#meta 2024-01-18

2024-01-18 UTC
jjuran joined the channel
#
[tantek]
capjamesg it's literally the second resource, after Code of Conduct
#
[tantek]
which I think is correct. we really don't want folks joining chat before first reading the Code of Conduct
#
[tantek]
so if they can't be bothered to slow down enough to find & read the Code of Conduct and then the "💬 Discuss" chat link (should we reword it Discord instead of Discuss? :P) then I'm not sure we want them jumping in the chat
#
[tantek]
We want folks in the community who value both reading and contributing.
#
[tantek]
We really don't want folks who only want to show up and speak their mind and ignore prior work, chats, people in the chat etc.
#
[tantek]
Frankly this is a key component of maintaining a healthier community, encouraging folks who like to read+write, not just write.
#
aaronpk
"Join the Chat" could be a better name for that link than "Discuss" but I agree with all the other points
#
[tantek]
yeah I get that. Though "Join the Chat" going to a wiki page is a bit odd
#
c​apjamesg
The fact I didn't see it while looking at the sidebar while I was writing that message is a sign there is a problem.
#
[tantek]
right below that we do have "📜 Chat log" which links to an actual page where you can join the chat
#
aaronpk
i will admit that "Discuss" is not the most actionable label
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, not really, you're an established community member who has already found the chat. you've probably stared at the sidebar so many times that you're now glossing over it by default. new folks have a greater chance of reading / noticing things.
#
[tantek]
yeah "Discuss" is not great. more actionable would be better
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+8) "try Join discussion"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
We want folks in the community who value both reading and contributing. - This is unrelated. Something being hard to find doesn't mean we necessarily invite the right folks. It means we're more likely to miss the right people, too.
#
[tantek]
yeah, renamed it to "Join discussion" that should be obvious enough
#
c​apjamesg
My hypothesis: There are a lot of mentions of the IndieWeb and fewer but still a notable amount of mentions of the wiki on Mastodon. It is strange that there aren't more people coming in to say hello or to ask questions.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, that's more pushback on "big button" — that's what I'm disagreeing with. Joining the chat should not be elevated in visibility above reading the Code of Conduct
#
c​apjamesg
I have to read 10 links in the sidebar before I learn there is a chat.
#
aaronpk
i don't think everyone who mentions indieweb on social media even actually wants to join a chat about it
#
c​apjamesg
"Join discussion" is open for interpretation (it has vibes of a political CTA; there is a "discussion" happening). "Join our chat" is more actionable.
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk I don't think so either.
#
aaronpk
plenty of people don't like chat rooms
#
c​apjamesg
And plenty of people love Discords 😄
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, "chat" is a turnoff for LOTS of people
#
[tantek]
"discussion" is a good compromise between chat-lovers and email-lovers
#
[0x3b0b]
I acknowledge that even with the speech bubble, my first thought when I see "discuss" is a forum. In the context of a wiki, that would lead me to think about the "talk" pages before I came around to the idea of a chat, unless a chat were what I was looking for. "Join discussion" is at least a little bit better, for my anecdotal case; it feels like it makes me slightly more likely to associate it with the "chat log" right underneath.
#
[tantek]
also, "discussion" sets a framing of more intelligent, frankly, discussion, than just idle chatter
#
[tantek]
discouraging randos from showing up for rando chatter is a good thing, we already get enough of those showing up from time to time
#
[tantek]
re: "read 10 links in the sidebar before", yeah that's a larger question of re-organizing the sidebar sections for better balancing of newcomers and regular users
#
[tantek]
that's worth re-assessing
#
c​apjamesg
A broader point is that at so many stages there are barriers for participation in the IndieWeb community. One could argue every one of those barriers helps filter for someone who would be a positive contributor. With every one, however, we limit who can participate.
#
[tantek]
also Code of Conduct should be before events at the top too
#
[tantek]
we have zero 2024 commitments so I'm dropping that until end of the year
#
c​apjamesg
I'd say the chat is the third most important item in that sidebar.
#
c​apjamesg
Code of Conduct, HWC, then chat.
#
c​apjamesg
Then Brighton IWC.
#
c​apjamesg
And so on.
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (-48) "drop "2024-01-01-commitments|✨ 2024 Commitments!" because it's already 2024-01. can re-add for 2025 in November"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
Lead with things that people can participate in.
#
c​apjamesg
discouraging randos from showing up for rando chatter is a good thing - this doesn't feel like a positive framing. Random people are going to sign up irrespective of how prominent a chat is.
#
c​apjamesg
Does elevating the prominence of chat increase the chance of more random people signing up? Yeah. But does it also increase the chance of other people who may be productive community members to sign up? Yes.
#
c​apjamesg
Of note, many of the people with whom I chat here are the same people with whom I spoke when I first joined the community.
#
c​apjamesg
With all the talk of the social web of late, should we not expect more members to be interested in chatting about websites? We see that trend in HWC, which I have done work to promote, with higher participation numbers and more new participants (with no compromise in the quality of discussion).
#
[tantek]
re: "Code of Conduct, HWC, then chat", "Brighton IWC" — that's reasonable, with some modifications to cluster similar things (events)
#
c​apjamesg
On a related note, I just found: https://lipu.dgold.eu/praxis-indieweb
#
[0x3b0b]
I think I tend toward prioritizing information for new interested people over convenience for people who've gotten their feet wet, and to me that makes at least the first five items under Resources (not in that order) deserve to be elevated above everything above the Resources header with the _possible_ exception of HWC. That is, however, at least partly a matter of personal taste, and I can't really speak to the consensus priorities of the wiki.
#
c​apjamesg
I'm pretty frustrated that we have had so many discussions about improving accessibility to the community and we're not making substantial progress (nor do I feel particularly motivated about doing so, given the feedback on one suggestion from the wiki, the first pushback to which has come from two people who have been here since the beginning).
#
c​apjamesg
I think, broadly, it is unclear to me what the IndieWeb _is_ and what it would like to be (and who is guiding us there).
#
c​apjamesg
I know the principles. This pertains more to how we want people to participate. Do we want this to be a place where people talk about more technical details? If so, we need to be explicitly clear about that. It's okay if that is the case, but if it is we should be pointing people to other related communities where they can find value.
#
c​apjamesg
If someone who implemented most of the standards in the community isn't really sure what the community is about, we have work to do.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, slow down, still editing in response to your suggestion
#
c​apjamesg
Chat might break down with prose; we can maybe do this in an Etherpad 😄
#
[tantek]
chat depends on pacing and back/forth
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (-3) "try some re-organizing based on feedback from capjamesg, 3bob"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
I'm done for now 😄
#
c​apjamesg
(in terms of introduicng new points)
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, can you reload?
#
[tantek]
re: "improving accessibility to the community and we're not making substantial progress" — design is hard, copy editing is hard. lots of folks have opinions on this sort of thing but few folks have actual *good* design and copy editing skills to make "substantial progress" nevermind actual major improvements.
#
c​apjamesg
Looks clearer!
#
c​apjamesg
*Reads clearer
#
[tantek]
re: "Do we want this to be a place where people talk about more technical details? If so, we need to be explicitly clear about that." — that's a good point, may be worth linking directly to #indieweb-dev chat for that
#
[tantek]
let me try something
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+63) "try a developer chat link"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
oh i like the split of all the developer stuff
#
[tantek]
yeah I had some of that before but made it more stark
#
c​apjamesg
I'm going to sleep given the time here. I will read anything else written in the morning and respond when I can.
#
c​apjamesg
Thank you for all the discussion thus far!
#
[tantek]
capjamesg++ greatly appreciated the observations, insights, and feedback. I think we have an incrementally better sidebar now and we can keep improving it (without having to worry about making it "perfect" at any point in time)
#
Loqi
capjamesg has 25 karma in this channel over the last year (133 in all channels)
[KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+15) "Join the community"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+65) "#indieweb hashtag posts using indieweb.social tag page"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+6) "hashtag emoji"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (-17) "stream instead of hashtag"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+0) "slight re-ordering"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
ok lunch break here
#
GWG-
Is the Zoom being tended to?
#
[tantek]
folks please reload a page like https://indieweb.org/Getting_Started and take a look at the Sidebar in particular to see what you like and don't like.
#
[tantek]
is it helpful? what there is not helpful? what is missing that you need/want daily quick access to?
#
[tantek]
(lunch break for me here so I'll be away for a bit, please discuss!)
#
[tantek]
and thanks again to capjamesg for helping unblock making some larger changes
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (+10) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
[lifeofpablo] joined the channel
#
jacky.wtf
edited /Sele (+101) "/* Authorization */ add note of feature being available after becoming Micropub client"
(view diff)
#
jacky.wtf
edited /Sele (+317) "/* Purpose */ expand purpose and goal"
(view diff)
#
[Joe_Crawford]
GWG Zoom was tended to by Pablo! I was in for an hour—was good!
gRegor joined the channel
#
gRegor
Sidebar is looking good. "Get Started" and "Principles" feel like they could be further up, maybe in the Join the Community section.
#
gRegor
"Recent Changes" and "Random Page" feel like they could be lower, in the Tools menu, if that's possible (think that section is automatically generated?)
#
gRegor
Last comment for now, "Wiki content is CC0" could probably be at the bottom of the sidebar, if it's even needed there. Footer on all pages has "Content is available under a CC0 public domain dedication unless otherwise noted.
#
[aciccarello]
Like the sidebar updates
#
[aciccarello]
capjamesg++ tantek++
#
Loqi
tantek has 19 karma in this channel over the last year (97 in all channels)
#
Loqi
capjamesg has 26 karma in this channel over the last year (134 in all channels)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (-10) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
[jeremycherfas] joined the channel
#
[jeremycherfas]
My only fresh comment on the sidebar is that the page as a whole is not great on mobile. I realise Mediawiki responsive layouts are hard, but it would be great if the sidebar were above the main content in portrait mobile.
#
[Jo]
You can change the style when you're logged in can't you?
[tantek] joined the channel
#
[tantek]
[jeremycherfas] indeed the portrait mobile web view is quite painful
[Paul_Robert_Ll] joined the channel
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Gentle reminder that the wiki still needs updating to a useable theme 😉
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
I know the home page is a blocker to upgrading to the newer MediaWiki theme, but I’d argue that its current customisations provide less value than having clearer and more focused content.</rant>
#
sarajaksa.eu
edited /writing (+126) "Adding the link to Is your blog for you or other people?"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
I think it is worth upgrading the theme.
