#sknebel(had to check, but yes, that weekend is right after a string of weekends that are already booked :D)
#sknebel[tantek]: the venue from last time (Thoughtworks) is worth asking again IMHO. but I'm guessing Joschi already told you that :D
#[tantek]sknebel yes and sort of! Joschi noted that the literal venue from last time I think is gone because they moved but they may have a new venue possibility
#[tantek]looking into multiple possibilities so we can maybe choose depending on number of people, or convenience of venue, or features (rooms with windows that open vs internal rooms without windows) etc.
#[tantek]btw I'm masking inside the Capitol Theatre at btconf and maybe 1% of us here are doing so
#sknebelI had offered joschi my employers office as a fallback last time. its still an option assuming it stays a smaller event, but not ideal.
#[tantek]right, similarly I'm going to ask about Mozilla Berlin while I'm here (last I heard we were not hosting any community events but doesn't hurt to ask again)
#[tantek]I can't figure out how to get current daily/weekly case counts for Düsseldorf, or Berlin
#bkilI think it is against the terms of service to publish AI-generated content. But also, the solution is the same as against spam: use word of mouth (i.e., scale with the web of trust).
#IWDiscordRelay<capjamesg#4492> For Google, they prioritize “quality”.
#IWDiscordRelay<capjamesg#4492> How they measure that is another long story, and I’m not sure what their AI guidelines are.
#Loqi🔍 search in the IndieWeb usually refers to searching your personal site for your own content (and/or caches of content you’ve responded to), sometimes searching IndieWeb chat archives or the IndieWeb wiki, or the nascent IndieWeb Search index and service to search across community posts https://indieweb.org/search
#bkilgRegor: So the following came up in #dev with [tantek] . We search the wiki every now and then, and the answers don't always come easily. Would it be possible to improve both portal search performance and external SEO? Some brainstorming: include a dedicated section on each page where "hashtag" like phrases or synonyms could be typed in as commonly seen in scientific publication. This might be especially beneficial for very short, stub articles. Sorting pages
#bkilto one or more wiki categories might also help discovery, but that's a different use case.
#tantek.comedited /Falcon (+131) "note a couple more posts in general features, related to the timeline/spectrum of creating/editing/publishing, scheduled posts, delayed publication in Atom feed" (view diff)
#[tantek]capjamesg++ thank you! Techniques for staying in a flow state while writing hypertext are greatly appreciated!
#Loqicapjamesg has 23 karma in this channel over the last year (88 in all channels)
#IWDiscordRelay<capjamesg#4492> Do you have any more techniques [tantek]?
#[campegg][capjamesg] [tantek] I'll concede that footnotes might be less of a distraction when *writing*, but maintain that having to parse superscript characters (or even worse, ^n notation) in something you're *reading* is more distracting than an inline link. Does the argument that "it's better for writing" supersede "it's better for reading"? #teaminlinelinks4lyfe
#IWDiscordRelay<capjamesg#4492> [campegg] That is a fair argument.
#IWDiscordRelay<capjamesg#4492> There are also accessibility concerns that I have not yet thought about in depth.
#[campegg]I hadn't considered the a11y side of things, but yeah, you're right
#[tantek]I think smaller hyperlinks communicate that it can be skipped til later so less distracting than giant blue links that might highlight on hover and tempt you to click
#[tantek]I am curious how Unicode footnotes sound in screen readers
#[campegg]This is true. But to play devil's advocate here, links can be styled to be less obtrusive (while not completely unobtrusive), but a superscript character is always going to sit in the reader's eyeline
#[campegg]The accidental click is a real thing, though
#[campegg]Also, just for the the record, I am not completely anti-footnote 🙂