Zegnat[tantek] do you know if the original resources are still available? The EPS link goes to Danβs site but is no longer hosted there. If it is available, do you know what licence applies?
[jgmac1106], [capjamesg], [Rose], [Murray], [grantcodes], KartikPrabhu, [tw2113_Slack_], [chrisaldrich] and [tantek] joined the channel
ZegnatGuess I might have to contact Dan to see if he would be open to slapping a public licence on it, if that was not previously discussed. (Also not sure how you best license a logo, that feels more like trademark rules coming into play than anything else.)
btremRegarding the logo in SuperTinyIcons: SuperTinyIcons is not my repo, so it's not really in my control. It's under the MIT license, which is pretty permissive, if that helps.
ZegnatBut given you have not signed away your own rights to anyone (which does not happen by opening pull-requests), you own all the rights. You can even give different people (or different repos) different licences.
ZegnatIn general lots of microformats work is done under public domain (or creative commons' version of it), and I would just think it fun if we logo was also available under that licence.
ZegnatThat is the iffy bit. You own the rights to the specific rendering of the logo, because you made that. But then I think trademark rights come in and say that you do not have the right to *use* your rendering for whatever you want without permission :P
btremHa ha. To avoid stepping on edent's toes (owner of SuperTInyIcons), I'll make my copy creative commons. I'll put in in /my/ GitHub repo. Does that work?
Zegnat!tell aaronpk can we make Loqi link to https microformats.org, now that we have a cert? I clicked on a link and was surprised that I was not logged in.
btremAs I said, I find it all not a little absurd. I suppose if I wrote a full fledged app of some sort, maybe I'd want a license. But svg markup? That's less than 1kb? Of someone else's logo?
ZegnatYeah. The thing is just that if you do not license it, me using your SVG on my site would break your alone right to do publications of your work. Even if you are unlikely to pursue
btremThat's what I learned when I first joined GitHub. And why I (somewhat randomly) chose GPL for my svg icons (I didn't know about SuperTinyIcons at the time).
ZegnatGPL technically means my app must also be GPL licensed if I want to use your icon. I think. Which is fine if that is the goal you want. If you are more "whatever, do what you want" a more permissive like MIT would be better. If you are "I do not care what you do with 1kb of svg", then a public domain declaration is saying you do not want to hold any claim at all
btremI see GPL on software that I use, and like. So I thought, that must me the way to go. Ha ha. But I did read an overview, and got what you said about GPL vs. MIT.
btremI'll let you know when I update my repo. If you want, you can email me dev@btrem.com about how to upload it to the mf wiki. That seems like the best way to provide a cc or pd logo.
zegnatedited /spread-microformats (+293) "/* Logo */ Fix Dan Cederholm links, point typeface link to a non-white page, add more licensing information" (view diff)
ZegnatWill do. It feels like a lot of the important copies of the logo on the wiki page is hosted off-base. And it would be nice to bring them onto the server where they are less likely to disappear :)
ZegnatThe main logo PNG in that section seems to be hosted on indieweb.org ... maybe someone had upload issues before and decided to just upload to that wiki instead, haha
btremHello. Earlier, regarding the discussion from earlier today about putting out the microformats svg logo, would the mf community prefer public domain or cc-by?