#
foreverliketh.is
edited /indieweb-carnival (-1) "/* Hosting */"
(view diff)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /User:Kaja.sknebel.net/upcoming-hwcs (-349) "update from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
kaja.sknebel.net
edited /Template:next-hwc (+0) "update next date from events.indieweb.org"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
[Paul_Robert_Ll] pretty sure nothing has changed since the conclusions of the discussions at IWC Nurnberg: tl;dr: updating the theme produces a worse result (with more work to do) than the status quo. Help welcome to help solve some of those problem / work to do, OR put in time fixing the current theme. Either way, there are multiple paths forward that don't overall regress the experience
#
c​apjamesg
Do you have notes for the conclusion of that discussion?
#
c​apjamesg
[lifeofpablo]++ for managing the Zoom this week.
#
c​apjamesg
[lifeofpablo]++
#
Loqi
[lifeofpablo] has 1 karma over the last year
#
c​apjamesg
Can we change the link on the home page from "Discuss" to "Join the Community"
#
c​apjamesg
Thanks!
#
c​apjamesg
Do some HWCs still do quiet writing hours?
#
c​apjamesg
On the home page: "Some cities also have a 17:30-18:30 Quiet Writing Hour beforehand."
#
[tantek]
it was very frustrating and a lot of work went into it so it's a bit disheartening when folks oversimplify it to "just upgrade the theme"
#
[tantek]
I don't know of any quiet writing hours since 2019 😞
#
c​apjamesg
The new theme doesn't look great 😬
#
c​apjamesg
Especially on mobile 🤦
#
c​apjamesg
I would draw a line between intentional and unintentional oversimplification. People who didn't know the discussion went on -- and who have not worked with old MediaWiki themes -- wouldn't know.
#
c​apjamesg
I was kind of hoping we'd get a Wikipedia like skin out of the box 😄
#
c​apjamesg
"lots of folks have opinions on this sort of thing but few folks have actual good design and copy editing skills to make "substantial progress" nevermind actual major improvements." - This is not exclusively a design or copy problem. It touches every part of what we do. We touched on this for HWCs and carving out more time at the beginning for site demos (which reminds me that we need to action on that in HWC!). I t
#
[tantek]
capjamesg those are good home page incremental improvement suggestions, appreciated. let's see what we can do
#
[tantek]
some progress (without regressions) is better than no progress or waiting for bigger progress
#
c​apjamesg
Agreed!
#
tantek.com
edited /Main_Page (+2) "Join chat"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
On community management and unproductive participation (i.e. self promotion and leaving, asking questions not in good faith, and variants thereof), I think Write the Docs manages this well.
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Sorry bad wording on my part. My understanding, from last set of discussions, was that the main blocker to updating the theme was the heavy customisation to the home page. And my above point being, that fixing the issues with the current mobile theme would provide more value than keeping the customisations to the home page. There’s a separate discussion about the homepage content/focus etc, which maybe can be detached somewhat fro
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
upgrading the theme. I’ve tried to document the issues etc. on https://indieweb.org/MediaWiki_customizations
#
tantek.com
edited /Main_Page (-304) "delete HWC regular meetup text that was only true 2019 and before (pre-panini)"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
If someone promotes their work, a moderator quickly removes the post and points the user to the community guidelines. I'm not sure how many moderators they have, but it feels like self promotion / asking off-topic questions with which the community cannot help is gone before I even have a chance to see it.
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
As to pros/cons of the updated Vector theme, personal opinions of it aside, its used by one of the most popular sites on the internet, so its familiar to users already, as well as being well tried and tested.
#
[tantek]
main blocker is regressing to what looks like a broken home page on desktop / non-narrow mobile. that's a worse experience, especially for new folks
#
c​apjamesg
Yeah 😦
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Broken, if keep current customisations.
#
c​apjamesg
Do we know why that's the case?
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Content > Design
#
[tantek]
unfortunately sites being "broken on mobile" is still ascribed to "oh it's a weird mobile problem" while sites being broken on desktop are ascribed to "oh this person/community is clueless about web dev"
#
[tantek]
that's just not true [Paul_Robert_Ll]
#
[tantek]
there's plenty of "good" content on the web that is in plain pre text that is completely ignored
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Where would be a good place to ‘mock up’ the current home page in a manor that would not get broken by any theme updates?
#
[tantek]
and looking like every other mediawiki install gives an impression of low value or laziness or both
#
[tantek]
so no, have to strongly disagree. also we had a more plain wiki look before and it was a push factor for lots of new people
#
jamesg.blog
edited /Main_Page (+51) "/* Beyond Blogging and Decentralization */"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
[Paul_Robert_Ll] user: sub pages
#
c​apjamesg
Can we replace " indieweb stream" in the sidebar with "community posts" or something like that?
#
c​apjamesg
The current wording assumes one knows what a stream is.
#
[tantek]
also the reason principles is not higher-up is there is a pending (incomplete) task to make more user-centric than dev-centric which
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Ah, good idea. How about this: I create a sub page of the current home page with customisations that would work independent of any theme. You can then try it with the upgraded theme to see if anything breaks?
#
[tantek]
I mean anyone can test by changing their theme in their logged in prefs
#
[tantek]
and then yes we can get peer review to double-check various themes
#
[tantek]
having it not break in multiple themes would be a good goal
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
But not the current/newest Vector theme. Maybe a first step is to make that available as a user option?
#
[tantek]
people shouldn't be punished for changing their default theme
#
jamesg.blog
edited /Main_Page (+43) "/* Join the IndieWeb */"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, part of this is copy-editing to not just keep bloating the pages with walls of text
#
[tantek]
or breaking design with multiline labels
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+0) "try community posts"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
++
#
c​apjamesg
I'm going to do some polishing up on our Discord.
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+1) "caps, pods"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (+0) "Posts title cap"
(view diff)
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Can we update the Vector (2022) theme to the latest version, as used on Wikipedia? (This is the only other theme option available, and not the default one we use currently)
#
c​apjamesg
We can have a welcome message that informs people of what we talk about, how to participate, and our code of conduct. (standard in almost every community I'm in, including London Web Standards)
#
[tantek]
[Paul_Robert_Ll] I don't know what is required to update the Vector (2022) theme to the latest version, as used on Wikipedia
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, reload a wiki page and check sidebar
#
c​apjamesg
Look at that! Very nice!
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek]++
#
Loqi
[tantek] has 20 karma in this channel over the last year (98 in all channels)
#
[tantek]
please verify/review that the changes work as expected
#
tantek.com
edited /Main_Page (+0) "/* Homebrew Website Club */ bump up image to float next to more content"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
They do indeed!
#
c​apjamesg
This looks more difficult than I think but I'll say it anyway: can we make the sidebar text a touch bigger?
#
c​apjamesg
That's not really a big deal, but it would be kind of nice!
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
[tantek] Would [aaronpk] know how to upgrade existing (or add it as another theme option)?
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
The naming/versioning of this theme is really unhelpful, too!
#
[tantek]
Indeed, see also WordPress themes with the year in the name.
#
[tantek]
Seems like the lessons of the 1980s and 1990s of naming products with the (two digit) year in the title/name were forgotten. Adobe Illustrator 88. Windows 95.
#
[tantek]
I tried web searching for a blog post about product names with years in the titles and it's nothing but SEO spam how to articles about product naming that at this point look like they were all gibberish generated by LLMs with zero human voice
#
aaronpk
Isn't Vector 2022 already installed? https://indieweb.org/Special:Version
#
aaronpk
IIRC upgrading to the newer mediawiki version is what caused these problems in the first place. It used to work fine on mobile with the old version
#
c​apjamesg
Another idea I like from Write the Docs is having an annual survey.
#
c​apjamesg
Theirs is more about technical writing as a profession (roles, reponsibilities, etc.), but a community one could be nice.
#
c​apjamesg
Ask a 2-3 simple questions: what do you like about the community, what can we do better? All are optional.
#
tantek.com
edited /Main_Page (+88) "/* IndieWebCamp */ next IWC, copy edit description a little"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
I'm not sure how I feel about the "simple standards" part in "The IndieWeb is a community of independent and personal websites connected by simple standards,".
#
c​apjamesg
To people who have experience with standards, Webmention, etc. are simple when compared with alternatives.
#
c​apjamesg
But... I wouldn't describe any of them as particularly "simple"
#
tantek.com
edited /Main_Page (+17) "/* IndieWebCamp */ pad that pic"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
I would rather say "The IndieWeb is a community of independent and personal websites connected by thoughtfully-designed building blocks" or something like that.
#
aaronpk
Where does it say "simple"?? Yes let's get rid of that
#
tantek.com
edited /Main_Page (+17) "/* Homebrew Website Club */ left pad"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
That's on our home page.
#
c​apjamesg
In the first yellow box.
#
aaronpk
🤦‍♂️
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] I'm not sure what purpose the "Meetups 2024-01-24" link has
#
[tantek]
capjamesg it is an automatic link to the next meetups!
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
[aaronpk] Vector 2022 is installed, but not the latest version of Vector 2022. Really confusing that it falls under Vector, which is shown on that page as 1.0.0. This is super confusing!
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
The versions of Vector 2022 are quite different, also. Madness
#
[tantek]
indeed [Paul_Robert_Ll]
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
I think the latest version of Vector 2022 is 1.4.1, but likely that we have 1.38 or lower.
#
[tantek]
naming based on a year, then SemVer versioning lol
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
:face_with_spiral_eyes:
#
c​apjamesg
capjamesg it is an automatic link to the next meetups! - is that purpose not served by the previous link?
#
c​apjamesg
The only difference is one takes you to #hwc and the other doesn't.
#
c​apjamesg
I think linking to the homepage is best.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, aaronpk, that "simple standards" is a bit of an anachronism now, but was a direct pushback against the overwhelming developer voices in 2010-2013 advocating for a whole bunch more complex stuff
#
c​apjamesg
Which we do in the first link.
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] I removed the mention of posting on your own site instead of mailing lists from the home page 😄
#
[tantek]
lol why?
#
c​apjamesg
Because many people will not even know what a mailing list is.
#
aaronpk
"simple standards" only makes sense in the context of talking about standards
#
c​apjamesg
I only really learned about mailing lists from the W3C.
#
[tantek]
lol "many people will not even know what a mailing list is"
#
[tantek]
lol as in I am accepting your assertion and laughing at the reality of it
#
c​apjamesg
Yeah haha.
