#[eddie]There are essentially 3 functions that seem to need to happen. A user should be able to post a suggestion, vote for a suggestion and comment on a suggestion
#[eddie]Essentially I think adding a suggestion would be a reply/syndication link to the roadmap homepage.
#[eddie]Voting for a suggestion would be sending a like to the permalink of a suggestion
#[eddie]And a comment would be a reply to a permalink
#[eddie]Seems like that’s all it would take. The rest would be on my administration of the suggestions by grouping them into categories on the backend
#jeremycherfas!tell Eddie one of the things I like about the Exist roadmap is that it emails me updates. When traffic is low, that makes it easy to keep up.
#[eddie]jeremycherfas: I just noticed that. That’s a cool feature. I was thinking about that. Email could definitely be a subscribe option. I’m also thinking you could have the stream of updates on a suggestion be an h-feed and link to RSS and JSON Feed, so you could get updates in a reader
#Loqi[eddie]: jeremycherfas left you a message 5 hours, 23 minutes ago: one of the things I like about the Exist roadmap is that it emails me updates. When traffic is low, that makes it easy to keep up.
#[eddie]Exist is a service that tracks and analyzes your life by pulling in information from various APIs and builds correlations to help you understand yourself better.
#LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "Exist" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "Exist is ____", a sentence describing the term)
#[eddie]Exist is a service that tracks and analyzes your life by pulling in information from various APIs and builds correlations to help you understand yourself better.
#jmacI'm faced with how my webmention processor should handle this case: <a href="http://example.com/blah" class="u-in-reply-to">...</a> ... <a href="http://example.com/blah" class="u-repost">...</a>
#ZegnatIf you are example.com/blah, you accept the mention
#jmacIf queried about what kind of wm it is, would it be better to say "It's both a reply and a repost", or is it OK to say "Its markup is wonky, soooo let's just say it's a reply" ?
#ZegnatThough I am now wondering if that is right.
#jmacThank you, I'm not sure I knew about the Post Type Discovery algo.
#ZegnatIf it also contains the in-reply-to, chances are it isn’t just a 100% share and will also contain some notes from the other party. So I am not sure if in-reply-to shouldn’t outrank repost-of
#ZegnatIf you are seeing this in the wild, you are actually best suited to answer that question: in this actual example, do you think it is a repost or reply?
#jmacBut it sounds like a post is generally only one thing, which is my main concern
#ZegnatUnder Post Type Discovery, posts are treated as one thing, yes
#jmacNo, not seeing it in the wild just yet. I'm fixing a bug in my processor's type detection, and the possibility of this confusion occurred to me.
#jmac(Before today, my Web::Mention module would check the entire h-entry in the wm source doc for e.g. an "in-reply-to" property, and mark the mention as a reply if it found one anywhere. Spot the bug!)
#ZegnatAh. Alright. Well, generally we expect repost-of posts to be duplications in their entirety (no added value) like a retweet.
#ZegnatSo seeing them together with in-reply-to should be rare
#jmacYep. I'd certainly consider it erroneous markup and wondered how to most gracefully handle it, and I think the PTD algorithm answers that tidily. Thanks!
#KartikPrabhuI save them as both "reply" and "repost" then decide which one when I am displaying them. So I don't lose any info if I change the display later
#ZegnatI don't have my webmention endpoint make those decisions either. It only makes sure it was a valid mention and stores it.
#KartikPrabhuright. I think it is better to have those things separated
KevinMarks_ joined the channel
#jmacYeah... this is for library code so it doesn't care about display either, and it'd be simpler if it just picked one.
#jmacI'm interested to see that Post Type Discovery lists RSVP as a post type, but not quotation. (My current list of types, which I assembled naively by myself months ago, is: reply, like, repost, quotation, mention)
#jmacObviously I should add RSVP support, but maybe I'm wrong in having quotations there too
#jmacDo I read Post Type Discovery correctly that if an webmention's source doc's h-entry contains a valid rsvp property anywhere inside it, then the webmention is an RSVP, no matter what else might in in the source?
