[tantek]Wait I thought “lifestyle business” was a strongly positive thing, with maybe just a tinge of luxury/privilege in the “wouldn’t it be nice if we could all do that” way
[cleverdevil]If you're a part of a business where you are heavily incentivized by ownership, you don't want to be a part of a "lifestyle business" unless you're a beneficiary of extremely high salaries and great benefits, because it won't pay off from selling equity later.
[jgmac1106]I am just addicted to the hustle. Call it what you want but to me money out there if you want it might take some time but you can either spend a dollar or turn it to two... Like a said more addiction than lifestyle I guess
[tantek][jgmac1106] the problem with delegating/distributing vocabulary creation to the edges like that is that not everyone is an informatician - and I'd posit that most such "communities of practice" have zero informaticians. Good vocabulary creation is a science unto itself. You don't delegate physics to everyone to do themselves for their community.
[tantek]If your goal is artistic/cultural expression, great, that distributes quite well. If your goal is *interoperability* and *standards* for sharing information back and forth, especially on a global scale, then you need skills for doing it well.
[jgmac1106]benwerd made good point on twitter that activitypubwill do everything xAPI does mainly because the vocabularies will be too extensive only the required things also required by activity pub will matter
aaronpkRe: bootstrapping, of course Silicon Valley needs a term to describe the opposite of raising VC money as if VC money is the normal option, ugh lol
[tantek]!tell jeremycherfas re: /microblog definition, that sounds like it is an alias for a /note post, and micro.blog is not the same as Kleenex as the time order was reversed (microblog was a generic term *before* micro.blog the service was launched, whereas kleenex became generic only long *after* Kleenex the product was launched). Do you mind if turn /microblog into a disambiguation page instead? E.g. it may refer to a /note post, or it may refer
Loqi[jeremycherfas]: [tantek] left you a message 46 minutes ago: re: /microblog definition, that sounds like it is an alias for a /note post, and micro.blog is not the same as Kleenex as the time order was reversed (microblog was a generic term *before* micro.blog the service was launched, whereas kleenex became generic only long *after* Kleenex the product was launched). Do you mind if turn /microblog into a disambiguation page instead? E.g. it may refer to a /note post, or it may refer
Loqimicroblog is a specific term for an individual note post, the act of writing such a post, a blog which is a collection of such posts, and also the name for a hosted service (Micro.blog) for such blogs https://indieweb.org/microblog
Loqiswentel: [tantek] left you a message on 2018-12-29 at 7:05pm UTC: For HWC in 2019, since we haven't had a HWC meetup in a couple of weeks now, we could start 2019 with either January 2nd, or January 9th. The 9th would be the regular date, two weeks after the 26th when we had scheduled but canceled. So that's what I'm leaning towards. WDYT?
@ton_zylstra↩️ die posting van @dries was aanleiding voor een posting van mij gisteren, waarop @frankmeeuwsen een antwoord schreef dat ontspoorde in de vroegtijdige aankondiging van #indiewebcamp . Kortom, het is toch al @Dries z’n schuld, kan-ie net zo goed er bij zijn :D (twitter.com/_/status/1093886397755342849)
[frank]I already had a feeling some posts would be automagically POSSED here. But yeah, me and Ton Zijlstra are planning an IWC Utrecht somewhere in the spring.
[frank]So we (me and [tonz]) will start looking for possible venues first and consider a few dates. We will keep Berlin/Dusseldorf in mind of course. I will try to be in Berlin myself.
[frank]We aim for 20 to max 40 attendees per day. I think this is possible because of connections with a rather large Dutch network with interested people. I don't want it to be too big for a first edition 🙂
[jeremycherfas][tantek] I’m happy with your definition. You miss the point of the analogy, which is not between Kleenex and kleenex but between Kleenex and facial tissue. Timing is not the point. Specific for general is the point. But it really isn’t important to me.