#
aaronpk
https://discord.com/developers/docs/resources/guild-scheduled-event speaking of events, I wonder if we can automate syndicating the events to discord
#
c​apjamesg
So all the fighting people off mailing lists was overall a success.
#
[tantek]
if we really have achieved that level of moving on from mailing lists, that makes me happy
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk[d] I just set them up manually for now.
#
IWDiscord
<c​apjamesg#0>
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, I used say, mailing lists are ok as a support forum, nothing more
#
c​apjamesg
If you go to the Discord as a new member, we now have an onboarding flow.
#
c​apjamesg
#rules refers people to our CoC (no messages allowed).
#
aaronpk
Discord really did do a good job of providing these kinds of tools
#
c​apjamesg
#overview gives a high level overview of the community (no messages allowed).
#
c​apjamesg
I have asked for feedback from some people who know Discord better than I.
#
aaronpk
I know there's also a way to make it so all the channels are hidden until you check a box to agree to the CoC too
#
aaronpk
I don't know how to do it but I've seen it in other discords
#
tantek.com
edited /Main_Page (+6) "open standards rather than simple, a few friendlier words"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
ok capjamesg, aaronpk, ^
#
c​apjamesg
Love it.
#
[tantek]
these are good wording nits. keep them coming
#
[tantek]
we'll keep copy editing what we have until we consider larger more drastic design changes
#
c​apjamesg
Can we enable chat on our Zoom account? It is getting tedious to direct people to Etherpad every time so it would be nice to link directly to it in chat (of course, we'd be clear not to use Zoom chat). I sometimes have to give directions to the Etherpad twice in a meetup.
#
aaronpk
oh, we turned off zoom chat because people kept using it instead of irc/slack/discord chat, but that's a good point
_IWDiscord joined the channel
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, this is a Meetable design hole: events need a "Chat channel: " field that can link to where the chat channel for the event is that is easily discoverrable
#
aaronpk
so many fields for events 😂
#
[tantek]
*optional* fields!
#
aaronpk
true, but the event create form is getting a but unwieldy
#
[tantek]
similarly, Meetable events need an "Event notes:" field so we don't have to keep hunting for the Etherpad link in the beginning or end of the description or hidden behind tiny linktext like "notes"
#
aaronpk
weird ghost IWDiscord
#
a​aronpk
test
#
[tantek]
and that "Event notes" link can be changed afterwards to the wiki page where the Etherpad was archived
#
aaronpk
oh neat you don't need to restart the gateway with config changes
#
[tantek]
"chat in zoom" is not the answer to people not finding the Etherpad. fixing the "not finding the Etherpad" discovery problem is the solution to people not finding the Etherpad
#
aaronpk
ok file issues here, i have some other fixes for meetable in the queue too https://github.com/aaronpk/Meetable/issues
#
[tantek]
also capjamesg, part of the point of encouraging folks to use #indieweb chat instead of Zoom chat is so they'll have a *chance* of continuing in the community instead of disappearing and having zero point of contact after the Zoom is over
#
c​apjamesg
...
#
c​apjamesg
Sorry, testing something.
#
c​apjamesg
I don't think that effect is realised.
#
[tantek]
and also not having to also keep saying over and over in Zoom chat: "Please use #indieweb chat"
#
c​apjamesg
People are still leaving after HWC and not coming back.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, we had many more bounces before
#
[tantek]
it was worse
#
[tantek]
yes some people still leave and don't come back but it was *worse* before. at least now, some people do make the incremental leap to joining the chat and then those that do almost all hang around
#
[tantek]
so let's not regress please
#
c​apjamesg
When is "before" (so I can understand your frame of reference)?
#
[tantek]
when we had zoom chats turned on
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
For the homepage, can the heading not be ‘What is the IndieWeb?’ but say ‘The IndieWeb is a people-focused alternative to the “corporate web”.’ The question framing seems superfluous.
#
[tantek]
[Paul_Robert_Ll] I believe that's there for SEO because people literally search for that and heading text obviously bumps relevance in SERPs
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
I actually have a bunch of thoughts on the homepage, had a go at rewriting it a while back, just wasn’t sure how best to recommend changes. But maybe again I can create a sub page of my user profile and share that?
#
[tantek]
and the answer shows up in Google SERP so that's what we want
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Ah, interesting.
#
[tantek]
we also want folks who ask questions about the IndieWeb to find definitive answers on the wiki instead of random hot-take blog posts by self-proclaimed experts who don't bother to actually participate in the community (yes this happens, as it does for all tech)
#
[tantek]
try searching for "What is the IndieWeb" in your search engine of choice
#
[tantek]
we definitely want our wiki pages beating quora for example for any questions about the IndieWeb
#
[tantek]
as well as random out of date blog posts
#
c​apjamesg
++
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk Random question: How can I change my profile photo in the Slack?
#
c​apjamesg
I have a photo from like two years ago in there.
#
aaronpk
You can do that in slack
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
The content shown in search results says ‘The IndieWeb is a community of independent and personal websites connected by simple standards…’ (which is what I have as a suggestion for the page heading, as opposed to corporate-web line). Not sure if having the ‘What is the IndieWeb’ as a h1 changes the placement of that result.
#
[tantek]
^ please add to /discuss#FAQ
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk This is the photo that comes from the IRC James.
#
c​apjamesg
IIRC
#
[tantek]
[Paul_Robert_Ll] note the second result in DDG (which I presume you're looking at) which does have the question quoted in the SERP.
#
[tantek]
and then note the two out of date blog posts that follow
#
[tantek]
we need to create more search results that push down out of date blog posts
#
[tantek]
because search engines suck at this
#
[tantek]
timely relevance that is
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Is shows a link to the Why IndieWeb page
#
[tantek]
look at the first result, it has the question ans the "people-focused alternative" copy
#
[tantek]
and* the
#
[tantek]
so the question in the heading is having the desired result literally in the first result
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
^Google
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
DuckDuckGo also says “IndieWeb Main Page From IndieWeb Jump to navigation Jump to search Discuss Events What is the IndieWeb?” which isn’t great, either 😕
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
I wonder if there’s a way to fix that?
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] Re: community survey. I'd like to do that. It's hard to know how we can improve without asking people.
#
c​apjamesg
Right now, I'm operating on feedback I have read or have been told directly.
#
c​apjamesg
Which is only a portion of the information we need.
#
[tantek]
DDG-- has been strongly disappointing me lately
#
Loqi
DDG has -1 karma over the last year
#
[tantek]
[Paul_Robert_Ll] try the phrase quoted. I'm seeing it in the Google SERP when doing that
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, survey sounds like a lot of hard work (designing questions with a good methodology, understanding and finding and asking the "right audiences", etc.)
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
`"what is the indieweb?"` in DDG doesn’t bring up the IndieWeb home page at all, the second result being to the https://indieweb.org/Posts_about_the_IndieWeb page on the wiki
#
[tantek]
yeah DDG quality has dropped a lot over the past few years
#
[tantek]
I need to stop using it for personal site search
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
I think it uses the Bing index, no?
#
[tantek]
I don't understand how search engines can't seem to get such a basic thing right. simple plain text site search. like WTF we solved this with Technorati in 2005 and since 2007 every major search engine seems to have a really crappy % index that has lost things it used to have
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] I think we could ask three questions: for how long have you been a member of the community, what do you find valuable about the indieweb, in what ways could the community be better?
#
c​apjamesg
And maybe a fourth that asks if you participate in online events, in person events, chat, etc.
#
[Joe_Crawford]
San Diego may had a quiet writing hour of 2019 -- https://gregorlove.com/2019/12/homebrew-website-club/ -- I was there.
#
[Joe_Crawford]
Search engines deprioritizing full text search is highly depressing. In favor of "let's get you a summary, that's what's you need, I'll just summarize what you want and you will get more value from this search."
#
aaronpk
survey design is a whole field, companies will hire agencies just to create and administer surveys
#
c​apjamesg
I know. I'm starting the discussion 😉
#
aaronpk
what do you want to get out of the survey? what actions do you want to recommend based on the survey results?
#
c​apjamesg
Another potential path is I write and share a blog post saying we're looking for feedback and to come join the chat.
#
c​apjamesg
Regarding outcomes, I think little things like we have done in the last day -- improving the Discord, changing the sidebar -- are wins for encouraging participation. I wonder what things like that we're not thinking about.
#
c​apjamesg
Similarly, I asked about how we can improve HWC and we got some feedback, but that was in one call with ~6 people.
#
aaronpk
ok i am going to do wiki upgrades right now
#
c​apjamesg
.
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk++
#
Loqi
aaronpk has 29 karma in this channel over the last year (106 in all channels)
#
c​apjamesg
I hope all goes well!
#
Loqi
aaronpk has 30 karma in this channel over the last year (107 in all channels)
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
aaronpk++
[aaronpk], IWSlackGateway, [capjamesg] and [KevinMarks] joined the channel
#
aaronpk
`<img>` tags are not built in to MW core anymore
#
aaronpk
looks like it's still there for now, but will be removed in a future version
#
aaronpk
ok looks like things are more or less working on the new version
#
aaronpk
here we go
#
Loqi
Just generated the first draft of this week's newsletter! https://indieweb.org/this-week/2024-01-19.html I'll generate a draft again tomorrow, so please add to it before then! https://indieweb.org/this-week#How_to
#
sarajaksa.eu
edited /writing (+204) "Adding links"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
fyi capjamesg your edits to discord messages get posted to IRC and Slack as new messages
#
c​apjamesg
Sorry 😬
#
c​apjamesg
Is there a way we can turn that off?
#
aaronpk
not really
#
aaronpk
if we can turn off editing messages in discord that would be best. that's what we did in slack
#
c​apjamesg
I think we can do that.
#
c​apjamesg
The prose looked a bit disinteresting to read without the emojis.
#
c​apjamesg
Emojis attract attention ✨
#
c​apjamesg
I think I have done everything I wanted to do today.
#
c​apjamesg
I'm not sure if we can tinker with the Slack onboarding to make it more personalised?
#
aaronpk
i don't see any discord permissions for editing
#
c​apjamesg
I think you can do it at the role level.
#
aaronpk
i don't see it
#
c​apjamesg
Oh, it looks like you can't.
#
aaronpk
ok newsletter generation should be moved over to the new server too
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk I see a new theme?
#
aaronpk
yeah looks like the new vector 2022 version
#
c​apjamesg
Which looks really good!
