KartikPrabhubret: but I don't think I have anything specifically from an indieweb perspective. One suggestion would be to start with a basic website and add simpler things first like "notes" instead of "articles" and buildup from there
acegiaksnarfed: yes. the I think that's what I'm gonna have to try and work out: how I actually handle fetching that data. So we're thinking that if I recieve a comment and display it on my site I should send a webmention to the post that is the "parent" of mine?
Loqiacegiak: tantek left you a message 9 hours, 39 minutes ago: that http://acegiak.net/files/2014/04/commentreplytree.jpg diagram looks a lot more complicated than any existing real world comment threading UI, so I would punt on that much complexity. Check /multireply for some simpler thoughts/examples.
kylewmsnarfed: are we on the same page about instagram author urls? like if you open ID 703876341980610724_13330911, that's an example of a post that has instagram.com/iamkulap as the author[url]
snarfedkylewm: got it. we definitely look for and extract the website field for users who sign up, and i think for all users, but instagram may not always provide it in all api responses
JonathanNealKartikPrabhu: that’s looking cool. Maybe it can generate a hyperlink looking thing in front of the text that you can click for the fragmention.
Loqiadactio: KartikPrabhu left you a message 4 days, 5 hours ago: your webmention here - http://kartikprabhu.com/article/blogging-dead#response-37 was hard to get right! the lack of p-author, u-url made me reconsider a lot of safe defaults in my code!
kbsbarnabywalters: are you aware of any services/etc that help manage device specific pgp keys for one person conveniently? eg: enable cross-signing, and key lookups for senders [so they can create messages for all the receiver's devices]
@jkphlSeriously disgusted by that enduring, destructive, one-dimensional #indieweb mud-wrestling out there. WTF is so hard about pulling together? (twitter.com/_/status/458609481484472320)
kbsit's predictable at least :) if you poke anyone on things they feel passionately about, it's bound to result in some drama - I guess a different part of the brain engages
bretwebmention is rad, but it is only the ping. webmention.io provides an api to get some of that data easily, but it doesnt work with a micropub endpoint in any way
bretif the micropub endpoint can get data into a static site, then it might also be a convient endpoint for actually getting reply data into the site as well
bretbarnabywalters maybe the endpoint would also just double as a webmention client in addition to a micropub endpoint, not really sure what makes the most sense yet
KartikPrabhukylewm: I don't know how to handle those correctly either :( since h-as-note is not supposed to be mf2. Maybe check that p-name is not same as e-content
kylewm(my point about mf2py, was that you might as well set it to what you want it to be since mf2 parser will give you one that is probably not what you want)
tantekbarnabywalters: ah ok. yes, I think this may be because the /note page is a bit older and needs updating to include the newer conventions of sections like "How to markup" and "why" etc.
KartikPrabhubarnabywalters: ooh! why didn't i think of that!! specially since I have already started storing fragmentions :P (even though I don't use those)
kylewmKartikPrabhu: i bet that like me, you started implementing comments traditionally (i.e. as content on YOUR site and not syndicated foreign content)
tantekit was a bit of poking fun. as in, here's this simple thing, just posting text notes. if you can't even do that, how can we believe any grandiose plans announced and hyped all over the blogs and interviews?
adactioHave you ever considered that other people might have different priorities from you ...and that's okay? e.g. Just because someone doesn't tweet from their own website (like me or Aral) doesn't make them the antichrist.
adactioI'm getting a bit sick of this attitude. When Marc Thiel—an events organiser—wanted to provide his talents and skills to boost the Indie web movement by organising an event, I suggested he raise that here in IRC. He got a really frosty reception because he wasn't (yet) doing things from his own website. So he was really put off the whole "indie web" label, and frankly I don't blame him.
adactioSeeing Marc and Aral treated as though they were enemies just because they don't *yet* fulfil some arbitrary entry requirements makes want to have no part in hanging out in this club's treehouse.
adactiotantek, I understand the reason for having some kind of barrier to entry e.g. having your own website. It keeps people out who are only interested in talking, not doing. But it has been taken too far.
adactiotantek, you don't speak for me. You do speak for the Indie Web movement. While you're displaying this attitude (and by extension, so is the Indie Web movement), I don't want to be represented as part of that movement.
adactiotantek, it's not about the technology. It's about the motivation. Even if you think that Aral's phone idea isn't viable, I still think he should be supported. You seem to be implying that it's all about the hype for him.
j12tLet me chime in here for a sec. Can I suggest we all try to articulate our values, and see whether we can “merge” them? Would be great if there was some indie manifest that wasn’t just Aral’s.
