@tPosting notes on your site is the “Hello World” of the independent web.
If you speak to the ideals of the #openWeb #decentralizedWeb #distributedWeb #federatedWeb #indieWeb or even #smallWeb, walk your talk: post your notes somewhere you control. ...
https://tantek.com/t5G_1 (twitter.com/_/status/1477799190382055425)
[tantek]Kevinmarks indeed. I can't seem to find them now because now there are *actual* bills of rights re: social media etc. in various legislatures and they are dominating web search results
jamietanna[m]Snarfed not sure if you're aware but a couple of times recently my feed reader shows a dozen or so posts of yours appear as new, despite showing their publish date as any time over the last week?
[tantek]petermolnar, as you expressed about the need to be better about the wiki (less of a mess), unless you're in the middle of editing a dfn for "Long Now" that includes direct IndieWeb relevance, going to delete the page.
[tantek]petermolnar, right, take your own advice there, that's why creating a new page has the burden of proof of indieweb relevance, not "draw my own conclusions on relevance"
[tantek]and we should adopt a practice of immediate direct relevance, otherwise deleting pages. if they're indieweb-relevant later, they can be recreated when there's a citation to provide
tantek.comdeleted /Long_Now "content was just link to org website, no indieweb relevance. can be recreated with an indieweb relevant dfn when there's an explicit connection/citation"
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "social library platform" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "social library platform is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[tantek]"built on ActivityPub" is misleading at best, nothing is "built on ActivityPub" because it's not a platform/framework, it's a protocol. something can *support* ActivityPub
zerojames[d][tantek] a quick Loqi message that says “A quick heads up that the see also section of web3 is getting a bit long. It may be time for a cleanup” or something with that sentiment would be useful.
[tantek]that's a good suggestion, would be even better if Loqi could point to a subsection of /wikify that provided guidance for how to "clean up" / merge-in See Also additions into the core of the article
Loqimanual until it hurts is an indieweb principle of resisting automation until you have done it enough times to really understand it, and know that it is worth doing https://indieweb.org/manual_until_it_hurts
[tantek]in this case, zerojames[d], we practice "how to "clean up" / merge-in See Also additions into the core of the article" manually enough times to start seeing helpful patterns / guidance that we can agree on amongst ourselves (e.g. here in #indieweb-meta) and then add that rough consensus to /wikify
[tantek]zerojames[d], note for example that a long "Articles" section is a marginal improvement over a long "See Also" section. So though we don't want to discoruage that, what we really want to encourage is meaningful/thoughtful clustering/incorporation of sets of related See Alsos into their own subsections in a wiki page, typically in Criticism subsections
petermolnarmany of those articles, especially under Facebook, combine multiple topics, so putting them under a single part of Criticism doesn't always make sense