#
c​apjamesg
Aside from the homepage
#
aaronpk
what is indieweb?
to2ds joined the channel
#
aaronpk
oh i need to add back the theme back for microformats
#
c​apjamesg
This is neat.
#
aaronpk
oh boy
#
c​apjamesg
This might be unpopular but I'd like it if you didn't need to set up your domain name to contribute to the wiki.
#
c​apjamesg
It is a cool feature, but it adds quite a big hurdle. Someone can only contribute if they have a website, even if they have something to say but don't have their domain set up yet, etc.
#
c​apjamesg
One example scenario of this is someone can join HWC without a website but not be able to get on the wiki until they have it set up.
#
aaronpk
having your own domain is one of the core principles of the indieweb, and without that you aren't really on the indieweb at all
#
aaronpk
everything beyond that is optional, but having a domain is the first step
#
c​apjamesg
I think it is a principle of the IndieWeb. Not necessarily the indie web (lowercase).
#
aaronpk
the indieweb wiki is not wikipedia, it's okay to limit it to people who have a website
#
c​apjamesg
Side question: Can I sign up with a subdomain?
#
aaronpk
yes of course
#
c​apjamesg
Perfect.
#
c​apjamesg
In that case, can we improve the log in page?
#
aaronpk
another very practical reason is that this is a fantastic anti-spam measure
#
c​apjamesg
It doesn't really explain what's going on.
#
aaronpk
you should not be able to find that page
#
c​apjamesg
(To find this: Homepage > Login)
#
c​apjamesg
Maybe that's a new thing from the upgrade.
#
aaronpk
probably
#
Loqi
I agree
#
c​apjamesg
Or, rather, it's on every page.
#
c​apjamesg
Loqi 🤦
#
aaronpk
that should take you directly to indielogin.com
[Joe_Crawford] joined the channel
#
[Joe_Crawford]
I have a weird wiki question - were there always spinners at the top of https://indieweb.org/performance ? I feel like I was looking at this page last night and didn't notice animation or that some of the icons are broken.
#
aaronpk
haha looks like someone added those as the page icons
#
c​apjamesg
I have one more thing for now.
#
aaronpk
ugh i hate this mf2 hack of the theme
#
c​apjamesg
This page feels like something that we should move somewhere else: https://indieweb.org/generations
[Paul_Robert_Ll] joined the channel
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
I think there might also be a setting for changing the logo in the header
#
c​apjamesg
I know we have the yellow box but it is startling to me that someone found it and mentioned it in a blog post.
#
aaronpk
"move somewhere else"? not sure what you mean
[campegg] joined the channel
#
[campegg]
I'm seeing some possibly theme-related weirdnesses with images; on pages with the big hero images (like https://indieweb.org/Getting_Started), the hero breaks out of the main content area and partially covers the tools sidebar.
#
c​apjamesg
I think we should have the contents on another page, then that page be the warning.
#
aaronpk
weird, that's just a regular mediawiki file embed
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Might be best to continue using ‘old’ Vector theme as the default theme for the site (i.e. for logged out users), then make your own personal theme the new Vector, fix the customisations/issues on the homepage etc., then once those fixes are in place (and work with both themes) switch to the new Vector version as being the default? (If that makes any sort of sense…)
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /Getting_Started (+6) "change img to 800px until we can figure out why it's defaulting to the native image size"
(view diff)
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Having this new theme available is great though, as can make fixes against that now, whereas before it wasn’t possible!
#
aaronpk
well it's weird
#
aaronpk
because this is still the vector 2022 theme, just like before
#
aaronpk
this is just the new version of the vector 2022
#
aaronpk
so i can't switch back to the old version because it's all called vector 2022
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
No, I mean Vector legacy (2010)
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
:face_with_spiral_eyes:
#
[campegg]
Thats… annoying 😬
#
aaronpk
that hasn't been the default in many years
#
aaronpk
on our wiki
#
aaronpk
i _might_ be able to take the old vector 2022 skin and name it something else
#
aaronpk
but, not sure if it will work with the new mediawiki
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
I think it has… if you switch to it as your user theme, you’ll see. I think ‘Vector’ means multiple things
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk++ for working through all this.
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk++
#
Loqi
aaronpk has 31 karma in this channel over the last year (108 in all channels)
#
[campegg]
[aaronpk] I'm not familiar with how MW themes work, but is there a way to add custom CSS to set the max-width of images to 100% or something along those lines?
[pfefferle] joined the channel
#
aaronpk
the wiki was previously on an old version of Vector 2022
#
aaronpk
now it is on the new version of Vector 2022
#
aaronpk
we haven't used Vector 2010 (legacy) in years
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
If I visit the IndieWeb wiki on the Wayback Machine from November, I get this
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
If I select Vector 2010 (Legacy) as my user theme, I see this
#
m​attbcool
Thanks for setting up events here as well and giving the discord some love. ❤️
#
IWDiscord
<m​attbcool#0>
#
m​attbcool
Are reactions and message history intentionally disabled?
#
c​apjamesg
Message history should only be disabled in #indieweb-chat.
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /MediaWiki:Common.css (+54) "hide login link"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
This is to leave room for informal discussion that's not logged anywhere.
#
artlung.com
edited /performance (-239) "Removed the dead icons which were showing"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
it looks like maybe Vector changed which version of it is the default
#
aaronpk
the config doesn't specify 2010 vs 2022
#
m​attbcool
really impressed with the bridging going on here. 👍
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk is the magician behind the bridges.
[schmarty] joined the channel
#
aaronpk
hold pleas
#
aaronpk
hold please
#
aaronpk
well that's not going to work
#
aaronpk
ok, i had to add a new config option to tell it to use legacy vector (2010)
#
aaronpk
now we're back to 2010 being the default
#
aaronpk
test << test
#
Loqi
ok, I added "[[test]]" to the "See Also" section of /test https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=92298&oldid=89923
[Al_Abut] and [manton] joined the channel
#
aaronpk
[campegg]: looks like this version of vector-2010 doesn't have the css rule that sets max-width on images
#
aaronpk
wow they moved all the files around even for vector-2010
#
aaronpk
now it's all mustache templates too, even for the legacy skin
#
aaronpk
well my hack for adding p-summary isn't going to work anymore
#
aaronpk
oh wait
#
aaronpk
what are building blocks?
#
Loqi
🧱🔩 Building blocks are key design-patterns, technologies, and methods for building and improving your independent website https://indieweb.org/building_blocks
[snarfed] and angelo joined the channel
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /MediaWiki_customizations (+555) "add notes on skin customization for microformats"
(view diff)
#
aaronpk
ok i think things are stabilized now
#
www.vzqk50.com
edited /indieweb-carnival (+40) "Grammar adjustments"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
Thank you!!!
#
aaronpk
if you see any more glitches please let me know here
[Jo] joined the channel
#
www.vzqk50.com
created /User:Www.vzqk50.com (+544) "Create page"
(view diff)
#
www.vzqk50.com
edited /User:Www.vzqk50.com (+2) "Fix formatting"
(view diff)
[aciccarello] joined the channel
#
[aciccarello]
Love all this discussion
#
[aciccarello]
It was a way back but I feel the tension of zoom chat vs onboarding people.
#
[aciccarello]
I'd vote to keep zoom chat disabled since messages are more likely to get missed but improving the communication about where communication happens.
#
aaronpk
this increase in discord usage makes me really want to figure out how to get the users to join as proper IRC users instead of everything coming through the IWDiscord user
#
c​apjamesg
I would like that too.
#
c​apjamesg
It makes the logs harder to read.
#
aaronpk
i don't remember why it isn't working
#
c​apjamesg
How does the bridge work?
gRegor joined the channel
#
gRegor
aaronpk++ for vector updates! awesome!
#
Loqi
aaronpk has 32 karma in this channel over the last year (109 in all channels)
#
gRegor
Re: Zoom chat, maybe we could enable it only for hosts so hosts can drop links to chat and etherpad?
#
c​apjamesg
That would solve the problem.
[jeremycherfas] joined the channel
#
[jeremycherfas]
Amazing work everyone. More than 300 messages in scroll back, and then to see the changes happening as I worked slowly forward. I hope the image width can be fixed for mobile.
#
gRegor
I'm experimenting on that. I think this might work in a way that doesn't impact explicitly sized File: tags:
#
gRegor
`.mw-default-size img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; }`
#
gregorlove.com
created /User:Gregorlove.com/vector-2022.css (+55) "attempt responsive images only for .mw-default-size"
(view diff)
#
gRegor
That seems to work on https://indieweb.org/Ello which has several larger images
#
[jeremycherfas]
Not on my mobile, where there are three images in a row.
#
gregorlove.com
edited /Ello (+249) "past tense, site-death date, History section with Andy Baio's in-depth post"
(view diff)
to2ds joined the channel
#
gRegor
That CSS update only applies to my wiki account
#
gRegor
From https://indieweb.org/Special:Preferences > Appearance > Vector (2022) > Custom CSS link
#
gRegor
Just experimenting on my account, but once we find something that works well we can apply it for all Vector 2022 users
#
[jeremycherfas]
Cool [Gregor]++
#
Loqi
[Gregor] has 35 karma in this channel over the last year (86 in all channels)
#
[jeremycherfas]
Login on the home page takes me to special page login, where I have to click log in again. Is there any way to avoid the extra click?
#
www.jeremycherfas.net
edited /&yet (-6) "Change from About page (404) to home page. No IndieWeb relevance that I could see; probably worth deleting the page."
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
We should delete that.
#
[jeremycherfas]
Be my guest. I was just playing with Special pages.
gRegor joined the channel
#
www.svenknebel.de
deleted /&yet "content was: "'''<dfn>[http://andyet.com &yet]</dfn>''' is different kind of consulting company who builds software for people first.""
to2ds joined the channel
#
gRegor
I think &yet was a venue / sponsor in the past?
#
gRegor
Speaking of, aaronpk, updated theme doesn't have past sponsors in the footer anymore. Maybe that's OK and we set up a page for past sponsors?
#
gRegor
what is sponsors
#
cali-iwc
Created https://indieweb.org/events/2024-01-17-hwc-pacific. Please review the page to ensure the document is correctly formatted and remove any unnecessary text.
