[tantek]sknebel yes and sort of! Joschi noted that the literal venue from last time I think is gone because they moved but they may have a new venue possibility
[tantek]looking into multiple possibilities so we can maybe choose depending on number of people, or convenience of venue, or features (rooms with windows that open vs internal rooms without windows) etc.
[tantek]right, similarly I'm going to ask about Mozilla Berlin while I'm here (last I heard we were not hosting any community events but doesn't hurt to ask again)
bkilI think it is against the terms of service to publish AI-generated content. But also, the solution is the same as against spam: use word of mouth (i.e., scale with the web of trust).
Loqi🔍 search in the IndieWeb usually refers to searching your personal site for your own content (and/or caches of content you’ve responded to), sometimes searching IndieWeb chat archives or the IndieWeb wiki, or the nascent IndieWeb Search index and service to search across community posts https://indieweb.org/search
bkilgRegor: So the following came up in #dev with [tantek] . We search the wiki every now and then, and the answers don't always come easily. Would it be possible to improve both portal search performance and external SEO? Some brainstorming: include a dedicated section on each page where "hashtag" like phrases or synonyms could be typed in as commonly seen in scientific publication. This might be especially beneficial for very short, stub articles. Sorting pages
tantek.comedited /Falcon (+131) "note a couple more posts in general features, related to the timeline/spectrum of creating/editing/publishing, scheduled posts, delayed publication in Atom feed" (view diff)
[campegg][capjamesg] [tantek] I'll concede that footnotes might be less of a distraction when *writing*, but maintain that having to parse superscript characters (or even worse, ^n notation) in something you're *reading* is more distracting than an inline link. Does the argument that "it's better for writing" supersede "it's better for reading"? #teaminlinelinks4lyfe
[tantek]I think smaller hyperlinks communicate that it can be skipped til later so less distracting than giant blue links that might highlight on hover and tempt you to click
[campegg]This is true. But to play devil's advocate here, links can be styled to be less obtrusive (while not completely unobtrusive), but a superscript character is always going to sit in the reader's eyeline