gRegorI think we've tried to distinguish "indieweb friendly" on some wiki pages, since there are plenty of services that offer options that are good for portability, even if it doesn't involve control of the URLs
LoqiIndieWeb friendly refers to online services interoperating by supporting open formats, protocols, and IndieWeb building-blocks as well as enabling users to transition to their own personal sites, and an implementation guide for social networks to interconnect with the IndieWeb https://indieweb.org/friendly
[tantek]Blogger and Tumblr used to be just like Neocities and Bear Blog in that regard. As were many others from the Web 2.0 era which are long since defunct.
[tantek]If you don't own the domain, you don't own the website and it can (and evidence shows it will) be sold from underneath you and more often than shutdown
[tantek]Someone owns the Neocities TLD and similarly Bear blog. When they get bored or life happens or they get a really good offer and want to buy a house they will sell it, likely to an owner who will enshittify what you thought was yours. Like putting ads on it without your consent
[tantek]If you don't own your domain you don't own your permalinks and that means you can't migrate your interconnections with other indieweb sites. It's not portable
LoqiPosterous (.com) was a blogging silo that also used shortdomain post(.)ly and shut down 2013-04-30, just over a year after being acquired by Twitter on 2012-03-12 https://indieweb.org/Posterous
[tantek][capjamesg] rich formats support is necessary but not sufficient. GitHub supports a "backbone" of HTML or "plain text" (markdown flavored), does that mean you believe http://GitHub.io subdomains are personal websites?
[tantek]Yes that's a very strong statement. Not to be too morbid about it, however what happens when the owner passes and their heirs decide to sell the domain to someone because they have no interest or time to maintain it?
[tantek]Creator of Blaugust passed and the only reason we still have it this year is because it didn't depend on their domain. (A hashtag was good enough)
[capjamesg]My heart says that someone who is on Neocities and making a personal website is just as much a part of the IndieWeb as someone who owns a domain.
[capjamesg]It’s very possible, but notable that there are people coalescing around the idea of personal websites — and bring very creative in what they make — who are not using their own domains.
[capjamesg]I think another part of this is that you have firmly your own space. Like, Bear Blog lets you add your own CSS and people have made creative themes. Neocities lets you do full custom HTML, etc.
[tantek]Right people are repeating history that didn't experience the loss the first time around. Then eventually they will and they will be repeating what I'm saying to the next generation
[tantek]http://Micro.blog also enables such customizations and themes but you won't get Manton himself claiming that your microblog site is an indieweb site. Because he's lived through those losses
[tantek]That's really it. You don't own your permalinks on Neocities or bearblog or even http://micro.blog. Thought the latter two do commit to doing redirects for you which is a nice touch / improvement over past content hosting sites
[tantek]I do agree with recognizing and highlighting content hosting platforms that are migration-friendly. I think that's a very important distinction to call out
[capjamesg]I think the “indie” part of Neocities, etc. is that you have your own space where you can make things independent from large social platforms. I’m not saying trusting small services is a good thing in the long-term, but I think there are different definitions of “indie” of which we should be cognisant. If I see someone making a personal website in HTML/CSS that they use to express themselves, I consider them firmly part of the
[capjamesg]I might point out that having a domain is valuable for many reasons, and that not having one can cause problems, but I wouldn’t see them as being any less a part of the spirit of the IndieWeb without one.
[capjamesg]My argument is not that having a domain name is not useful, but that there are people who are using the term to refer more to the creative aspect of the web (which is something I think we should highlight more!).
[capjamesg]Also I have only been awake for 15 minutes so apologies if this could be better articulated. In about 4 minutes my alarm is going to go off 😂
[tantek]Except the indie / independence is fundamentally about ownership and control. And you have less of that on someone else's domain. ergo less indieweb whether in spirit or practice
[capjamesg]This may be flawed but the argument that comes to mind is I am not any less of a reader if I only use library books. I don’t technically own any of the books I am reading, and my library could close down (we fought it off for now though!), but I can still spend a few weeks with a book. In theory I could buy a book I first read in the library at any time from a bookshop to really own the book, but that means I’d need to pay something,
[capjamesg](The flaw in this argument I think, now I read it back, is that libraries don’t necessarily claim they are indie like we do; this is pre-tea James missing things 🙃 )
[capjamesg]If you are hosting a personal website on GitHub Pages, I think it’s also of the spirit of the IndieWeb because: (i) you made it; (ii) you get to update and change it in the way you want; (iii) you can move your data at any time. Everything you do in the time you use the service lets you experiment with what having a personal website means. This is all (if you want it to be) a creative endeavour.
[capjamesg]Your links could be taken from you at any time, which I agree is not indie, but, equally, all of that time has been spent making something that’s your own.
[tantek]Btw remember how people used to have "indieweb sites" on subdomains of Withknown .com? Amazingly indieeeb friendly with best of the industry POSSE support
[capjamesg]Where I could see a flaw in my logic is if Meta offered static site hosting tomorrow. I wouldn’t consider sites hosted on this hypothetical platform to be in the spirit of the community.
[tantek]oh hah we do have one, that was merely Loqi failing to create a redirect to a page with a space in the name. Pro-tip: use underscores when talking page names with Loqi
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "pika pika" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "pika pika is ____", a sentence describing the term)