#
cali.moe
created /events/2024-01-17-hwc-pacific (+4567) "Created event page using IndieWeb events / Etherpad archiver"
(view diff)
barnaby joined the channel
#
Loqi
[Event Updated] gregorlove.com updated "Jan 17, 2024 6:00pm Homebrew Website Club - Pacific" changed description "+wiki notes" https://events.indieweb.org/event/562/history/1556/diff
to2ds and [tantek] joined the channel
#
[tantek]
what is IndieWeb relevant
#
Loqi
It looks like we don't have a page for "IndieWeb relevant" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "IndieWeb relevant is ____", a sentence describing the term)
to2ds joined the channel
#
loqi.me
created /indieweb_relevant (+42) "prompted by [tantek] and redirect added by [tantek]"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, trust me you do not want to deal with a wiki open to "anyone" contributing. wasted way too many hours with spammers & trolls on the microformats wiki for years because of this until we locked down account creation
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, the short reasoning is this: anyone *can* participate in the community already in multiple ways, here in chat, by joining events, by contributing to the Etherpads *during* events, etc. What all these have in common is that such "any one" has to contribute in real time in a place where there are other people actively around to help correct behavior, or if not there is abuse, quickly & easily kick them out
#
[tantek]
if someone only wants to the contribute to the wiki without showing up in chat or an event, that's a bit suspicious frankly
#
[tantek]
we have also had things go poorly even when occasionally (rarely) someone with domain just shows up and starts making random wiki edits WITHOUT first saying hi in chat or otherwise being some place we can have a two-way conversation to help onboard them to the community etc.
#
[tantek]
you don't need to edit the wiki to /start or ask questions to setup your own domain and identity.
#
c​apjamesg
That makes sense.
#
[tantek]
and if someone doesn't want to do the work to setup their own domain, how can we trust them to do the work to /wikify in an /indieweb_relevant way?
#
[tantek]
if someone is not motivated enough to help themselves with their own personal domain (even with help from people in chat, or people at an event), this is probably not a community for them
#
aaronpk
gRegor: oh yeah I forgot about that customization too. I think at this point we should stick to listing sponsors on event pages and the /sponsor page, not in the footer
#
aaronpk
I've actually been getting a non-trivial number of requests from people to "sponsor" us in exchange for a link in the footer, from websites that are very clearly things we do not want to link to
#
gRegor
Makes sense
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, interesting. perhaps we should iterate on our sponsor guidelines instead?
#
aaronpk
that too
#
[tantek]
and for now, maybe include a time window for the footer? like has sponsored an actual in-person IndieWebCamp in the past 5 years (that would include folks in the year pre-panini)
#
aaronpk
actually i think we already have a time limit in the policy?
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, somewhere on the wiki I believe we captured the reasoning for why you should setup your domain before contributing to the wiki, I'll see if I can find it
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, lastly, there IS a way for "anyone" to contribute to the IndieWeb wiki, IF they care enough to learn how to be a good wiki contributor citizen (read /wikify)
#
[tantek]
if you do truly care about wikifying within the norms of the community, you will read /wikify thoroughly
#
[tantek]
if you read /wikify thoroughly, you will discover how to contribute to the wiki via chat (I don't need to repeat or reference here because people here generally know what I'm talking about)
#
c​apjamesg
I think this fits in with what I was touching on yesterday about who the IndieWeb community is.
#
c​apjamesg
The wiki is obviously an important part -- dare I say the central point -- of the community.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, the higher level point here is that this is community is not "Wikipedia for the independent web" this community is literally about what it says right there on the home page, what folks like [Paul_Robert_Ll] were quoting in screenshots of what comes up when you search in a search engine for what is the indieweb
#
c​apjamesg
I see there being communities on two ends of a barbell right now: (i) retro web communities, and; (ii) more technical communities where the bar for participation is higher.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, the wiki is there to serve the community's goals.
#
[tantek]
if all someone wants to do is wikify, direct them to Wikipedia
#
c​apjamesg
I feel like the group that's missing is someone who wants to start a website but doesn't know how. We don't see many people in chat come with that ask. I wonder why.
#
[tantek]
from the home page: "The IndieWeb is a community of independent and personal websites" — that's pretty clear
#
[tantek]
so if you don't have an independent / personal website, your first step is to get one setup, which there are instructions on the wiki to help you do, and people in chat to help you do
#
c​apjamesg
There is a difference between a stated purpose and the vibe of a community.
#
c​apjamesg
Several people have said that the IndieWeb is a more technical space.
#
[tantek]
capajamesg, a community isn't about "vibes", that's a social club
#
[tantek]
a community is about shared values
#
[tantek]
and that too is summarized very clear on the home page
#
[tantek]
also in the all the search results and screenshots that everyone was sharing about "What is the IndieWeb"
#
[tantek]
"… based on the principles of: owning your domain and using it as your primary online identity, publishing on your own site first (optionally elsewhere), and owning your content"
#
[tantek]
per English semantics, literally in that order
#
[tantek]
so if someone is *not* prioritizing owning their domain and using it as their primary online identity, this is probably not the community for them
#
c​apjamesg
When you join a community, you usually pick up on a lot of signals. In the Write the Docs community, it's pretty clear after lurking for a few days that thoughtful questions are the core of the community, that the main method of discussion is Slack, and that people are open to all sorts of questions from diagramming to word choice.
#
c​apjamesg
Here, I think there is a signal that participation may be easier with technical aptitude (which isn't the case, but it would be easy to think that given that our discussions are mostly between technology professionals and often include technical language).
#
[tantek]
you shouldn't have to "pick up on a lot of signals" to understand a community. that's why we summarize right there on the home page. there shouldn't be such guesswork. a community where you have to "pick up on a lot of signals" is a community that has a higher barrier to entry
#
c​apjamesg
I think the Loqi bot in #indieweb does a good job of steering people in the right direction.
#
[aciccarello]
I do think that capjamesg is touching on something. The first impressions people get of the IndieWeb is more technical than what people experience when they join a HWC. Related to our discussions at IWC SD too.
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] Would you say that the IndieWeb is the ideal place for someone without a website, and without technical experience, to come to discuss websites?
#
[tantek]
"given that our discussions are mostly between technology professionals and often include technical language" <-- yes, because we have cultural inertia from the founding of the community where you HAD TO be technically adept to set everything up. now you can use http://micro.blog or omg.lol and skip all the technical jargon
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, this is also why it's a constant effort to steer jargon talk out of #indieweb
#
[tantek]
and frankly it's the most long-running members who keep triggering Loqi in that regard. people are human and take a long time to learn
#
c​apjamesg
"we have cultural inertia" - exactly my point. How do we overcome that?
#
[tantek]
there are also folks who are in denial that lots of jargon they use is anti-welcoming
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, keep making #indieweb chat friendly
#
[tantek]
*more friendly
#
[tantek]
and less technical jargony
#
c​apjamesg
Agreed re: anti-welcoming and jargon.
#
c​apjamesg
When you know what tree traversal is and have been doing it for a while, it feels easy to you.
#
c​apjamesg
But you forget that the first time you read about it, tree traversal probably seemed really difficult.
#
[tantek]
so even when people bring up RSS, because that's what the old guard used informally as meaning "news", keep nudging them to #indieweb-dev
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, re: "ideal place for someone without a website, and without technical experience, to come to discuss websites?" websites in general no. this is not a generic web dev community for folks doing web dev without their own websites. there are other places for that
#
aaronpk
and when people argue that RSS has entered the vocabulary of non-developers, just remember that you hear "subscribe wherever you get your podcasts", not "subscribe to our podcast's RSS feed"
#
[tantek]
this is why RSS is in jargon
#
c​apjamesg
Sorry, I should have been clearer: Would you say that the IndieWeb is the ideal place for someone without a website, and without technical experience, to come to discuss *personal* websites?
#
c​apjamesg
We talk a lot about standards here like Webmention, microformats, etc.
#
c​apjamesg
Which enable you to do a given task.
#
[tantek]
we talk a lot about standards in #indieweb-dev. we should not be doing that in #indieweb
#
[tantek]
lots of the "usuals" here keep making that mistake, bringing up Webmention, microformats in main as it were
#
[tantek]
every time you see someone do it, please help redirect the conversation to #indieweb-dev, yes even before Loqi does
#
aaronpk
"webmention" is right on the edge because of what [schmarty] has written about previously, that some people use "webmention" to mean the end user experience of seeing responses on their post, not the actual protocol itself
#
c​apjamesg
That is true.
#
[tantek]
"pingback" had the same problem, and we identified as a problem, and moved on
#
c​apjamesg
pingback--
#
Loqi
pingback has -1 karma in this channel over the last year (-2 in all channels)
#
[aciccarello]
To me webmention is one of the most frequent points of confusion I've seen
#
[aciccarello]
It happened just this week
#
[tantek]
this is why we say things like peer to peer (or site to site) comments
#
[tantek]
IMO saying things like "webmention UX" is just as "bad" as saying "federation UX" or "fediverse UX"
#
[tantek]
those terms are also jargon (federation, fediverse), and ALSO lead to a lot of confusion
#
[schmarty]
definitely a plumbing term that has grown to eat several unrelated concepts. i think because the name is too good relative to the narrow scope of what the tech covers. :}
#
[aciccarello]
For reference, this is what I was thinking about https://cosocial.ca/@jszym/111755537712365504
#
Loqi
[preview] [Joseph Szymborski :qcca:] Everything on the #IndieWeb wiki looks insanely cool, and there is a lot of documentation, but am I the only one who hasn't a clue how to adopt 99% of what is on there?#ActivityPub and #Fedi might be hard for folks to grok at first, but the on-ramp f...
#
c​apjamesg
And this is definitely not an isolated thread.
#
[tantek]
that's kind of funny because Webmention is much simpler, shorter, and easier to read / grok than ActivityPub
#
Loqi
[preview] [Lord Matt ✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️] @jszym You are not alone. I'm the fool who creates CMS as a hobby and IndieWeb might as well be 30% Spanish and 42% Zulu for all I can understand it. Cool but beats me how to make it work.
#
[aciccarello]
To schmarty's comment, I think they are including other concepts in "Webmention"
#
c​apjamesg
I think pushing more people to our chat is helpful because then we can say "hey, we're here to help."
#
[tantek]
we've previous identified that a "getting started for developers" would be helpful that walks web devs through this
#
[tantek]
that's a very specific / special audience
#
[tantek]
that's not the broader audience that capjamesg is talking about
#
[tantek]
"fool who creates CMS as a hobby" is not the audience capjamesg is talking about
#
c​apjamesg
Yeah.
#
c​apjamesg
The considerations are different for developers.
#
[aciccarello]
True, but if the IndieWeb seems too technical for fool who creates CMS as a hobby it tells me things look even more technical for non devs
#
c​apjamesg
This is the second account I have read this week of a software engineer being discouraged by the technical nature of this community.