#jeremycherfasQuotation is one that has always puzzled me, because for me it is always either part of a reply or of a bookmark. I’m not sure how I would do a quotation without a URL going to the source, which I suppose could be a <cite>
#jmacCompletely separate question: Anyone wanna volunteer to help code review my Web::Mention library work? (Requires tolerance for seeing raw Perl code.)
#jmacAll my wm library work so far has been just me, but it's probably far enough along now that it could definitely benefit from double-checking
#jmacMainly looking for someone to sign off on future patches (e.g. the bugfix I'd like to publish this weekend), versus grokking the whole mess currently there
KevinMarks, [jgmac1106], pstuifzand and singpolyma joined the channel
#ZegnatTalking of OPMLs: miklb, [jgmac1106], anyone, know of any sort of standard definition for feed reader export OPMLs?
#miklbI'm not. I once looked into how I might sync multiple OPML files in a GitHub repo and after a couple of hours reading I decided it was a hill I wasn't prepared to die on.
#jmacCould a kind soul please double-check that this is a valid minimal RSVP document? (This is input for an automated test.) https://pastebin.com/2PF201Px
#jmacOkay... so IF the source doc has an in-reply-to property associated with a URL that I, the webmention receiver, care about, AND the doc has a valid-value "rsvp" property anywhere inside it, THEN I must treat the webmention as an RSVP. Right?
#jmacJust for fun, if anyone wants to review my patch to add RSVP support and improve post type discovery to my Perl Webmention library, I've put up a pull request while I wander out to lunch. https://github.com/jmacdotorg/webmention-perl/pull/2/
snarfed joined the channel
#swentelsnarfed, commented out those .htaccess rules, stupid me :/
#swentelwill try again to see if something happens .. :)
#miklbhey snarfed I have a really weird thing happening with replies and WP and bridgy where if I put the permalink in the preview box, it parses correctly, but if I do a micropub reply it doesn't. Any suggestions on how to track that down?
#miklbmeaning, the micropub reply and syndication doesn't go through as a reply on Twitter, but if I take that same permalink and put it in the preview, it does show it as a Twitter reply
#miklblooking at the last test and it shows in-reply-to h-cite with a u-url to the original tweet. I deleted the tweet last night since it didn't make any sense out of context of being a reply
#miklbI deleted the failed reply, not the original
#snarfedhmm i wonder if it isn't handling composite in-reply-to right (as opposed to plain string url)
#[kevinmarks]yes, I mean that I don't think that you can have channels inside channels in microsub
#snarfedsorry, i meant, i don't see the real attempt on your bridgy user page
#miklbbut if I generate the reply in teh WP admin, it works. That's the other weird part of the equation. Only via micropub does this happen
#snarfedah ok. i wonder if the post is only half rendered when micropub pings bridgy, and it doesn't have the u-in-reply-to yet, or something
#sknebelI think we saw that a while back when miklb first encountered this
#sknebel(unless you changed something since then?)
#miklbwell, I've been tweaking the markup for the reply to make sure it wasn't something in the parsing, but now I've narrowed it down to micropub replies only. But I had just updated my template when I tested last.
KartikPrabhu, snarfed and TripFandango joined the channel
#miklbI can see I need to be more comfortable testing micropub locally
#miklbat last have a set of handy snippets I can use with shpub and my local site
KevinMarks, strugee_ and [keithjgrant] joined the channel
#[keithjgrant]Well, I shipped omnibear 1.2.0, but I forgot to re-run npm install after I switched machines, so I shipped it with a higher version of micropub-helper than I intended
#[keithjgrant]I'm not sure what that will mean for the WordPress interop...
#miklbI personally wasn't able to auth with Omnibear 1.1 or 1.2 with the master of all the plugins
#[keithjgrant]Has anyone tested with the current stable versions?
#miklbI haven't. I've been trying to iron the bugs out the 2.0 beta
#[keithjgrant]I'll do some Network traffic inspection and see if it's still sending the cookies
#miklbwe see the same error with other micorpub clients like OYG, which works for me so not sure the exact source of it