[jgmac1106][tantek] I checked the open washing, I added the content around oER as that is context more than APIs where it emerged, I also tried to move See Also into a more chronological order but your key definitions at top made sense so I left those
[jgmac1106]Tantek I think we lost much of the history discussing the page using chat because there wasn't much in search history but I remember sending you many of the links
[schmarty]lmk if it's too much of a pain to get there and we can change it ahead of time. if we don't like it for any reason we can try again elsewhere.
eddiehinkle.comedited /Planning (-376) "/* Washington DC */ Add possible venues section to brainstorming, clear out interested in participating because its old info" (view diff)
aaronpkpossibly possibly it's been coopted in modern language now enough that it isn't a concern to use it, but I think i'll still play it safe and avoid it
[tantek][tmiller] one thing we could use help with for IWC Berlin is getting 2019.indieweb.org/berlin setup - there's some folks here who have setup those pages and know how to do it from previous versions, what pitfalls to avoid etc.
[tantek]key pieces we don't omit: showing indie rsvps, showing tito registrations, form field to donate to diversity travel, form field to apply for diversity travel
[eddie]Also from chat, one learned lesson is I think it's best to have an Organizer do the 2019 page. During December I thought it would be helpful to set up the page for Austin, but it ended up missing a lot of info because I was in no way connected with organizing (or even attending). I just knew the day/time was verified. I would not recommend that again. It caused more issues than it solved 🙂
[manton]Thanks for updating the wiki pages for "microblog" vs. "Micro.blog", everyone. We always pronounce the "dot" in Micro.blog. I definitely don't want to take ownership of lowercase "microblog" which is a real word.
[eddie]!tell [chrisaldrich] a year or two ago in Washington DC IWC planning you mentioned that you might have connections with the School for Advanced International Studies that could lead to it being used as a possible venue? (https://indieweb.org/Planning#Washington_DC) Just feeling out if that is still a potential connection or if I should clean it up off the page?
[eddie]Gotcha. That's helpful to know. It's still in vague brainstorming stage for now. I'll list those on the wiki as "possible venues" while we keep track of potential locations
[eddie]Yeah and [jonathanprozzi] and I have met in Baltimore before. Not sure if he would want to help organize a IWC DC or not. But if so, he would be welcome to 🙂
[frank], benwerd, [Rose] and [tantek] joined the channel
LoqiJust generated this week's newsletter! You still have a few minutes to make changes, and I'll re-generate it 10 minutes before it gets sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2019-02-08.html
@mathemagenicGetting back to blogging makes me feel strongly about all those things I've been missing in the "friendly" walled garden of FB. I'll see if I can make it to IndieWebCamp Utrecht, but it is worth sharing so more people can join. (twitter.com/_/status/1093989519920164865)
[eddie]Regarding the IndieWebGuides discussion that came up in chat, I think the approach itself is very useful. It has a few too many clicks, but I think the key is it's focus is on "Which of these things would you like to do?"
[Rose]I think if people are looking at a getting started guide you can assume they want to, and provide a link to the advantages of it at the top for those who ended up there without knowing what it is.
[eddie]So taking the idea from the IndieWebGuide of actionable direction, but reducing the options and focusing on things you would do when Getting Started
[eddie]I think it would be an incremental improvement to just making the onboarding flow a bit more direct and action oriented than information based, which is what it is now
[tantek]Eddie, for general "making the onboarding flow a bit more direct and action oriented" take a look at the three column home page ideas that we've been working on
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "three column home page" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "three column home page is ____", a sentence describing the term)
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "bootstrapping" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "bootstrapping is ____", a sentence describing the term)
[tantek]I'm still in the habit of trying to think up a good new dfn for [schmarty] to read, despite knowing the Audio Edition is no longer happening. 😂
Zegnat[tantek], hmm, yes, I think so. Or rather, it simply hasn’t been coming up at all anymore and therefor I’d say there is no real issue for organisers to discuss
[tantek]Zegnat TBH I don't remember when we discussed it but I feel like we did and decide not to change anything? Or maybe explicitly document it on the the /discuss page that all those uses of the wordpress channel were ok?
ZegnatSo, yeah, it can be removed, and I was right to recall it should be removed. For some reason I just forgot I was the one who should be doing that!
[tantek]general technique: 1. edit/view source, 2. see how others are doing something, 3. copy/paste. 4. do not make up stuff from off the top of your head or first principles.
LoqiIt looks like we don't have a page for "2019/homepage" yet. Would you like to create it? (Or just say "2019/homepage is ____", a sentence describing the term)