#
[tantek]
aciccarello, that reasoning doesn't follow for one very big reason
#
gRegor
iirc, I tried to nudge Lord Matt to join #indieweb-dev to discuss more, though I don't think they have. I'm acquainted with them from the NucleusCMS community we both were part of years ago.
#
gRegor
what is open mentions
#
Loqi
Open Mentions is a syndication service organized into topics to help with content discovery https://indieweb.org/Open_Mentions
#
[tantek]
web devs often assume that they already "know everything" or that they should be able to universally "pick up and do anything" and when something outside their existing technical model of the world comes along, they are frustrated much more quickly than "non devs" because they expect everything technical to be "easy" for them
#
gRegor
He made that^
#
[tantek]
I believe this phenomenon is unfortunately associated with the rise of the term "full stack"
#
gRegor
(just noting it, no judgement "join our community" or "join our chat" etc. might be overwhelming, I get it, haha. Just trying to be welcoming.)
#
[aciccarello]
ha, that's an interesting observation. I can't say I disagree.
#
[tantek]
people wanting to be "full stack", then assuming/asserting they are "full stack", and then anything new that is different technically that challenges them must be wrong because such things couldn't possible exist for a "full stack" engineer
#
c​apjamesg
I understand that perspective, but I think we have to be careful in assuming it.
#
c​apjamesg
Assume positive intent.
#
gRegor
Only full stack I want is pancakes
#
[tantek]
there is no such thing as "full stack". it's an extremely naïve term that by its very framing assumes that it is even possible, and also implies a static nature to technology, which is also obviously false
#
c​apjamesg
Product Hunt tried to make a site that let you showcase the software you used. It was called Your Stack. They used pancakes as the mascot: https://yourstack.com/
#
gRegor
Haha, love it
#
c​apjamesg
It was actually an amazing community.
#
[tantek]
"full stack" implies "oh I've learned everything I need to know" which is a very bad attitude/outlook and how you end up being bad at learning new things
#
aaronpk
you're only a full stack dev if you also wrote the OS your code is running on :P
#
c​apjamesg
Haha
#
[tantek]
aaronpk, I mean at least we aren't asking people to dig up their own sand, and press & etch their own silicon wafers
#
c​apjamesg
Before I knew about the <section> tag, I knew Next.js.
#
aaronpk
exactly
#
c​apjamesg
Which is to say that someone may think they know what they need about the web, but that doesn't mean they aren't open to changing.
#
c​apjamesg
In hindsight, that time spent learning Next.js would have been spent so much more effectively by learning HTML and vanilla JS.
#
[tantek]
indeed, capjamesg, ask a "full stack" developer if they can name all the HTML tags (they can't, I mean almost no one can, I wouldn't count myself in that either, and I've directly worked on the spec for years).
#
[tantek]
if you can't name the "full" set of HTML tags, you clearly aren't a "full stack" *web* developer
#
[tantek]
similarly CSS etc.
#
[tantek]
the framing of "full" is wrong.
#
[tantek]
as a method of self-description, unless you're talking about being done eating
#
c​apjamesg
This would make for an interesting blog post.
#
c​apjamesg
But we have deviated from the main topic which is barriers for entry.
#
[tantek]
anyway there's an attitude by a certain subset of webdevs that is of the sort of "why do I have to learn new things? I already know how to do everything" that's counterproductive and they usually run into problems with indieweb building blocks because their own assumption of already being "full" or "knowing what they need about the web" gets in their way
#
[tantek]
this has nothing to do with IndieWeb
#
[tantek]
this has to do with people being their worst obstacle
#
[tantek]
and the IndieWeb community is not a therapy forum for webdevs are "full [of themselves] stack"
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, such webdevs are their own worst barriers, for entry to learning new things in general
#
c​apjamesg
The moral of this story was the IndieWeb was where I learned more about the web.
#
c​apjamesg
Of course there are going to be people who know what they know and don't want to explore more, but that's only one persona.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, it seems to be a very common "new generation" webdev persona unfortunately, and like I said, highly correlated (obviously not 100%) with those that self-describe as "full stack"
#
[tantek]
which is a lot of people
#
c​apjamesg
The main unanswered question is the extent to which we want to optimize for people who are not technical.
#
c​apjamesg
I'm not really sure who is serving that group right now.
#
aaronpk
wasn't that the whole discussion above just now?
#
c​apjamesg
What was the conclusion?
#
c​apjamesg
Maybe I haven't processed it yet.
#
aaronpk
keep pushing dev talk out of the main channel
#
c​apjamesg
Ah.
#
c​apjamesg
Is that enough?
#
[aciccarello]
I think the wiki needs some refining too
#
gRegor
"Could someone who has never built a website understand what you’re about to say/ask?"
#
aaronpk
well it's certianly a start, and also currently a problem, so let's start there
#
c​apjamesg
If people feel discouraged about the high degree of technical discourse we have even though we consistently nudge people to #dev, it feels like there is more to do.
#
c​apjamesg
gRegor good quote.
#
c​apjamesg
I guess what I'm reading here is the IndieWeb should be for _anyone_ who is interested in personal websites.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, also the very framing of "people who are not technical" is unwelcoming
#
[tantek]
that's where the problem starts
#
[tantek]
the framing of "people who are not technical" is a form of othering. and othering is unwelcoming
#
gRegor
what is welcoming
#
Loqi
Welcoming is how we as a community welcome new members to our community https://indieweb.org/welcoming
#
gRegor
taking a fresh look at that, it's been a while
#
[tantek]
I (and aaronpk) and others have said this many times so maybe we need to harshly define it on the wiki so we can cite it
#
[tantek]
this is NOT about being technical or not. this is about not wanting to be bothered with a bunch of admintax, hobbytax, tech ceremony, or what have you
#
[tantek]
I'm very "technical" and I don't want to bother with all the CLI nonsense
#
c​apjamesg
Agreed re: the specific language. It is tough and something I need to do better on.
#
c​apjamesg
I think people who are interested in coding a site and who aren't interested in coding a site are two separate needs, however.
#
[tantek]
aciccarello, yes, making the wiki more welcoming (less jargon dependent) is a very longterm and ongoing project and could use help
#
aaronpk
"people who are not interested in coding a site" is not the same as "non-technical"
#
c​apjamesg
Indeed.
#
c​apjamesg
I don't like that I used non-technical. You shouldn't define a group by what they can't do.
#
[tantek]
also different: "people who are not interested in typing a bunch of magic spells into a terminal window"
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, precisely
#
tantek.com
restored /&yet "&yet is IndieWeb relevant as fairly discoverable from its "What links here" https://indieweb.org/Special:WhatLinksHere?target=%26yet&namespace="
#
[tantek]
we have a lot of work to do to copy edit all the uses of "non technical" in the wiki
#
aaronpk
oh dear
#
[tantek]
it's a meme that's been around way too long
#
[tantek]
just like uses of "just" (that trivialize) and "simple"
#
c​apjamesg
I have a blog post about that one.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg same
#
aaronpk
well then, let's just simply remove all the instances of "non-technical" from the wiki
#
c​apjamesg
I like that idea.
#
tantek.com
edited /&yet (+13) "stub, sponsored IWC 2014, explicit IndieWeb relevance in dfn"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
aaronpk hah that would make it even less understandable
#
[tantek]
oh I get the sarcasm with use of "just simply" now.
#
[tantek]
still waking up
#
c​apjamesg
😄
#
[tantek]
a little slow on the implied /s
#
c​apjamesg
I'm starting to get tired now.
#
c​apjamesg
😄
#
c​apjamesg
> I get it! Simply avoid using "basically", "easily", and "just" in documentation! 😂
#
c​apjamesg
Love it.
#
Loqi
[preview] [Tantek Çelik] Are there other words like: "basically" "just" "simply" used in explanations/instructions to obscure actual complexity or difficulty? Is there a name for such words? They often shame the reader as a side-effect (if it’s not easy, it must be my fa...
#
c​apjamesg
Oh Loqi.
#
c​apjamesg
I have one more thing for now: how can we improve the diversity of members in our community? We do well with this at in person events in terms of gender, age, etc. but the chat feels a bit different.
#
c​apjamesg
For a time in this week's HWC it was six men talking (in the first ~10-20 mins IIRC, before everyone had joined).
#
c​apjamesg
And to be clear this is not the case in some other communities I'm in (docs and retro web).
#
[tantek]
to-do << create a page on [[non-technical]] defining it as an unhelpful & unwelcoming othering phrase per discussion in https://chat.indieweb.org/meta/2024-01-18#t1705610390349800
#
Loqi
ok, I added "create a page on [[non-technical]] defining it as an unhelpful & unwelcoming othering phrase per discussion in https://chat.indieweb.org/meta/2024-01-18#t1705610390349800" to the "See Also" section of /to-do https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=92316&oldid=92057
#
[tantek]
to-do << go through the wiki and copy edit / repair / replace uses of "non-technical" or "non technical" with more helpful & [[welcoming]] text, leaving archived meeting/session notes as-is because history is what it was https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?search=%22non-technical%22+%22non+technical%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=1
#
Loqi
ok, I added "go through the wiki and copy edit / repair / replace uses of "non-technical" or "non technical" with more helpful & [[welcoming]] text, leaving archived meeting/session notes as-is because history is what it was https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?search=%22non-technical%22+%22non+technical%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=1" to the "See Also" section of /to-do https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=92317&oldid=92316
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, do retro web folks not have their own websites? having your own website is often described as "retro"
#
c​apjamesg
They do! But more on Neocities / shared hosting sites.
#
[tantek]
yeah that's a difference between in-person communities limited by proximity interactions and online communities, especially intentional online communities that as part of their goal seek to be more /welcoming
#
c​apjamesg
To what does "that" refer?
#
c​apjamesg
Diversity or the retro web?
#
[tantek]
capjamesg did you see the reply from [jeremycherfas]? oh hey maybe not because it's not the logs
#
[tantek]
[jeremycherfas] looks like when you reply-in-thread in Slack it no longer makes it to the logs or IRC / chat bridges
#
[tantek]
capjamesg it was in reference to [jeremycherfas] saying "In my understanding, that would be all real-life actual human communities, where the unarticulated norms and conventions are what defines the community. You pick them up, and slowly feel like you belong, or you don’t and either give up or accept outsider status." which was in reply to my post about "you shouldn't have to "pick up on a lot of signals" to understand a community."
