#social 2016-11-16

2016-11-16 UTC
timbl, KevinMarks and KevinMarks2 joined the channel
#
ben_thatmustbeme
sorry to hear that cwebber2, hope everything is alright
KevinMarks joined the channel
#
cwebber2
ben_thatmustbeme: thanks. it'll be alright, I think/hope. but best to be safe.
jasnell, KevinMarks2, KevinMarks, timbl, tantek and jasnell_ joined the channel
#
cwebber2
jasnell_: submitted implementation reports for my 3 as2 implementations
#
tantek
cwebber2++ woot!
#
Loqi
cwebber2 has 81 karma
#
Loqi
does a happy dance!
#
tantek
waves from MIT
#
cwebber2
hi tantek
#
cwebber2
wish I were there!
#
cwebber2
sorry I won't make it in person in the end.
#
tantek
cwebber2: we'll try to get the remote setup working well enough!
#
cwebber2
tantek: thanks!
#
tantek
Aside: just figured out in the CSS WG, that the 2016-12-06 is the hard deadline to put in a CR transition request for a CR transition call 2016-12-13 (which depends on schedules) which if successful would allow for CR staging on Wednesday 2016-12-14, which if it validates would allow publication 2016-12-15, the last possible day for that (Thursday) before the explicit publication moratorium 2016-12-19.
#
tantek
for the rest of the year
tantek joined the channel
#
csarven
tantek Do those dates apply for PRs as well? What happens if a PR transition request is not made before the end of year?
#
tantek
PRs have additional requirements - like the AC voting period, which I'm not sure how affects it. Technically I think a group needs to be around to publish a REC though (after the PR voting period, and that's assuming no objections)
#
csarven
So, charter ends 2016-12-31 ( according to https://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html ). Is that date still valid? If we are to apply for PR, what's the absolute deadline before the WG wraps up?
#
csarven
Are all ongoing specs on track to finalise before the WG ends (2016-12-31)?
#
tantek
yes that is correct. however I've put "charter extension" on the topics for the f2f
#
tantek
the biggest outlier is PubSub, which needs a lot more time just due to IPR constraints for FPWD
#
tantek
so we have to figure which of our specs will need how much more time
#
tantek
so we can scope any potential charter extension requests accordingly
#
csarven
Ack. Thanks!
#
tantek
(I'm assuming the narrower, the more likely of approval)
jasnell joined the channel
#
cwebber2
do we know what remote dial-in is being used tomorrow?
#
cwebber2
talky.io or something like it?
#
tantek
I think we'll try talky again and if that has problems we can try appear.in
#
cwebber2
cool, ok
jasnell and KevinMarks joined the channel
#
cwebber2
submits activitypub talk proposals to LibrePlanet, FOSDEM
#
cwebber2
btw, will anyone from here be at FOSDEM? because there's going to be a decentralized internet devroom https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2016-November/002495.html
#
cwebber2
#social relevant!
#
cwebber2
it's in Brussels, which is kind of quite the hop across the pond, but
#
cwebber2
good conf
KevinMarks2, KevinMarks, jasnell and timbl joined the channel