Loqitantek: elf-pavlik left you a message 10 hours, 47 minutes ago: would you see convention of using mf: prefix apropriate for vocabulary terms defined by microformats.org? http://prefix.cc/mf
tantek!tell elf-pavlik "mf" appears to be an organically emerged convention abbreviation for microformats anyway so sure, using mf: prefix for vocabulary terms defined by microformats.org seems reasonable for folks that need such prefixes. We try to avoid prefixes because they're fragile.
KartikPrabhuI don't *need* one. But in long articles, I put p-summary on at least one <p> so that readers or consumers can display only that if they want to. Also want to keep a summary in the actual file which matches the summary I use in my articles list
KartikPrabhue.g. https://kartikprabhu.com/ all the articles listed have a summary. I want the full article to have the same visible <p> as p-summary and the thumbnail image as u-featured
KartikPrabhumy current system is a hybrid of database and files, but I really want the 2 to stay in sync. Also ultimately to ease transition to a file-storage system