tantekadactio - there is a certain level of skepticism because the past 10 years are littered with promises of federated-this, open-that, and that's why we ask these hard questions
adactiotantek: then you need to explain the reasoning behind your criticism because without that explanation it just comes across as mean-spirited and petty (which I know you don't intend).
j12tI’m all in favor of sending the message “we are grown-up, we know what we are doing, we have our disagreements, but are respectful (and sometimes tough) with each other"
adactioMarc comes in here. Says "I want to help put on an event!". First thing he gets told isn't "Great! Let's do this!". It's "Where's your website. Prove yourself. Pass our tests."
adactiotantek: If you're going to take the time to belittle someone's work on Twitter, you can take the time to explain the reasoning behind it. (hint: Twitter is probably not the place for it)
tantekadactio - I think all the trademark stuff turned off alot of folks in the community (you know, an actual community, like here in #indiewebcamp, with 90+ people)
tantekand re: honey vs. vinnegar - a lot of us have kindly and repeatedly asked Aral over the 1.5 years that he's shown an interest in indieweb to show up here in #indiewebcamp, and please jump in and contribute to the wiki too.
adactioI just get so dispirited when I see people assume the worst motivations by default. "Someone talking about building something but they haven't yet shipped? All hype! Someone has put a trademark on something? They must be evil!"
tantekand he's pretty much ignored everyone else and instead gone off and made up new terms, new trademarks, and belittled an entire community's work as not user-centric
adactioOn the one hand you take someone to task for not shipping. On the other hand you take them to task for not spending their time in this IRC channel. They may well be mutually exclusive. And maybe he chose working and shipping over talking in IRC.
tantekadactio, by the measure of Aral's output (blog posts, tweets, new jargon, single-page sites), his priorities appear to be hyping his own ideas. If you see evidence otherwise, I'm very happy to be shown a better side.
brettantek, adactio has a point in that the arguments have a sour taste for people looking in from the outside and dont have much background about indieweb
adactiotantek: Like I said, assuming good motivations by default takes work. Sounds like you’ve got a considerable chip on your shoulder. I’m not saying it’s not warranted, but you can be a better person.
adactiotantek: your sour grapes are infecting the way the indie web community is being projected, and perceived by, people outside the community …our allies.
adactioI have no problem with Aral the person and Tantek the person having a disagreement. I have a huge problem with the Indie Web movement as whole being represented by the same attitude.
icco(Just for a data point as I run to dinner: I definitely agree with what adactio is saying here, but I can't complain given that when I was interested in indieweb, I ended up getting burritos with tantek + others, which inspired me to get more involved, so maybe it's a recent change in culture?)
adactiotantek, listen. When you speak about this stuff, you are speaking on behalf of the Indie Web community. I really, really don't like the way it's coming across. I don't want to be represented by this attitude. Ergo, you are turning *me* off the Indie Web community.
adactiotantek: It's the default position of "Prove your bona fides!" instead of the defaul position of "Oh, we have common goals. Let's work together" (see also Marc's frosty reception here)
adactiobret: The reason he's organising Decentralize Camp (as opposed to something labelled with Indie Web) is in part because of the attitude he encounted here (i.e. "Where's your website then?")
tantekthat being said, he did go work hard on decentralizecamp, which clearly showed progress (seemingly taking some of the feedback he got here), and now it's promoted right there on the indieweb events page
tantekadactio, seems like we haven't have a perfect (100%) record of welcoming new folks. however I do think we have a pretty good record. I'll let new people here speak for themselves.
@jkphlSeriously disgusted by that enduring, destructive, one-dimensional #indieweb mud-wrestling out there. WTF is so hard about pulling together? (twitter.com/_/status/458609481484472320)
kbsum. as a 'new people' here, and since you ask - my impression is that you (tantek) have some specific subjects and approaches that you are passionate about, which is great. It also results in a tendency to dismiss or ignore other approaches - c.f. http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2014-04-15 and around 17:00, as a personal experience
adactiotantek: And for the record, he is not an armchair commentator, he is someone who cares deeply about independent publishing (whether it's called Indie web or not).
ben_thatmustbemeI don't. I'm saying others do. That may be where they don't see the contradiction. They don't see the use in controlling their half of a conversation. its something they don't care to control
breti like the confrontation about the contradiction, tbh, but sometimes it just pisses people off because they feel vulnrible or critisized rather than seeing the issue
tanteknow click on the *next* line after the big text line, e.g. the 17:00 in front of "<kylewm> tantek: Webber definitely does run his own MediaGoblin"
tantekbut that's also why I started the Homebrew Website Club - for anyone with any level of *passion* about the topic (no website needed, no proof of work, just show up)
j12tPersonally, I’d be very happy with somebody who is great only at telling the story, but cannot operate his own indie site for now because he isn’t a geek and we haven’t made it easy enough for people like him
Loqitantek meant to say: j12t - telling everybody's story is a source of strength for a community, and something that no one individual just tellinging their own story can do.
