principle of resisting automation until you have done it enough times to really understand it, and know that it is worth doing https://indieweb.org/manual_until_it_hurts
#
[tantek]
in this case, zerojames[d], we practice "how to "clean up" / merge-in See Also additions into the core of the article" manually enough times to start seeing helpful patterns / guidance that we can agree on amongst ourselves (e.g. here in #indieweb-meta) and then add that rough consensus to /wikify
#
[tantek]
zerojames[d], note for example that a long "Articles" section is a marginal improvement over a long "See Also" section. So though we don't want to discoruage that, what we really want to encourage is meaningful/thoughtful clustering/incorporation of sets of related See Alsos into their own subsections in a wiki page, typically in Criticism subsections
#
petermolnar
many of those articles, especially under Facebook, combine multiple topics, so putting them under a single part of Criticism doesn't always make sense
#
[tantek]
or is challenging at best
#
[tantek]
sometimes that's what the different quotes are for
#
[tantek]
as in each quote is for a specific kind of criticism, even if they have the same citation links
#
[tantek]
Loqi's code that expands tweets could use the citation template automatically
[manton] joined the channel