#
c​apjamesg
That didn't come through?
#
[tantek]
since implicit in my original statement was a welcoming online community
#
c​apjamesg
[jeremycherfas]' comment was in a thread in Slack.
#
c​apjamesg
Perhaps that did something?
#
[tantek]
no it did not
#
c​apjamesg
In any case, thank you for highlighting.
#
Loqi
[preview] [IWDiscord] <c​apjamesg#0> They do! But more on Neocities / shared hosting sites.
#
[tantek]
and he said it at 13:15 PST
#
[tantek]
(21:15 UTC)
#
c​apjamesg
I see it in Slack, not the logs.
#
[tantek]
correct
#
c​apjamesg
There is something to be said about "lurking" in an online community.
#
c​apjamesg
I sometimes sit quiet to see what's going on before doing anything.
#
[jeremycherfas]
Sorry about not coming through to logs; beyond my non-technicality.
#
c​apjamesg
No need to apologize!
#
aaronpk
Oh dear
#
[tantek]
!tell [aaronpk] Slack threaded replies no longer make it to IRC/bridges or to the archives, e.g. scroll-up to 21:15 UTC in Slack as compared to the logs for today (2014-01-18)
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
#
aaronpk
messages in threads used to come through as a new message
#
[tantek]
[jeremycherfas] yup, not your fault, it used to work
#
aaronpk
slack must have changed something again
#
[jeremycherfas]
The thing is, I actually like some of the things on Slack on mobile. Desktop I’m happy with my irc client, Textual. Never had as good an experience on mobile. Suggestions for iOS welcome.
#
nicksimson.com
edited /User:Nicksimson.com (+343) "added back links to user page"
(view diff)
#
c​apjamesg
Oooh, that's cool nsmsn[d] !
#
n​smsn
I copied that from Chris Aldrich (boffosocko.com)'s user page
#
aaronpk
i didn't know you could do that
#
gRegor
nice!
#
n​smsn
I changed my profile pic in the wiki after I changed platforms last year, and it seems like my pic isn't showing up in sparklines anymore?
#
aaronpk
omg my list is way too long
#
n​smsn
^ you can set a limit on this line: {{Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Username.com|limit=1000}}
#
gRegor
nsmsn: the sparkline is a separate template with an image URL, you can update that in https://indieweb.org/Template:nsmsn
#
aaronpk
how are they sorted?
#
nicksimson.com
edited /Template:nsmsn (+24) "updated sparkline pic"
(view diff)
#
n​smsn
Brilliant! Thanks, gRegor!
#
gRegor
welcome!
#
IWDiscord
<n​smsn#0>
#
n​smsn
aaronpk, I think contributions are sorted in chronological order...my first link is chat-names and my recent ones include this week's Galactic and Pacific HWC events.
#
n​smsn
Maybe you can adapt it to be reverse-chron, so it shows your latest activity first?
#
aaronparecki.com
edited /User:Aaronparecki.com (+251) "add what links here"
(view diff)
#
gregorlove.com
edited /&yet (+38) "https link, SA /how-to-sponsor"
(view diff)
#
gRegor
Just realized June 28 will be 10 years since my first IWC, https://indieweb.org/2014
#
aaronpk
⏰🪰
#
paulrobertlloyd.com
edited /User:Paulrobertlloyd.com/vector-2022.css (+99) "Support Vector legacy styles"
(view diff)
#
[tantek]
Oh my goodness the wiki looks good on portrait mobile view (iOS)! 😭 😭 😭
#
aaronpk
wait what
#
aaronpk
how did that change?
to2ds joined the channel
#
[tantek]
aaronpk I bet it changed because of some meta tags that stopped iOS (and others) from zooming into the page so much automatically and making the "pixel" width artificially small and then screwing up the layout which was not designed for such narrow widths
#
aaronpk
i guess they did rewrite the whole vector-2010 skin in this update so that seems likely
#
[tantek]
Gosh I don't know how we missed that as a possible "quick fix"
#
c​apjamesg
What can we do to change the home page?
#
[tantek]
So are we done? What else is broken?
#
[tantek]
capjamesg is change the goal?
#
c​apjamesg
I mean a bigger redesign. We have all those wiki pages on improving the home page.
#
aaronpk
well ideally we could get the new vector-2022 skin to work so that the text isn't tiny on mobile
#
c​apjamesg
If someone wanted to raise their hand to action on those, what would be the process?
#
[tantek]
capjamesg various folks have made partial attempts. No one has made anything widely appealing to the community
#
[tantek]
The myth of someone coming in and singlehandedly fixing something "just" needing a good "process"
#
[tantek]
We have succeeded in past redesigns by finding a set of folks that are good and open to working collaboratively
#
[tantek]
And it has required in-person iteration
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, if you look at the three column page effort, you will see there is plenty of areas individuals can help, mostly with collecting, uploading, documenting screenshots of existing good designs
#
[tantek]
What is three column
#
Loqi
2019/homepage is a project to update the IndieWeb community homepage in 2019, in particular with a three column layout designed for onboarding three common sets of visitors and new IndieWeb community members https://indieweb.org/three_column
#
[tantek]
capjamesg do you see "NEED" in all caps there?
#
gRegor
Meanwhile, Paul's edits are actually trying out those fixes :)
#
[tantek]
Those are different efforts gRegor
#
[tantek]
The three column design would have VERY different content than the current home page
#
gRegor
I was referring to above, before three column was mentioned
#
[aciccarello]
Would a way forward on the homepage be an experimental page?
#
[aciccarello]
I'm not sure how that works with mediawiki
#
[tantek]
aciccarello not in our experience so far
#
[tantek]
Solo design experiments rarely make seomethjng broadly appealing to the community
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Wow, user namespace edits also appear in this channel 😊
#
[aciccarello]
My thought is, iterate on a design until people are happy with it replacing the homepage. I'm not sure what that threshold would be though.
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Am just trying to get together a set of fixes for the _current_ homepage in the new vector theme, but yeah, will undoubtedly end up with my own separate design for the homepage too 😂
#
gRegor
[Paul_Robert_Ll], yep! :) you can check the minor edit box if you want to suppress them, but not a big deal either way
#
[Paul_Robert_Ll]
Yeah, will tick that box from now on until I have something a bit closer to show!
#
[tantek]
aciccarello that's my point. In the past, no series of design iterations by a single person has resulted in something broadly appealing
#
[tantek]
The path that has worked has been collaborative iterations that incorporates ideas & feedback from a small group that has the time, has visual, design, technical skills, and can spend a few in-person sessions doing so
#
[tantek]
For a while we got occasional visual-minded folks showing up with a grand vision for fixing the IndieWeb site, that, to be blunt, did not have a compelling design for their personal sites
#
[tantek]
Or sometimes even having a personal site
#
[aciccarello]
I imagine everyone has their own list of which indieweb values are most important to them
#
[tantek]
The problem was, by what basis of confidence is someone asserting they can solve a complex design problem for the IndieWeb, when they haven't been able to solve a much simpler design problem for their own personal site?
#
[Al_Abut]
that’s a designer’s dilemma to be honest - trying to change a design that’s broadly appealing to an existing base while also trying to raise issues about first impressions to new audiences
#
[Al_Abut]
it’s not about colors or text, it’s about clear goals
#
[Al_Abut]
and making something the existing community broadly likes can also be groupthink and design by committee, which aims for comprehensiveness over clarity
#
[Al_Abut]
this isn’t a design critique or takedown, btw, just shedding light on how a designer thinks in case it’s helpful
#
[tantek]
This is why singlehanded design iterations on a community site are nearly always doomed to fail. The very act of doing it single-handedly violates the principle of being community minded
#
[Al_Abut]
maybe, but isn’t there also the principle of bringing something to the table to share and discuss
#
[Al_Abut]
otherwise people just talk past each other
#
[tantek]
Yes, already noted. See collaborative effort I mentioned above
#
[tantek]
Speaking of talking past each other ;)
#
[Al_Abut]
haha, well played
#
[tantek]
See "The path that has worked" above
#
[Al_Abut]
But moving past design process, I think a discussion about the goals is probably the underlying factor. It’s always easier to design something when you know what the intended outcomes are, or at least can even agree on what the existing problems are. I’m not getting that sense of alignment from some of the discussions - and maybe that’s ok! Everything’s in flux and exciting. Eternal September, etc.
#
[Al_Abut]
e.g. today I saw a tension between “how do we make the indieweb community more friendly and welcome, especially to non-devs” and “don’t spoil the existing good thing that we’ve got going by making the chat more obvious”
#
aaronpk
that's not exactly a fair characterization
#
[Al_Abut]
I’m explaining how it came across to me, I’m not trying to willfully misconstrue anything or advocating for a position
#
aaronpk
a lot of these things that look like intentional barriers are in place for two reasons: spam, and people who are extremely disruptive. spam is the main reason for web sign-in on the wiki for example.
#
aaronpk
the "extremely disruptive people" problem is a lot harder to combat, and unfortunately some of the countermeasures do also turn away completely reasonable people as well, so it's a constant balance
#
c​apjamesg
I wasn't around when the community was started, but I think our approach may need some revising.
#
c​apjamesg
There is so much talk about the social web, indie web (lowercase), personal websites, etc.
#
c​apjamesg
I can't recall seeing one "extremely disruptive" person.
#
c​apjamesg
And even then, that is a product of the moderation tools we have to hand.
#
aaronpk
capjamesg: that's because the countermeasures have been working
#
aaronpk
but i agree we should revisit things
#
c​apjamesg
If we have an IRC bridge, spam is a bigger problem. Discord, for example, has advanced moderation tools that build specifically for that.
#
c​apjamesg
(I'm not saying we should move to Discord haha. But I am saying that these assumptions are not based only on external factors.)
#
aaronpk
i'm not talking about disruptive as in spam
#
[Al_Abut]
part of the (healthy) split might be encapsulated as IWC vs Homebrew.
#
c​apjamesg
Maybe this is a "you won't understand until you see it" thing, but I struggle with this.
#
c​apjamesg
If you are too defensive against disruptive people, you get your eyes away from people who could make great contributors but maybe don't want to do as much work.
#
c​apjamesg
(as in, set up IndieAuth, create a user page, edit a wiki page, etc.)
