#wordpress 2019-03-18

2019-03-18 UTC
tw2113 and brokaw joined the channel
#
david.shanske.com edited /WordPress/Data (+107) "/* Post */" (view diff)
#
david.shanske.com edited /WordPress/Data (+406) "/* Comment */" (view diff)
#
david.shanske.com edited /WordPress/Data (-214) "/* Post Kinds Plugin */" (view diff)
#
david.shanske.com edited /WordPress/Data (+1095) "/* Comment Data Brainstorming */" (view diff)
#
david.shanske.com edited /WordPress/Data (+939) "/* Comment Data Brainstorming */" (view diff)
#
GWG !tell [pfefferle] Updated Data page. Curious if I described it well to start.
#
Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
[eddie] and [asuh] joined the channel
#
[asuh] https://wordpress.org/news/2019/03/one-third-of-the-web/
#
[asuh] WordPress is about 33% of the web, insane
[Rose] joined the channel
#
[Rose] !tell GWG It's ignoring HTML, it just puts it in as text.
#
Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
#
sknebel [Rose]: are you telling it you are sending html?
#
sknebel https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/#new-article-with-html
#
[Rose] Probably incorrectly, I couldn't find the right page. Thanks!
#
[Rose] Aha, I was doing it wrong.
chrisaldrich, [kevinmarks], [Rose], [aaronpk] and [jgmac1106] joined the channel
#
GWG [Rose]: Up for some feedback on the proposal pfefferle and I were discussing yesterday?
#
Loqi GWG: [Rose] left you a message 6 hours ago: It's ignoring HTML, it just puts it in as text.
#
GWG Looking for more eyes
#
[Rose] Yes! I am feeling lots better
#
GWG https://indieweb.org/WordPress/Data#Comment_Data_Brainstorming
#
GWG I updated the page with notes about the current data structure
#
GWG Step 1 is figure out the new storage method
#
GWG Then start a branch to merge Semantic Linkbacks and Webmentions with the data migration
#
GWG And include the templating system discussed in Semantic Linkbacks
#
[Rose] I like what I've read
#
[Rose] If it's not developmentally difficult, I would start with just what you've got - and then consider Pingbacks, Trackbacks, and Refbacks afterwards?
#
GWG Start with Webmentions
#
GWG And Activitypub
#
[Rose] Yes, precisely.
#
GWG The two actively developed ones
#
GWG I wrote refbacks, so not an issue to change it
#
GWG Pingback and Trackback are built into WordPress
#
GWG So discussion
#
[Rose] Well starting with the active plugins is most logical
#
[Rose] Then modifying core functionality can come later
#
GWG Yes
[kevinmarks], [jgmac1106], [eddie], [cleverdevil] and [pfefferle] joined the channel
#
[pfefferle] 👍
[schmarty], gRegorLove, [Rose], jackjamieson and francoscarpa joined the channel
#
GWG Hi, jackjamieson, what's the word?
#
jackjamieson Hi GWG, how's it going?
#
jackjamieson I've mostly been chipping away at Yarns UI stuff
#
jackjamieson And I'm hoping to do some testing of indieweb publisher this week. Seems like it's time to fix up my site a bit and I think that theme would work well
#
GWG It needs work
#
jackjamieson How's the support for post kinds and mf2?
#
jackjamieson If nothing else, I can play around with it on localhost to do some testing
[schmarty] joined the channel
#
GWG Gets better every day
#
jackjamieson GWG If I spot any low-hanging issues I can flag them to you and/or send a PR if you like. At first glance, it's looking quite good, but I'll take a closer look and let you know
[Rose], [frank], [tantek], [schmarty], drkokandy and j12t joined the channel
#
GWG I will be working on some plugin fixes, but anything you find I'll review
[schmarty], [tonz] and [frank] joined the channel
#
[frank] Question on Bridgy. When I publish my blogpost and use the Syndication Links plugin to post to Twitter, I get an error on Bridgy saying: I Couldn't find link to brid.gy/publish/twitter
#
[frank] What do I do to fix this?
[jgmac1106] and [aaronpk] joined the channel
#
[tantek] I thought there was a separate plugin for Bridgy Publish?
#
GWG I retired it
#
GWG I announced it in Berlin
#
GWG But the link is the issue then? Will look
#
GWG [tantek]: You were always advocating simplification and fewer things
[jgmac1106] joined the channel