#jackyit's straightforward to say "personal website" and I think it's fine tbh
#jackybuilding these tools makes you notice how many assumptions other remote service have and how important it is to be a bit opportunistic when working with indieweb stuff
#jacky(like just b/c you can send webmentions to a site doesn't mean they also have a way to view all of the Webmentions sent to a particular URL - which would be handy for microsub clients to surface engagement)
#LoqiNational Novel Writing Month (typically shortened NaNoWriMo) is a challenge to write a 50,000-word novel (or other extended work) in the month of November https://indieweb.org/NaNoWriMo
#jackyIf I don't start on the 7th, it's not happening lol
#vilhalmerI'm nearing the one year anniversary of my "I have a blog" blog post which means it will be time for the "it has been one year since my last post" blog post
alex11, SureSumbat, segnior, GWG, wolftune, nickodd and ShinyCyril joined the channel
#mayakate[m]Cassidy was the one who answered my emailed Q about API use!
#mayakate[m]I haven't decided for my own use yet whether I want to regard a data file I keep for my site as the canonical Project entity, or just link posts to the Ravelry project. Partly that's because I haven't decided whether I want to update about projects serially in posts, or modify a more perennial description. (I'm sure this has analogues for other people in less fiber-based contexts) Anyway, I've got a chunk of writing but
#mayakate[m]I'll publish a blog post after I've had time to get something set up with the API.
#ShinyCyrilHello all! I came across your community on HN a couple of weeks ago and have been meaning to get involved.
#ShinyCyrilSo just popped in to say hi, and look forward to participating in the future :)
#ShinyCyrilThanks! I've not had one for a couple of years — been meaning to get one running again, hence my interest in IndieWeb. Currently cooking up something up involving solar and 4G — we'll see how that pans out!
#gbmorhey everyone, I'm new as well (even though i've idled here for a while, never spoken). i'm a pubnix-dweller, so it appears we probably have similar values.
#ShinyCyrilstarted thinking about how to get my blog up and running again, and then got captivated by the idea of scattering a few little 4G-connected embedded devices around to serve it from. So currently I'm trying to build a low-power Linux kernel for a Raspberry Pi!
#ShinyCyrilAnd then got lost down the rabbit hole that is IPFS...
#ShinyCyrilSeems like you have plenty of projects on your plate at the moment! Working on anything in paritcular?
#[Raphael_Luckom]yeah I spend an hour or so trying to think of a way to get `luck.om` or similar, but `.om` is the country code for Oman and the registrar seems to be a state-controlled thing. Once a year I decide to question all my domain choices and I spend an anxious evening after which I've spent $50 on tlds I'll never use.
#[Raphael_Luckom]In the short time I've been paying attention, it seems like more personal sites use things like webmentions and microformats than use things like ActivityPub. Is that accurate or is it just my availability bias?
#aaronpkthere's a lot of activitypub servers for sure but those tend to be group or public shared sites
#[Raphael_Luckom]that's the impression I was getting. It seems like activitypub and microformats both include taxonomies of _types of social data._ I'd like to have the advantages of both a good taxonomy and a good federation model.
alex11 joined the channel
#[Raphael_Luckom]initially I was thinking of making an activitypub server whose job was to be the online agent of a specific person--using the activitypub taxonomy but in an individually-federated system. But the more I look at microformats, the more they seem to fulfill that use case
wolftune, nickodd, dhanesh95 and [schmarty] joined the channel
#[schmarty][Raphael_Luckom] some folks do both! aaronpk runs his own setup that federates. Bridgy Fed is a service that sort of converts between the microformats+webmention space and activitypub space
KartikPrabhu, dhanesh and alex11 joined the channel
#petermolnar> I use `.com` though, which I guess I think of as short for `.commoner` - continuing that logic: .ci as citizen?
#petermolnarI see, there is no top level .ci, only secondary, like .net.ci (networked citizen?), int.ci (intelligent citizen?), .com.ci (common citizen?)
#[Raphael_Luckom][schmarty] thanks! that's exactly what I was wondering--whether there was something that kinda unifies the namespace. I'll check out Bridgy Fed.
#[Raphael_Luckom]yeah, the `.ci` idea is the concept I was looking for.