#
[Al_Abut]
yes, exactly. it might be an inherent problem to some things that you have to try it to get it. from the product world, that’s why apple invests so heavily in their stores. you need to pick up a premium product to see if that’s something that moves you, like a sports car. and maybe communities have a similar dynamic - you have to join a meeting and see if you get the “whoa, I found my people” feeling I did. then it encourages you t
#
[Al_Abut]
deeper into the lore of the tribe, find out their various rituals, etc.
#
aaronpk
we _have_ revisited a lot of the measures over the years. it used to be for example that registering for an IWC required you to have a website and sign in
#
c​apjamesg
Candidly, I don't think, collectively, the IndieWeb experience is as welcoming as it could be.
#
c​apjamesg
If we look around at who participates, there is a bias toward people with technical skills. That isn't something that just happens. It is a product of how people feel when they encounter something.
#
[Al_Abut]
I can see how that’s true and have been holding my tongue because I don’t see an easy solution, e.g. I’m not sure that “attend a homebrew zoom to see if this is your speed” is something that scales
#
aaronpk
a lot of the principles reflect the filters that have been in place https://indieweb.org/principles#Key_Principles
#
[Al_Abut]
one thing we talked about at the SD camp was making a friendly short video, whether on the home page or get started or somewhere
#
aaronpk
what are videos about the indieweb?
#
Loqi
📺 Videos about the indieweb are a great way to get a quick visual introduction to what is the Indie Web, why we need it, and how you can make a difference for yourself, and others https://indieweb.org/videos_about_the_indieweb
#
[Al_Abut]
a short video can get across the emotional tone of the helpful friendly community in a way that’s async
#
[tantek]
capjamesg seriously? You have seen it, firsthand, in SocialCG
#
c​apjamesg
++
#
[Al_Abut]
some of the concerns were that it wouldn’t be diverse enough, and that’s totally valid
#
[tantek]
Y'all are making the umbrella mistake
#
aaronpk
haha i wasn't going to say it [tantek]
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] Why would this community regress to that?
#
aaronpk
you'd be surprised how quickly that can happen
#
c​apjamesg
I'm going to #indieweb-chat for the next message.
#
[Al_Abut]
(what’s the umbrella mistake?)
#
c​apjamesg
Why is the point of reference negative, though?
#
c​apjamesg
Should we not have the angle "we've seen how badly this can go, but we also know there are other communities that are thriving, so let's see what we can do!"
#
c​apjamesg
To join the Write the Docs community, I had to go to their website, click two links, and I was in their Slack. And now I read it every few days, have shared content, have contributed to discussions.
#
gRegor
It's two clicks to get to chat.indieweb.org and "join the chat" too. Maybe those could be more obvious, but just saying.
#
c​apjamesg
Yeah. Recency bias may be playing in to my response there.
gRegor-web joined the channel
#
gRegor-web
Hello from the web chat :)
#
c​apjamesg
But we did just change those links in the sidebar. The chat link was 10-12 links down.
#
aaronpk
a better comparison would be what does it take to start a Write the Docs meetup https://www.writethedocs.org/organizer-guide/meetups/starting/
#
c​apjamesg
Hello chat gRegor!
#
[tantek]
[Al_Abut] "I’m not getting wet, I don't need an umbrella" yes that's because you're using an umbrella to avoid getting wet in the rain or someone has held an umbrella for you.
#
[tantek]
You not getting wet doesn't mean it's not raining
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk I don't think so, because that's a non-standard path.
#
[tantek]
Another example: "Y2K problems & risks & catastrophies were overhyped! Nothing happened!" Yes that's because lots of folks put in a lot of hardwork rewriting tons of software & systems in preparation (they held the umbrellas)
#
c​apjamesg
There are at least 20k people in their Slack.
#
c​apjamesg
A very small percentage will be involved with event organizing.
#
c​apjamesg
(To be clear, a small percentage of those people are active users, too.)
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] I think it is important to respect what we have learned works while thinking about the future.
#
c​apjamesg
Another way to think about it: where do we want the IndieWeb to be in 10 years?
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, start with, where do you want your personal site to be in 10 years?
#
c​apjamesg
I would like the IndieWeb to be a place where people with no technical experience but who want to start a website come to us and we can help them. We have more diversity (that's something we need _now_). We continue with our cadence of great events.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, there's a lot of well understood and well documented risks to open communities and numerous examples of how things go wrong
#
[tantek]
I documented a bunch back in the day on the microformats wiki that I recommend you familiarize yourself with
#
[tantek]
I'll find the links
#
c​apjamesg
Thank you!
#
aaronpk
another aspect of having easier entry and a much larger community is that moderation becomes extremely important which requires a lot of time, which requires more people actively engaged in the moderator roles. plenty of documentation of how moderation tasks scale with other communities too
#
[tantek]
The reason y'all are not getting wet (much) here in this community is because a bunch of us suffered through many monsoons and have built structures & umbrellas accordingly
#
[tantek]
It's not because there are no storms
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk Agreed, wholeheartedly.
#
[Al_Abut]
not to be even denser than usual, but I’m, having trouble connecting the umbrella analogy with explaining first impressions of how indieweb seemed offputting until I met the people behind it
#
aaronpk
to be clear i'm not saying the current situation is optimal. we definitely should re-evaluate things periodically, and make adjustments where needed
#
c​apjamesg
aaronpk I'm saying the time is now 😄
#
[tantek]
see also, time to plan the next Summit
#
[tantek]
What is 2024
#
Loqi
✨ It would be great to organize an IndieWeb Summit 2024 if we are able to find a venue (possibly restarting in Portland, or nearby Seattle instead, or maybe another city/region like New York) and figure out what kind of Covid precautions would keep people reasonably safe, and set very clear expectations of what is expected of participants https://indieweb.org/2024
#
c​apjamesg
To Al's point, I think we need more (diverse) role models, too. Notably, this isn't something we make happen overnight. It requires trust and a lot of work. But it is a gap in this community and one with which I am not comfortable.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, what makes you think we haven't been putting in a lot of work over many years to grow more diverse role models?
#
[tantek]
It is a gap yes and it makes pretty much everyone I speak with uncomfortable. I don't anyone involved deeply here who is "comfortable" with that
#
c​apjamesg
I don't doubt, for a moment, that work has gone on. Through in person and online events, it is clear that an immense amount of effort is put into event organizing, making people feel welcome, answering questions, and being a resource.
#
c​apjamesg
But my question is why hasn't much changed?
#
[tantek]
Go look at the diversity of IWS 2019 as part of the effect of those efforts
#
[tantek]
Now compare to various HWC photos
#
[tantek]
And ask yourself why are those different
#
[tantek]
It has changed. It's gotten worse
#
c​apjamesg
What happened?
#
c​apjamesg
2019 was just before I joined.
#
c​apjamesg
I joined in early to mid 2020.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, go review organizers meetup notes for the 5 years leading up to 2019
#
gRegor
what is organizer
#
Loqi
Organizers Meetups (and Organizers Summits) are half-day events held before IndieWeb Summits, and often quarterly before IndieWebCamps, for anyone who wants to help organize an IndieWebCamp or Homebrew Website Club meetup, and especially for those have organized an IndieWeb event in the past two years https://indieweb.org/organizer
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] A direct answer from your experience would perhaps be more informative.
#
c​apjamesg
Skimming through some of these pages, there are amazing details.
#
c​apjamesg
"Lovi: i am brand new and i am surprised that i have things to say! first: fix your website (indieweb.org)! it's terse. needs more pictures. more accessible language. make it personal (e.g. to the hazards of using facebook, infographics about everyting, including "dangers of vertical silos"). Use-cases more accessible from front page"
#
c​apjamesg
Nice to see kid-friendliness mentioned!
#
gRegor
What are you quoting?
#
c​apjamesg
I'm looking through /Organizers too.
#
c​apjamesg
I guess, it's unclear with all these ideas -- and what looks like people excited about those ideas -- why we regressed in terms of diversity?
#
[tantek]
Ask yourself capjamesg how do you run a HWC Zoom, how do you do outreach for it, who do you invite?
#
c​apjamesg
I have written a few blog posts about it.
#
c​apjamesg
We used to promote on Twitter, but we stopped that.
#
c​apjamesg
I advertised it on Hacker News.
#
c​apjamesg
I mention it here in chat every week (that's more internal promotion).
#
[tantek]
Yes, reinforces existing community biases
#
c​apjamesg
I am hesitant to invite people if I think a discussion is going to end up in Webmention / microformats territory.
#
gRegor
I think direct, personal invites work best
#
c​apjamesg
I invited colleagues to the build a website in an hour events because that seemed more interesting to them. If it weren't for timing, at least one person would have showed up.
#
gRegor
aaronpk, "Error creating thumbnail: /bin/bash: line 1: convert: command not found
#
aaronpk
oh shoot
#
aaronpk
new server
#
gRegor
who dis?
#
c​apjamesg
[tantek] The truth is though that I don't know many people who would be interested. I will start promoting on Mastodon though!
#
aaronpk
gRegor: try now
#
gRegor
capjamesg, from https://indieweb.org/2019/Organizers#Summit_Planning_Improvements, "What if my existing network is not very diverse? Homework assignment to expand your circles! Not necessarily easily, requires work, but it is rewarding on its own."
#
gRegor
aaronpk, works! thx
#
c​apjamesg
That is easier said than done.
#
aaronpk
it literally says it's not easy 😇
#
gRegor
Yeah, there is no easy button for this
#
c​apjamesg
You're talking with someone for whom the only people he may talk with in a week are colleagues and people in the IndieWeb community.
#
c​apjamesg
(anxiety and loneliness suck)
#
[tantek]
gRegor++ for finding & citing that on the wiki
#
Loqi
gRegor has 36 karma in this channel over the last year (87 in all channels)
#
gRegor
https://indieweb.org/2020/Austin was pretty diverse, which I attribute to manton's and micro.blog's networks. Natalie and Pace's keynotes were great.
#
c​apjamesg
To be clear: I need help in promoting HWC. My social circles aren't that big, and that has, in the past, been something that has caused me a lot of pain.
#
c​apjamesg
That's why the extent to which I can invite people here is limited. Some of the people who I would invite have already seen the IndieWeb and decided it is not for them for various of the reasons listed above.
#
gRegor
I feel you, capjamesg. I'm in a similar life/work situation, and mental health stuff can be so hard. I hope my citing that didn't sound like extra pressure on you.
#
c​apjamesg
No, it's all good.
#
c​apjamesg
This is a _community_ responsibility.
#
[tantek]
capjamesg, thanks for vulnerably sharing. Here to help support. And you have answered some of your own community "why" questions that you have asked