ben_thatmustbemeI found the most acceptance when I started actually working on my own page. When I was just setting up WP i got questions answered, but when I actually started a project was when I really felt like people started to listen and take an interest. That idea of only really engage with those that are "doing" (however you choose to define it) is pretty good i think. Positive re-enforcement only.
j12tMaybe the question is this: do we want to intentionally exclude people from the community who we think aren’t going to be successful, or do we want to welcome them? (in some role that indicates that they have not shipped, or there are questions, or …)
tantekkylewm - sometimes it helps to know the people too. like Patrick is an ascerbic Brit who's quite pleasant in person and likes to tweet with that kind of tone in general.
tantekthe approach of asking such questions usually gets to the root of such assumptions, and either confirms them (we learn) or debunks them (the person with the assumption learns, hopefully)
ben_thatmustbemehonestly, I don't think its an issue of IF he ships. I honestly don't care. If he ships then we have something to look at and see if its in line with indie web goals. Outside of that I don't really see much reason to include him in indieweb.
j12tI don’t know … and I gotta run. But in general, I’m in favor of rolling out the welcome mat to everybody, as long as they don’t insist to keep the cooks from cooking in the kitchen, and the party guests from partying.
aaronpkyes, proof-of-work is great, and has supported this community growing very well and attracts the type of people who we want to contribute right now
KartikPrabhuI really get where tantek is coming from too. I had to deal with "all talk no action" people while organising something as simple as a journal club.
ben_thatmustbemeOh I completely get where he is coming from. For a community of creators, i think thats what is needed. Tantek's questioning and nonsense dismissal is great for that.
ben_thatmustbemeas far as the community perception of indieweb. I somewhat don't care. I like that I can work here on new standards that could end up being submitted to WHATWG and such. If we want to see community adoption (when standards are ready) we would be working with other creators like wordpress devs to get some new functionality in to wordpress.
gRegor`I agree for the most part with adactio's comments. Not to the point of being turned off to the indiewebcamp community like he indicated, but I winced when I saw "Want to be indie? Tweet from your own domain" (sans emoticon)
gRegor`I have not felt turned off to the community. I have disagreements on some approaches, but I think I'm pretty independent and don't let it get to me.
ben_thatmustbemei could certainly see delayed POSSE as useful in a company branding aspect. Don't want to start syndicating until it has been reviewed. but unless the post is private, its some of just a turtle issue again isn't it?
tanteke.g. 1) post note (including replies) on your own site, 2) send PuSH notification, 3) goes to subscribers/followers, including Loqi, who may post it here in #indiewebcamp if it is topical. 4) people in the channel provide feedback like "right on!" or "dude, wtf", 5) edit original post, save, re-PuSH, 6) see new version here in #indiewebcamp, 7) assuming everyone's all "much better!", push some "POSSE" button.
ben_thatmustbemeits shifting the source, people could just as easily view your site, once its posted, its posted, there isn't really a take-back on that
KevinMarks_Amber spoke there last week, and afterwards we went out for a drink with some medium engineers and talked about how they could be more indieweb friendly
KartikPrabhuso the policy is to have fragmention generators/makers take care of that and let the fragmention.js type things just look for the matching text
aaronpkI was just going to say... that's one of the things that puts me off about aral's whole "indie-*" thing. he's coming down so hard on the silos unnecessarily without a lot to back it up
@tIf your goal is better #indieweb UX, start by copying the best innovations from those silos to your site. #selfdogfood (ttk.me t4Vh3) (twitter.com/_/status/458719596846276608)
@jveloRT @t: If your goal is better #indieweb UX, start by copying the best innovations from those silos to your site. #selfdogfood (ttk.me t4Vh3) (twitter.com/_/status/458725321802801152)
KevinMarks_"The value must be unique amongst all the IDs in the element's home subtree and must contain at least one character. The value must not contain any space characters. There are no other restrictions on what form an ID can take
JonathanNealKevinMarks_: another advantage of ## is what developers may want to start doing with them, like extending jQuery, .querySelector, .find, or what have you to allow the search of elements by fragmentions.
tantekalso perhaps add a similar hyperlink "and <a rel="syndication" href="https://medium.com/everything-branches-out-until/41ef2be9953f">on medium</a>" after that one
JonathanNealWe could blacklist certain elements, like nav, script, style, meta, etc, or we could whitelist other elements, like h1-6... the aforementioned list.
mkoNot sure how Loqi even interpreted that URL the way it did. I just stepped through the URL redirect chain, and it's actually not that complex of a URL. lol