#social 2018-08-26
2018-08-26 UTC
# 
nightpool[m] but anyway yeah this is pretty standard behavior for fragment paths
# fiatjaf the existence of these uris (and @context and expansion) makes it a little easier for content senders side at the expense of a lot of burden on the content receivers side.
# fiatjaf ok, now that we agree on that I'll get back to my implementation using super heavy json-ld libraries
# nightpool[m] shrugs
# nightpool[m] i mean, you do you. but i'm trying to be Correct in the information i give you, and trading off correctness vs development speed is completely reasonable.
# nightpool[m] i think there are a lot of benefits to json-ld, but i can understand why people want to do pure json processing to
# saranix somebody should come up with a different standard, json-ld-direct ... where you must use the full uris every time instead of @context -- I think #litepub fits the bill
# saranix ""
# fiatjaf whoa, litepub is awesome
# nightpool[m] hmm?
# nightpool[m] as far as I know, litepub isn't even a thing yet.
# nightpool[m] but like i said—it's a microblogging spec.
# kaniini litepub is not a microblogging spec
# kaniini it is an activity exchange spec
# kaniini as is activitypub
# dansup and ActivityPub can be used for more than microblogging
# nightpool[m] sorry the "like I said" wasn't really about litepub, it was in reference to an earlier conversation
# nightpool[m] as far as i know, litepub doesn't exist
# nightpool[m] dansup: yes that was the point of what I was saying
# dansup oh
# kaniini a physical litepub spec does not exist yet, but it is definitely a thing
xmpp-social joined the channel
# JasonRobinson[m] Reading the backlog of the previous hours is again proof that we need something like litepub to act as a reference 😁
cwebber2, dlongley, vasilakisfil, KevinMarks and timbl joined the channel
# pantherse For an ActivityPub note, is "attributedTo" a good property to indicate who wrote the note?
# nightpool[m] yes
# pantherse tnx
KevinMarks_ and KevinMarks joined the channel